Skip to main content
Log in

Contrasts of the Socioeconomic Space in the Center of Russia and Their Evolution: Two Cross-Sections

  • OLD-DEVELOPED AREAS IN THE SPACE OF RUSSIA
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

This article reveals the degree of spatial contrast in the Center of Russia at the level of municipalities based on a number of economic and social indicators along two cross-sections (socioeconomic profiles), which together resemble the letter X on the map and are shown as graphs. One section includes districts from St. Petersburg to Moscow and then to the south of Tula oblast, another section passes from southern outskirts of Kaluga oblast via Moscow to the eastern outskirts of Kostroma oblast. Along the selected routes various absolute and relative indicators are considered that reflect human migration to permanent residence, intra- and inter-regional temporary labor and summer migrations, as well as long-term dynamics of the urban population and the post-Soviet transformation of industry and agriculture in municipalities. It is shown that migration losses in the areas around Moscow oblast are both a consequence and a cause of the crisis of the local economy. The pre-revolutionary industrial potential was largely destroyed by the end of the 20th century, while the accumulated late Soviet potential had a significant impact on the current development of cities and regions. However, the possibilities of its post-Soviet use varied greatly from place to place. The cumulative effects of population concentration closer to Moscow, St. Petersburg, and regional centers and the consequences of economic shrinkage are clearly shown. Although the economy is partially recovering and changing its specialization, its enlargement and modernization, including in agriculture, increases the problems of employment and the social sphere, which are the most acute at the municipal level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.

Notes

  1. See the article by T.G. Nefedova and A.A. Medvedev Human Spatial Mobility and the Role of Dachas in the Old-Developed Areas in this special issue.

  2. Here we do not consider the southern Kirovsko-Lyudinovsky industrial region of Kaluga oblast, the continuation of the Bryansk old industrial area, which is located away from the section we have chosen. At the beginning of the 20th century glass and faience enterprises, and a locomotive building plant worked there. In the Soviet time, engineering enterprises grew up on this basis, some of which have survived to this day. However, the population of both cities, which does not reach 40 thous. in each, continues to decrease.

  3. See the article by A.G. Makhrova The Moscow Capital Region: An Example of Accelerated Development in this special issue.

  4. See in detail in the article by K.V. Averkieva and T.G. Nefedova Polarization of the Russia’s Socioeconomic Space to the Northeast of the Capital Core in this special issue.

  5. Separate article in this special issue is devoted to an example of its development. See the article by T.G. Nefedova From City of Kostroma to the Regional Outskirts.

  6. See the article by A.I. Treivish, O.B. Glezer, and T.G. Nefedova Old-Developed Regions in the Waves of Municipal Reform in this special issue.

REFERENCES

  1. Averkieva, K.V. and Nefedova, T.G., Dacha “colonization” of the Russian hinterland. The case of Kostroma oblast, Mir Rossii, 2016, no. 1, pp. 103–128.

  2. De Haas, H., Migration and development: A theoretical perspective, Int. Migr. Rev., 2010, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 227–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guriev, S., Mify ekonomiki: zabluzhdeniya i stereotipy, kotorye rasprostranyayut SMI i politiki (Myths of the Economy: Misconceptions and Stereotypes That are Spread by the Media and Politicians), Moscow: OOO Yunaited Press, 2010, 3rd ed.

  4. Ioffe, G.V., Sel’skoe khozyaistvo Nechernozem’ya: Territorial’nye problemy (Agriculture of the Non-Chernozem Zone: Territorial Problems), Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 164 p.

  5. Kaganskii, V.L., Kul’turnyi landshaft I sovetskoe obitaemoe prostranstvo (Cultural Landscape and Soviet Habitable Space), Moscow: Nov. Lit. Obozr., 2001.

  6. Krugman, P., Increasing returns and economic geography, J. Polit. Econ., 1991, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Makhrova, A.G., The seasonal dacha settlement pattern as an indicator of spatial development contrasts, Reg. Res. Russ., 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makhrova, A.G., Nefedova, T.G., and Treivish, A.I., Moskovskaya oblast’ segodnya i zavtra: tendentsii i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitiya (Moscow Oblast Today and Tomorrow: Trends and Prospects for Spatial Development), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2008.

  9. Makhrova, A.G., Medvedev, A.A., and Nefedova, T.G., Garden and dacha settlements of urban dwellers in the system of rural settlement pattern, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2016, no. 2, pp. 64–74.

  10. Mezhdu domom i… domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobil’nost’ naseleniya Rossii (Between Home and… Home. The Return Spatial Mobility of Population in Russia), Nefedova, T.G., Averkieva, K.V., and Makhrova, A.G., Eds., Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2016. http://ekonom.igras.ru/data/bhah2016.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nefedova, T.G., Shrinkage and polarization of rural space in Russia, Demoskop Wkly., 2012, nos. 507–508. http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0507/analit01.php. Cited May 12, 2020.

  12. Nefedova, T.G., Desyat’ aktual’nykh voprosov o sel’skoi Rossii: otvety geografa (Ten Topical Questions about Rural Russia: Answers from a Geographer), Moscow: URSS-LENAND, 2017, 2nd ed.

  13. Nefedova, T.G., Contrasts of socioeconomic space in the Center of Russia and their evolution: Two “cuts”-profiles, Reg. Issled., 2020, vol. 2, no. 68, pp. 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nefedova, T. and Treivish, A., Russia between the two capitals: Specifics of territorial changes, Reg. Res. Russ., 2014, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Plyusnin, Yu.M, Zausaeva, Ya.D., Zhidkevich, N.N., and Pozanenko, A.A., Otkhodniki (Seasonal Workers), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puteshestvie iz Peterburga v Moskvu: 222 goda spustya. V 2-kh kn. (Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow: 222 Years Later. In 2 Books), Nefedova, T.G., Treivish A.I., and Averkieva, K.V., Eds., Moscow: URSS-LENAND, 2015.

  17. Rodoman, B.B., Russian inner periphery: A view in different approximations, at different levels, in Rossiiskaya glubinka – modeli i metody izucheniya (Russian Hinterland–Models and Study Methods), Moscow: Inst. Geogr. Ross. Akad. Nauk; Eslan, 2012, pp. 41–48.

  18. Velikii, P.P., Neo-otkhodniki, or superfluous people of the modern village, Sotsiol. Issled., 2010, no. 9, pp. 44–49.

  19. Zubarevich, N.V., Rent of capital status, Pro et Contra. Moskva kak Fiz. i Sots. Prostranstvo, 2012, vol. 16, no. 6 (57), pp. 6–19.

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out at the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences within the framework of the project of the Russian Science Foundation no. 19-17-00174 and within the framework of the state task of the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences AAAA-A19-119022190170-1 (FMGE-2019-0008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. G. Nefedova.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nefedova, T.G. Contrasts of the Socioeconomic Space in the Center of Russia and Their Evolution: Two Cross-Sections. Reg. Res. Russ. 12 (Suppl 1), S87–S104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052270040X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052270040X

Keywords:

Navigation