Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the morphology of the intercity road network

  • THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL GEOGRAPHY
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Many aspects of the functioning of the transport network and its impact on the socioeconomic development of a territory significantly depend on its morphology. In particular, the morphological features of the network underlie the network effects, which can lead to significant changes in transport costs (both downward and upward) with minor modifications to the network. The article analyzes the factors most significant for the morphology of the intercity transport network and presents a mathematical description of the mechanisms for the realization of their influence. It is shown that the key factor is the location of network vertices in space, and a two-parameter family of models is proposed that can generate networks close to real ones, only based on information about the spatial location of their vertices. Implementation of the proposed model is demonstrated using the intercity highway network in Belarus. For this network, the optimal parameter values were selected, and it was shown that the resulting model is quite close to the original network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Precise definitions and descriptions of the terms “dendrites” and “cycles” in relation to transport networks can be found in [9].

  2. The standard enumeration method used to minimize the function φ(a, b) consists in the two-dimensional range of arguments a and b being covered by a mesh with a cell size much smaller than the area under consideration. Then, the values of function φ are calculated at the grid nodes and the smallest of them is selected. The accuracy of this method depends on the cell size.

REFERENCES

  1. Bugromenko, V.N., Transport v territorial’nykh sistemakh (Transport in Territorial Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.

  2. Livshits, V.N., Belousova, N.I., Bushanskii, S.P., Vasil’eva, E.M., and Guk, S.N., The dynamics of technological determinants of natural monopoly transport networks at their optimal development, Audit Fin. Anal., 2011, no. 4, pp. 138–159.

  3. Martynenko, A.V., Wolfram Mathematica software as a universal environment for processing and analyzing geographic information, Geogr. Vestn., 2016, no. 4, pp. 129–138.

  4. Martynenko, A.V. and Petrov, M.B., Influence of surface transportation network on accessibility (by the example of Sverdlovsk oblast), Reg. Issled., 2016, no. 2, pp. 21–30.

  5. Panov, R.D., The evolution of the spatial structure of the world’s largest metro networks, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2020, no. 1, pp. 20–26.

  6. Seliverstov, S.A., Development of indicators of transport provision, Izv. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ. Putei Soobshch., 2015, no. 4, pp. 48–63.

  7. Tarkhov, S.A., Analysis of topological defects of land transport network of Siberian and Far Eastern regions, Reg. Issled., 2019, no. 3, pp. 53–62.

  8. Tarkhov, S.A., Spatial consistency of growth of high-speed railways in the world, Reg. Issled., 2016, no. 4, pp. 90–104.

  9. Tarkhov, S.A., Evolyutsionnaya morfologiya transportnykh setei (Evolutionary Morphology of Transport Networks), Smolensk: Universum, 2006.

  10. Aldous, D. and Shun, J., Connected spatial networks over random points and a route-length statistic, Stat. Sci., 2010, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barthélemy, M., Spatial networks, Phys. Rep., 2011, vol. 499, nos. 1–3, pp. 1–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Böhme, K., Toptsidou, M., Holstein, F., and Martin, D., Territorial Cooperation for the Future of Europe, Luxembourg: ESPON, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haggett, P. and Chorley, R., Network Analysis in Geography, London: Edward Arnold, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kansky, K., Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships Between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nes, R., Design of multimodal transport networks: a hierarchical approach, PhD Thesis, Delft: Tech. Univ. Delft, 2002.

  16. Open street map data extracts. https://www.geofabrik.de. Accessed May 10, 2020.

  17. Xie, F. and Levinson, D., Topological evolution of surface transportation networks, Comput., Environ. Urban Syst., 2009, vol. 33, pp. 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yerra, B. and Levinson, D., The emergence of hierarchy in transportation networks, Ann. Reg. Sci., 2005, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, L. and Levinson, D., A model of the rise and fall of roads, J. Transp. Land Use, 2017, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The article was prepared in accordance with the R&D Plan of Ural State University of Railway Transport (R&D topic no. АААА-А20-120042190035-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Martynenko.

Ethics declarations

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martynenko, A.V. Modeling the morphology of the intercity road network. Reg. Res. Russ. 11, 9–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052101010X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052101010X

Keywords:

Navigation