Skip to main content
Log in

Urbanization and Rural Trends in Russia and in Its Old-Developed Regions

  • OLD-DEVELOPED AREAS IN THE SPACE OF RUSSIA
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The article considers the historical stages and current interaction between cities and rural areas. Old-developed regions of Russia are characterized by relatively high density of cities, but at the expense of small and most problematic ones. The urbanization of the 20th century led to the growth of several large centers that continue to “pull” people out of small and medium-sized cities and rural areas. The gap between the centers of regions and the territories they lead continues to grow. Prolonged urbanization has led to a significant devastation of the countryside outside Moscow oblast and in northwestern Russia. This was partly driven by the spread of small rural settlements in the forest zone. The peculiarity of Soviet agriculture and its post-Soviet transformations, the shift on crop production to the southern regions, and the impact on modern rural settlements are considered. It is shown how the modern technological paradigm of agriculture in the form of large modernized agro-industrial complexes has led spatial contrasts enhancement and the transition to a selective-focal commodity economy accompanied by shrinking land use. This led to the undermining the economic base of many rural settlements, and strengthening rural depopulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.

Notes

  1. The borders of Russia are considered in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993, with amendments approved during the All-Russian vote on July 1, 2020.

  2. See the articles devoted to the cities of the Center of Russia and the Urals in this special issue.

  3. We took into account data on the population of precisely cities without urban-type settlements and the rural population included in urban okrugs.

  4. Excluded from calculations are Grozny and Simferopol, as well as the centers of autonomous oblasts (since there are too few cities in them). Moscow and St. Petersburg are united respectively with the Moscow and Leningrad oblasts.

  5. The assessment of the degree of the population sobriety is annually carried out according to a number of indicators: (1) the number of deaths due to certain causes of death (alcohol poisoning), (2) the number of those registered with a diagnosis of alcoholism and alcoholic psychosis, (3) the number of crimes committed by persons in a state of alcoholic intoxication, (4) the volume of alcohol products sold, (5) the number offenses related to the illegal production and circulation of alcohol and alcoholic products, (6) the prevalence of measures to temporarily ban the sale of alcohol (National rating of regions’ sobriety. 2019, 2020. http://www.trezvros.ru/calendar/953. Accessed December 12, 2021).

  6. All-Russian Agricultural Census 2016. Vol. 2. Preliminary results of the 2016 All-Russian Agricultural Census for the federal subjects of the Russian Federation, Moscow: IIC “Statistics of Russia,” 2017.

  7. According to the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation, the level of gasification of settlements in rural areas (including multi-story buildings) with network gas as of January 1, 2017 was 59%, and the provision of drinking water (including local water supply systems) was 64%. In 2021 a law was signed on the free construction of a gas pipeline to the boundaries of the land plot of households with permanent residence where a gas pipe is connected to the village, and the distance from the site to the gas distribution network does not exceed 200 m (Federal Law on Amendments to the Federal Law On Gas Supply in the Russian Federation, June 2021. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru). Gasification of a house will still require about RUB 200–300 thous. from the homeowner, which is beyond the power of most rural residents. This does not apply to summer residents with their temporary residence.

  8. All-Russian Agricultural Census 2016. Vol. 2. Preliminary results of the 2016 All-Russian Agricultural Census for the federal subjects of the Russian Federation. Moscow: IIC “Statistics of Russia,” 2017.

  9. Regions of Russia, Moscow: Rosstat, 1999, 2019.

  10. The national economy of the RSFSR. The national economy of the RSFSR in 1987. Statistical collection, Moscow: Goskomstat of the RSFSR, 1988.

  11. The national economy of the RSFSR. The national economy of the RSFSR in 1987. Statistical collection, Moscow: Goskomstat of the RSFSR, 1988.

  12. All-Russian Agricultural Census 2016. Vol. 2. Preliminary results of the 2016 All-Russian Agricultural Census for the federal subjects of the Russian Federation, Moscow: IIC “Statistics of Russia,” 2017.

  13. It is possible that if institutional changes had taken place 30 years earlier, when the problems of agriculture had already become apparent, and the depopulation of the Non-Chernozem regions had not gone so far, agriculture would have had a chance to strengthen itself in a new quality. These changes could be based on farms of various sizes, incl. small private, and social arrangement of rural areas, thereby preserving part of the rural population.

  14. See the article by K.V. Averkieva and T.G. Nefedova Polarization of the Russia’s Socioeconomic Space to the Northeast of the Capital Core in this special issue.

  15. Form of long-term temporary mobility widespread in Russia.

REFERENCES

  1. Alekseev, A.I., Mnogolikaya derevnya: naselenie i territoriya (The Many Faces Of Village: Population and Territory), Moscow: Mysl’, 1990.

  2. Alekseev, A.I. and Safronov, S.G., Changes in rural settlement in Russia in the late 20th–early 21st century, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2015, no. 2, pp. 66–76.

  3. Averkieva, K.V., Danshin, A.I., Zemlyanskii, D.Yu., and Lamanov, S.V., Strategic challenges of the development of agriculture in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 322–332.

  4. Barsukova, S.Yu., The dilemma “farmers–agricultural holdings” in the context of import substitution, Obshchestv. Nauki Sovrem., 2016, no. 5, pp. 63–74.

  5. Chayanov, A.V., Optimal’nye razmery sel’skokhozyaistvennykh predpriyatii (Optimal Sizes of Agricultural Enterprises), Moscow: Nov. Derevnya, 1924.

  6. Chayanov, A.V., Krest’yanskoe khozyaistvo (Peasant Economy), Moscow: Ekonomika, 1989.

  7. Chayanov, A.V., Osnovnye idei i formy organizatsii sel’skokhozyaistvennoi kooperatsii (Basic Ideas and Forms of Organization of Agricultural Cooperation), Moscow: Nauka, 1991.

  8. Ekonomicheskaya geografiya, T. 2: SSSR (Economic Geography, vol. 2: USSR, Baranskii, N.N., Ed., Moscow: Kommunist. Univ. im. Sverdlova, 1929. Fet, A., Zhizn’ Stepanovki ili liricheskoe khozyaistvo (Life of Stepanovka or Lyrical Economy), Moscow: Nov. Liter. Obozrenie, 2001.

  9. Fielding, A.J., Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950, Geogr. J., 1989, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geyer, H.S. and Kontuly, T., A theoretical foundation of the concept of differential urbanization, Int. Reg. Sci. Rev., 1993, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glezer, O.B. and Vainberg, E.I., The space of life activities of the population and settlement pattern as the factors and conditions of the modernization of Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunko, M.S. and Glezer, O.B., Small regional centers and surrounding territories in Central Russia in 1970−2010: Population dynamics and distribution, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Geogr., 2015, no. 1, pp. 64–76.

  13. Gunko, M.S., Relationships between small towns and rural areas in Central Russia, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (geogr.) Dissertation, Institute of Geogr. Russ. Acad. Sci., Moscow, 2015.

  14. Ioffe, G.V., Sel’skoe khozyaistvo Nechernozem’ya: Territorial’nye problemy (Agriculture of the Non-Chernozem Zone: Territorial Problems), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.

  15. Ioffe, G., Nefedova T., and Zaslavsky I., From spatial continuity to fragmentation: The case of Russian farming, Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers, 2004, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 913–943.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T., and Zaslavski, I., The End of Peasantry? The Disintegration of Rural Russia, Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T., and De Beurs, K., Land abandonment in Russia: A case study of two regions, Eurasian Geogr. Econ., 2012, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalugina, Z.I., Paradoksy Agrarnoi reformy v Rossii: sotsiologicheskii analiz transformatsionnykh protsessov (Paradoxes of Agrarian Reform in Russia: A Sociological Analysis of Transformational Processes), Novosibirsk: Institut Ekon. Organiz. Promyshl. Proizvodstva Sib. Otdel. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2001.

  19. Kovalev, S.A., Sel’skoe rasselenie. Geograficheskoe issledovanie (Rural Settlement Pattern. Geographic Research), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1963.

  20. Kovalev, S.A. and Koval’skaya, N.Ya., Geografiya naseleniya SSSR (Geography of the Population of the USSR), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1980.

  21. Kuprina, K.A., Kuprin, my father, in A.I. Kuprin. Izbrannoe (A.I. Kuprin. Selectas), Moscow: Pravda, 1988, pp. 323–438.

  22. Leizerovich, E.E., Ekonomicheskie mikroraiony Rossii (setka i tipologiya) (Economic Microdistricts of Russia (Grid and Typology)), Moscow: Trilobit, 2004.

  23. Lukhmanov, D.N., Evolyutsiya sel’skogo rasseleniya, in Gorod i derevnya v Evropeiskoi Rossii: 100 let peremen (City and Village in European Russia: 100 Years of Change), Nefedova, T., Polyan, P., and Treivish, A., Eds., Moscow: O.G.I., 2001.

  24. Lyuri, D.I., Goryachkin, S.V., Karavaeva, N.A., Denisenko, E.A., and Nefedova, T.G., Dinamika sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zemel’ v XX veke i postagrogennoe vosstanovlenie rastitel’nosti i pochv (Dynamics of Agricultural Land in the 20th Century and Post-Agrogenic Restoration of Vegetation and Soils), Moscow: GEOS, 2010.

  25. Mironov, B.N., Sotsial’naya istoriya Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII – nachalo XX v.) (Social History of Russia in the Period of the Empire (18th – Early 20th Century)), St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulavin, 1999, vol. 2.

  26. Mironov, B.N., Rossiiskaya imperiya: ot traditsii k modernu. V 3-kh tomakh (Russian Empire: From Tradition to Modernity. In 3 Volumes), St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin, 2014, vol. 1.

  27. Mkrtchyan, N.V., Migration balance of Russian cities: On the issue of the influence of size and position in the system of center-periphery relations, in Nauchnye trudy: Institut Narodnokhoz. Prognozirovaniya RAN (Scientific Papers: Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Moscow: MAKS, 2011, pp. 416–430.

  28. Naumov, A.S., Regional development of agriculture in European countries and in Russia in the context of global food interdependence and shortage of land resources, Vestn. Ross. Univ. Druzhby Narodov. Ser. Ekon., 2014, no. 3, pp. 63–74.

  29. Nefedova, T.G., Desyat’ aktual’nykh voprosov o sel’skoi Rossii: otvety geografa (Ten Topical Questions about Rural Russia: Answers from a Geographer), Moscow: URSS-LENAND, 2013.

  30. Nefedova, T.G., Twenty-five years of Russia’s post-Soviet agriculture: Geographical trends and contradictions, Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nefedova, T.G., Modern peasant economy in the rural-urban environment, Krest’yanovedenie, 2018, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nefedova, T.G. and Glezer, O.B., Transformation of the socio-geographical space of Russia, in Vyzovy i politika prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii v XXI veke (Challenges and Policy of Spatial Development of Russia in the 21st Century), Moscow: KMK, 2020, pp. 214–251.

  33. Nefedova, T.G. and Nikolaeva, U.G., Modern personal subsidiary plots of villagers and townspeople: Historical dynamics, functions, spatial differences, Population and Econ., 2019, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nefedova, T. and Pallot, J., Russia’s Unknown Agriculture. Household Production in Post-Socialist Rural, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nefedova, T.G. and Treivish, A.I., Cities and countryside: State and correlation in the space of Russia, Reg. Issled., 2010, no. 2, pp. 42–57.

  36. Nefedova, T.G. and Treivish, A.I., Urbanization and seasonal deurbanization in modern Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nikonov, A., Spiral’ mnogovekovoi dramy: agrarnaya nauka i politika Rossii (XVIII–XX vv.) (Spiral of Centuries-Old Drama: Agrarian Science and Politics in Russia (18th–20th Centuries)), Moscow: Entsiklopediya Ross. Dereven’, 1995.

  38. Ovchintseva, L.A., Human potential and infrastructure development of rural areas, in Nauchno-metodicheskie osnovy ustoichivogo razvitiya sel’skikh territorii (Scientific and Methodological Foundations of Sustainable Development of Rural Areas), Moscow: Vseross. Inst. Agrar. Probl. Inf. im. A.A. Nikonova, 2015, no. 41, pp. 110–130.

  39. Richardson, H.W., Polarization reversal in developing countries, Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc., 1980, no. 45, pp. 67–85.

  40. Shagaida, N.I. and Uzun, V.Ya., Draivery rosta i strukturnykh sdvigov v sel’skom khozyaistve Rossii (Growth Drivers and Structural Changes in Russian Agriculture), Nauchnye doklady RANKhiGS (Scientific Reports of RANEPA), no. 4 (19), Moscow: Delo, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Semyonov-Tian-Shanskiy, V.P., Gorod i derevnya v Evropeiskoi Rossii. Ocherk po ekonomicheskoi geografii s 16 kartami i kartogrammami (City and Village in European Russia. Essay on Economic Geography with 16 Maps and Cartograms), St. Petersburg: Tipogr. Kirshbauma, 1910. Gorod i derevnya v Evropeiskoi Rossii: 100 let peremen (City and Village in European Russia: 100 Years of Change), Nefedova, T., Polyan, P., and Treivish, A., Eds., Moscow: O.G.I., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Streletsky, V.N., Ethnic communities in the geocultural space of Russia, Vestn. Istor. Geogr., 1999, no. 1, pp. 31–54.

  43. Treivish, A.I., Gorod, raion, strana i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda (City, Region, Country and the World. The Development of Russia through the Eyes of a Country Expert), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2009.

  44. Treivish, A.I. and Nefedova, T.G., Capitalism, centrality, size and rivalry of cities in the world and in Russia, in Geourbanistika i gradostroitel’stvo: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty (Geourbanistics and Urban Planning: Theoretical and Applied Aspects), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2021, pp. 49–72.

  45. Zubarevich, N.V., Regiony Rossii. Neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya (Regions of Russia. Inequality, Crisis, Modernization), Moscow: Independent Institute for Social Policy, 2010.

  46. Zubarevich, N.V., Transformation of the rural settlement pattern and social services network in rural areas, Reg. Res. Russ., 2013, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out at the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences within the framework of the project of the Russian Science Foundation no. 19-17-00174 and within the framework of the state task of the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences AAAA-A19 -119022190170-1 (FMGE-2019-0008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. G. Nefedova.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nefedova, T.G. Urbanization and Rural Trends in Russia and in Its Old-Developed Regions. Reg. Res. Russ. 12 (Suppl 1), S24–S41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700319

Keywords:

Navigation