Skip to main content
Log in

Formation of the State Territory of the Former USSR and Circulation of Russian Language Nowadays

  • SOCIOCULTURAL SPACE
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The article examines the current state of the space of the Russian language as a result of the relationship between various ethnocultural communities. The research area is limited to so-called “post-Soviet” countries. However, the time intervals encompassed by the study vary depending on the length of time these countries or parts of them have remained within a single state. The study verifies the hypothesis of a relationship between the duration that countries or regions remain within a single state and the degree of change in their language space. Regions of the post-Soviet space were combined into groups depending on how long they remained in a single state. A modern assessment of the state of the Russian language space is given for 2010. As a result of the study, the hypothesis is confirmed only as a general trend and therefore attention is paid to regions falling outside this pattern. In particular, within Russia, Kaliningrad Oblast and the southern Far Eastern regions are territories that have relatively recently become part of a single state, characterized by a high degree of language assimilation by the Russian ethnic group. In republics of Chuvashia, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, Dagestan, Ingushetia, and Chechnya, conversely, despite the duration they have remained within Russia, the smallest degree of transformation of the language space influenced by the Russian ethnic group is observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors of present paper attempted to identify the general trends of the ethnic transformation in all post-Soviet countries in (Manakov and Danilkina, 2021).

  2. http://pop-stat.mashke.org/. Accessed August 14, 2020.

  3. https://www.belstat.gov.by/informatsiya-dlya-respondenta/ perepis-naseleniya/perepis-naseleniya-2009-goda/statisticheskie-publikatsii/statisticheskie-byulleteni/index. Accessed August 14, 2020.

  4. https://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/Vol4/pub-04-09.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2020.

REFERENCES

  1. Dirin, D.A., Geocultural space: concept, structure, general properties, and factors of differentiation, Geogr. Prirodopol’z. Sib., 2015, no. 19, pp. 45–56.

  2. Dirin, D.A., The concept of “geocultural space” in social geography, Sots.-Ekon. Geogr., Vestn. Assots. Ross. Geogr.-Obshch., 2018, no. 7, pp. 146–160.

  3. Druzhinin, A.G., Classics of “Eurasianism” about Russian-Turkic interaction (a look at the past, looking to the future), Pskov J. Reg. Stud., 2020, no. 3 (43), pp. 3–15. https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310010263-2

  4. Fierman, W., Russian in post-Soviet Central Asia: a com-parison with the states of the Baltic and South Caucasus, Eur.-Asia Stud., 2012, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1077–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fierman, W., Trends of language use in prestige domains in post-Soviet Central Asia, Alatoo Acad. Stud., 2016, no. 1, pp. 35–42.

  6. Flynn, M., Renegotiating stability, security and identity in the post-Soviet borderlands: the experience of Russian communities in Uzbekistan, Natl. Pap., 2007, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heleniak, T., The End of an Empire: Migration and the Changing Nationality Composition of the Soviet Successor States, Diasporas and Ethnic Migrant: German, Israel, and Post-Soviet Successor States in Comparative Perspective, Ohliger, R. and Munz, R., Eds., London: Frank Case, 2003, pp. 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heleniak, T., Migration of the Russian diaspora after the breakup of the Soviet Union, J. Int. Aff., 2004, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 99–117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 24357868?seq=1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manakov, A.G., Spatial patterns in the transformation of the ethnic structure of the Russian population between the 1959 and 2010 censuses, Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2019, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372819020021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manakov, A.G., Main trends in the transformation of the ethnic space of the Central Asian macroregion from 1897 to 2017, Reg. Res. Russ., 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520040176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manakov, A.G. and Danilkina, N.V., Main trends of ethnic transformation in the post-Soviet space, Pskov J. Reg. Stud., 2021, no. 1 (45), pp. 21–36. https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310013355-3

  12. Manakov, A.G. and Khokhrin, A.G., Transformation of the ethnic space of Kazakhstan and Central Asia between population censuses of 1970 and 1989, Pskov J. Reg. Stud., 2020, no. 2 (42), pp. 55–70. https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310008580-1

  13. Streletsky, V.N., Concept of cultural landscape in Russian cultural-geographical tradition, Pskov J. Reg. Stud., 2020, no. 4 (44), pp. 83–92. https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310012428-3

  14. Strel’tsova, Ya.R., The potential of the Russian language as a mean of integration into the Eurasian space, Inf. Voiny, 2014, no. 2 (30), pp. 81–87.

  15. Stride, S., Identidad y espacio en Asia Central, Rev. CIDOB Afers Int., 2005, vols. 70–71, pp. 9–33. https://doaj.org/article/7f1dfaebbdef40508023d3e403a631a2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sushchiy, S.Ya., Russian population of the near abroad: geodemographic dynamics of the post-Soviet period, Demographic review, 2020, vol. 7., no. 2, pp. 6–30. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11137

  17. Sushchiy, S.Ya. and Druzhinin, A.G., Ocherki geografii russkoi kul’tury (Geography of Russian Culture), Rostov-on-Don: Sev.-Kavk. Nauchn. Tsentr, Vyssh. Shk., 1994.

  18. Tishkov, V.A., The Russian language and the Russian-speaking population in the CIS and Baltic countries, Herald Russ. Acad. Sci., 2008, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 222–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ubiria, G., Soviet Nation-Building in Central Asia: The Making of the Kazakh and Uzbek Nations, London: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vasil’eva, T.V., Saakyan, L.N., and Uskova, O.A., Russian language as a factor organizing the Russian cultural space in the CIS countries, Vestn. Tsentra Mezhdunar. Obraz., Mosk. Gos. Univ., Filol., Kul’turol., Pedagog., Metod., 2011, no. 2, pp. 103–109.

  21. Zakirov, A. and Tashtemirov, I., Sociolinguistic processes in modern Kyrgyzstan: monitoring and dynamics of development of languages after gaining independence, Alatoo Acad. Stud., 2020, no. 2 (2), pp. 124–132. https://doi.org/10.17015/aas.2020.202.14

  22. Zolyan, S.T., Russian language and the cultural and civilizational space of the CIS countries, Slovo.ru: Balt. Aktsent, 2012, no. 2, pp. 23–29.

Download references

Funding

The research is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-05-00369 (“Transformation of the Ethnocultural Space of Post-Soviet States: Factors, Trends, Prospects”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. G. Manakov or N. V. Danilkina.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The article was updated by the authors in 2021 for publication in Regional Research of Russia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manakov, A.G., Danilkina, N.V. Formation of the State Territory of the Former USSR and Circulation of Russian Language Nowadays. Reg. Res. Russ. 11, 212–219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052102009X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052102009X

Keywords:

Navigation