Skip to main content
Log in

Determining the Smart Specialization of Russian Regions in the Context of Domestic and European Experience

  • INSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The relevance of applied engineering of new development mechanisms for Russian regions is due to the ineffectiveness of innovative strategies currently in force and isolation of scientific and technological development from the sectoral potential of the territories. Russia’s Spatial Development Strategy until 2025, approved in 2019, led to a conflict between promising sectoral economic specializations and the real problems of different types of territories. The “smart specialization” approach may take the lead in aligning the sectoral and territorial approaches. The article describes the differences between traditional and smart specializations. It is shown that in the case of smart specialization, it is not the selection of individual sectors as “points” that takes place, but determination of the set of types of economic activity in conjunction with regional competencies as a fuzzy core with blurred boundaries. The characteristics of the sectoral, patent, innovation, and publishing components as integral parts of the developed methodological approach, are given. All components are linked through the priorities of the Science and Technology Development Strategy, which plays the role of a national research platform (program) reflecting the long-term priorities of the economy and society. The coordinated choice of regional development prospects solves the problem of isolated technological forecasts for territories. Coordination of sectoral and scientific and technological priorities for a territory can be considered the basis for selecting regional investment projects. This will allow the federal executive authorities to set a general framework for the most desirable goals of scientific and technological development in a spatial context, and to take on venture risks with the support of technology start-ups and emerging sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Smart specialization. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/smartspecialisation.htm. Accessed April 25, 2021.

  2. Midtkandal I., Sörvik J. What is Smart Specialization? http://archive.nordregio.se/en/Metameny/Nordregio-News/ 2012/Smart-Specialisation/Context/index.html. Accessed April 18, 2021.

  3. Foray D., Keller M., Bersier J., Meier zu Köcker G. Transformative Activity for Smart Specialization: Considerations on a Workshop Methodology // Working Paper, 2018. https://www.clusterportal-bw.de/fileadmin/media/Download/Downloads_ News_Presse/foray-keller-bersier-and-meier-zu-koecker-2018-.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2021.

  4. Vezzani A., Baccan M., Candu A., Castelli A., Dosso M., Gkotsis P. Smart Specialization, seizing new industrial opportunities // European Commission, JRC Technical Reports, 2017.

  5. Värmland’s Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialization 2015–2020. https://www.kau.se/files/2017-12/Strategy%20Smart%20Specialisation%202015-2020.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2021.

  6. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2019 no. 3227-r Implementation Plan for the Spatial Development Strategy for the Period up to 2025. http://government.ru/docs/38742/

  7. The implementation of Smart Specialization Strategies in 2014-20 ESIF programs: turning intelligence into performance, EPRS, IQ-Net Thematic Paper 39, 2016.

  8. Order of the Russian Federation Government of December 13, 2019 no. 207-r Spatial Development Strategy until 2025. http://government.ru/docs/35733/

REFERENCES

  1. Alampiev, P.M., Ekonomicheskoe raionirovanie SSSR (Economic Zoning of USSR), Moscow: Izd. Ekon. Liter., 1963, book 2.

  2. Bubel, D., Łęgowik-Świącik, S., Kowalska, S., The concept of smart specialization as an innovation management instrument in light of polish and Austrian experience, Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Czestochow., Zarzadzanie, 2017, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dolgosrochnoe prognozirovanie territorial’nogo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii. Metodologicheskie osnovy i prognoz na period do 2015 goda (Long-Term Forecasting of Territorial Economic Development of Russia: Methodology Principles and Forecasting until 2015), Shtul’berg, B.M., Ed., Moscow: Sov. Izuch. Proizvod. Sil, 2002.

  4. Foray, D., From smart specialization to smart specialization policy, Eur. J. Innovation Manage., 2014, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 492–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foray, D., David, P.A., and Hall, B.H., Smart Specialization: From Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in Its Implementation: Working Paper No. EPFL-WORKING-170252, Lausanne, 2011.

  6. Gómez Prieto, J., Demblans, A., and Palazuelos Martínez, M., Smart specialization in the world, an EU policy approach helping to discover innovation globally, 2019. https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/-/smart-specialisation-in-the-world-an-eu-policy-approach-helping-to-discover-innovation-globally?inheritRedirect=true. Accessed January 8, 2019.

  7. Kaneva, M.A. and Untura, G.A., Interrelation of R&D, knowledge spillovers, and dynamics of the economic growth of Russian regions, Reg. Res. Russ., 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kistanov, V.V., Territorial’naya organizatsiya proizvodstva (otraslevoi, raionnyi i narodokhozyaistvennyi aspekty) (Territorial Organization of Production: Industrial, Regional, and National Economic Aspects), Moscow: Ekonomika, 1981.

  9. Kotov, A.V., Methodological approach to smart specialization for the Russian regions, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2020, no. 2 (106), pp. 22–45.

  10. Kotov, A.V. and Pilyasov, A.N., “Terra incognita”: new industrial regions of Russia, in Ekonomika i geografiya (Economy and Geography), Zaostrovtsev, A.P. and Limonov, L.E., Eds., St. Petersburg, 2013, pp. 103–159.

  11. Kotov, A.V., Grishina, I.V., and Polynev, A.O., Umnaya spetsializatsiya regiona—variant resheniya dlya Rossii. Nauchnyi ocherk (Smart Specialization of the Region: Solutions for Russia. Scientific Review), Moscow: Vseross. Akad. Vneshn. Torgovli, Minist. Ekon. Razvit. Ross. Fed., 2019.

  12. Kravchenko, N.A., Kuznetsova, S.A., Yusupova, A.T., Khalimova, S.R., and Baldina, N.P., Development of high-tech business in Siberia: constraints and prospects, Reg. Res. Russ., 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kutsenko, E., Islankina, E., and Kindras’, A., Smart by oneself? An analysis of Russian regional innovation strategies within the RIS3 framework, Foresight STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuznetsova, O.V., Problems of elaboration of spatial development strategy of Russian Federation, Prostr. Ekon., 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Metodologicheskie problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov SSSR (Methodological Problems of Social-Economic Development of USSR Regions), Ivanchenko, A.A., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nekrasov, N.N., Regional’naya ekonomika. Teoriya, problemy, metody (Regional Economy: Theory, Problems, and Methods), Moscow: Ekonomika, 1978.

  17. Osobennosti i factory otraslei narodnogo khozyaistva SSSR (Features and Localization Factors of National Economic Sectors of USSR), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960.

  18. Pavlenko, V.F., Territorial’noe planirovanie v SSSR (Territorial Planning in USSR), Moscow: Ekonomika, 1975.

  19. Problemy teorii i praktiki razmeshcheniya proizvoditel’nykh sil SSSR (Theory and Practice of Localization of Productive Forces in USSR), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.

  20. Probst, A.E., Voprosy razmeshcheniya sotsialisticheskoi promyshlennosti (Localization of Socialistic Industry), Moscow: Nauka, 1971.

  21. Probst, A.E., Walter Isard and his methods of regional analysis: introduction article, in Metody regional’nogo analiza: vvedenie v nauku o regionakh (Methods of Regional analysis: Introduction into Regional Science), Moscow: Progress, 1966, pp. 5–15.

  22. Prognozirovanie sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona: voprosy teorii i metodiki (Forecasting of Socialeconomic Development of the Region: Theory and Practice), Kol’tsov, A.V. and Fedorova, T.A., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

  23. Territorial’no-otraslevoi printsip planirovaniya: teoriya i praktika (Territorial and Sectoral Planning Principle: Theory and Practice), Mochalov, B.M., Ed., Moscow: Mysl’, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zemtsov, S.P. and Barinova, V.A., The paradigm changing of regional innovation policy in Russia: from equalization to smart specialization, Vopr. Ekon., 2016, no. 10, pp. 65–81.

Download references

Funding

The article was prepared within the framework of the applied economic research of the Council for the Study of Production Forces in 2019, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Ministry of Economic Development of Russia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Kotov.

Ethics declarations

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotov, A.V. Determining the Smart Specialization of Russian Regions in the Context of Domestic and European Experience. Reg. Res. Russ. 11, 378–386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970521030084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970521030084

Keywords:

Navigation