Regional Research of Russia

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 258–268 | Cite as

Reindustrialization of the Rural Economy in Zabaikalskii Krai: Pitfalls and Possibilities

  • T. Yu. BogomolovaEmail author
  • O. P. Fadeeva
  • L. M. Faleychik
  • K. V. Shvorina
Regional Development


The article considers the settings, features, and possibilities of reindustrialization (new industrialization) of the rural economy in Zabaikalskii krai. It analyzes the consequences of the collapse of the Soviet agrarian development model in remote regions of Russia, resulting, in particular, in a decline of its agroindustrial complex and chronic losses for local agricultural producers. The paper further describes the pitfalls on the way to a sustainable rural development due to the absence of effective mechanisms necessary to overcome regularly occurring environmental and climatic phenomena, stimulate investment activity, and create competitive advantage. Based on sociological survey data, a range of agribusiness community opinions is presented with respect to the existing problems in the agricultural sector, vital trends and ways of its modernization, and a redesign of its institutional and financial environment, which can boost the development of agribusiness in Zabaikalskii krai. Two approaches are reviewed in the context of reindustrialization of the agroindustrial complex in Zabaikalskii krai. The first presupposes emphasis on attracting large producers capable, at their own expense and with government support, of carrying out industrialization-type investment projects, which will make it possible to reduce dependence on unfavorable weather conditions. The second approach relies on the advantages of a mixed economy, which necessitates the creation of mechanisms for integrating agroindustrial complex enterprises of various levels (small, medium, and large) into the economic external and internal space.


Zabaikalskii krai reindustrialization agroindustrial complex small agribusiness rural development cross-border relations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bodrunov, S.D., Formirovanie strategii reindustrializatsii Rossii (Development of the Strategy of Reindustrialization of Russia), St. Petersburg: Inst. Nov. Ind. Razvit., 2015, part 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geografiya Sibiri v nachale XXI veka. Tom 6. Vostochnaya Sibir’ (Geography of Siberia in the Beginning of 21st Century, Vol. 6: Eastern Siberia), Plyusnin, V.V., Korytnyi, L.M., and Tulokhonov, A.K., Eds., Novosibirsk: Geo, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glazyrina, I.P. and Simonov, E.A., “Ecological civilization” of China: new challenges or new prospects for Russia?, EKO, 2015, no. 7, pp. 52–72.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glazyrina, I.P., Yakovleva, K.A., and Zhadina, N.V., Socioeconomic efficiency of forest management in the Russian regions, Regionalistika, 2015, vol. 2, nos. 5–6, pp. 18–33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhdan, G.V., Shchetinina, I.V., and Voronov, Yu.P., Reindustrialization of the economies of rural territories (a case study of Novosibirsk oblast), Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalugina, Z.I., Nefedkin, V.I., and Fadeeva, O.P., Drivers and barriers of rural reindustrialization, EKO, 2017, no. 1 (511), pp. 20–38.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuleshov, V.V. and Seliverstov, V.E., Program for Reindustrialization of the Novosibirsk Oblast Economy: development ideology and main directions of implementation, Reg. Res. Russ., 2016, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regional’noe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie: diagnostika, planirovanie i monitoring sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Sibiri (Regional and Municipal Governance: Diagnostics, Planning, and Monitoring of Socioeconomic Development of Siberian Regions), Novoselov, A.S. and Seliverstov, V.E., Eds., Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Organ. Prom. Proivod., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seliverstov, V.E., Program for Reindustrialization of the Economy of Novosibirsk Oblast: main outcomes of its development, Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fadeeva, O.P., Border rural areas in Transbaikalia: development or degradation? (Notes of a Sociologist), EKO, 2014, no. 11 (485), pp. 36–54.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong, S., Li, Z., Li, Y., et al., Resources, environment and economic patterns and sustainable development modes of the Silk Road Economic Belt, J. Resour. Ecol., 2015, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glazyrina, I.P., Faleichik, L.M., and Yakovleva, K.A., Socioeconomic effectiveness and “green” growth of regional forest use, Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2015, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glazyrina, I.P. and Zabelina, I.A., The Silk Road Economic Belt and green growth in the east of Russia, J. Resour. Ecol., 2016, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Yu. Bogomolova
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • O. P. Fadeeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. M. Faleychik
    • 3
  • K. V. Shvorina
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsNovosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesChitaRussia

Personalised recommendations