Skip to main content
Log in

Forest Resources Assessment as an Element of Sustainable Forestry in the Komi Republic

  • REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

According to forest fund accounting data, the Komi Republic ranks first in terms of forest resources in European Russia. However, with the positive dynamics of official accounting indicators, loggers have indicated a decrease in the quality of forest resources in terms of commodity and species composition, specific stock, wood properties, and transport accessibility. This necessitates a more objective assessment of the state of the regional raw material base and possibilities for its improvement, including an assessment of compliance with the principles and criteria of sustainable development. The subject of this study is the state of forest resources in the Komi Republic. Its aim is to assess the state of forest resources and prospects for their use in accordance with the sustainable development criteria in the forestry according to the author’s methodology based on foreign and domestic experience. The scientific novelty here is a new system of indicators adapted to the forest biological and economic conditions of the Komi Republic, based on aggregation and extrapolation methods, including geosystem data analysis. In the study, the forest area where reforestation activities are economically feasible have been determined, as well as their possible economic effect. Taking into account the indicators of the average increase in stock per hectare, average annual growth, and transport accessibility, forest districts were grouped, and the state of forests and outlook were described for each group. Recommendations are made for each group according to their natural and economic characteristics in terms of organizing sustainable forestry and forest use. The results can be applied to draw up Komi Republic forest policy, develop more detailed forecasts, and model forests use scenarios for certain regions of the republic; they can also serve as a methodological basis for the ecological and economic assessment of other forest-rich regions of the Russian Federation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. State report “On the State of the Environment of the Komi Republic in 2018” / Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Komi Republic, GBU RK “TFI RK.” Syktyvkar, 2019.

  2. Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro, 1992. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed February 01, 2018.

  3. Report of the International Conference on the Contribution of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Use: The Way Forward (CICI-2003). 2003. http://www.fao.org/ docrep/005/J0077E/J0077E00.HTM. Accessed February 01, 2018.

  4. The future we want (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on July 27, 2012). 2012. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/ doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/476/12/PDF/N1147612.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed March 01, 2018.

  5. Global forest resources assessment 2015. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4793e.pdf. Accessed February 01, 2018.

  6. System for the Evaluation of the Management of Forests (SEMAFOR). 2017. http://www.fao.org/3/a-mu338e.pdf. Accessed December 29, 2017.

  7. Geoportal of the Komi Republic: natural resource potential. Relevant as of: January 1, 2016. http://gis.rkomi.ru/prp. Accessed October 20, 2017.

  8. Data of the state forest registry of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Komi Republic. http://mpr.rkomi.ru/page/17807. Accessed March 1, 2019.

REFERENCES

  1. Dmitrieva, T.E. and Noskov, V.A., Assessment of wood resources of the Komi Republic, Region, 2009, no. 2, pp. 42–47.

  2. Knize, A.A. and Romanyuk, B.D., Two points of view on Russian forest and forestry, Ustoich. Lesopol’z., 2004, no. 3, pp. 2–7.

  3. Knize, A.A. and Romanyuk, B.D., Two points of view on Russian forest and forestry, Ustoich. Lesopol’z., 2004, no. 4, pp. 21–28.

  4. Korosov, A.V., Rodionov, A.V., Golubev, V.E., et al., A new approach for calculation of the parameters of the allowable logging for sustainable use, Printsypy Ekol., 2014, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lesotaksatsionnyi spravochnik dlya severo-vostoka evropeskoi chasti SSSR: Normativnye materially dlya Arkhangel’skoi, Vologodskoi oblastei i Komi ASSR (Forest Taxation Handbook for the Northeast of the European Part of the USSR: Normative Materials for Arkhangelsk, Vologda Oblasts, and Komi ASSR), Arkhangelsk, 1986.

  6. Lopatin, E.V., Intensity adds value, Lesn. Ind., 2015, no. 4, pp. 12–13.

  7. Mokhirev, A.P. and Dryagin, V.V., Criteria for assessment of sustainable forest management, Aktual’n. Probl. Lesn. Kompl., 2013, no. 37, pp. 19–22.

  8. Noskov, V.A. and Shishelov, M.A., Assessment of the natural capital of forests and the prospective modernization of forestry in the context of a green economy, Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, 2018, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pechatkin, V.V., Evolution of forestry and reforestation in Russia: myths and reality, Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, 2013, no. 2, pp. 161–170.

  10. Khakimulina, T.V. and Yaroshenko, A.Yu., Assessment of the sustainability of forestry based on the analysis of the frequency of change of tree stands. https://ru.fsc.org/preview.a-2062.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2018.

  11. Ekologo-geograficheskie osnovy ratsional’nogo prirodopol’zovaniya v mnogolesnykh raionakh (Ecological and Geographic Principles of Rational Natural Resource Use in Forest-Rich Regions), Pakhuchii, V.V., Ed., Syktyvkar: Inst. Biol., Komi Nauchn. Tsentra, Ural. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacDicken, K.G., Global forest resources assessment 2015: what, why and how? For. Ecol. Manage., 2015, vol. 352, pp. 3–8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112715000572. Accessed May 15, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmithusen, F., Three hundred years of applied sustainability in forestry, Unasylva, 2013, vol. 1. http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3364e/i3364e01.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Kharionovskaya.

Ethics declarations

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharionovskaya, I.V. Forest Resources Assessment as an Element of Sustainable Forestry in the Komi Republic. Reg. Res. Russ. 11, 129–137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052101007X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052101007X

Keywords:

Navigation