Skip to main content
Log in

Concept of proximity: Foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia

  • Theoretical and Methodological Framework of Spatial Development
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the relatively new concept of proximity. Emerging at the turn of the century in European regional science (economic geography and regional economics), this concept relies on a long-standing tradition of spatial studies (ranging from J. Thünen’s works to regional cluster and urban agglomeration studies). Proximity focuses on the evaluation and analysis of potential interaction between different objects in view of their relative position and similarity in various parameters (social, institutional, organizational, etc.). This concept is similar to that of economic–geographical position; however, since a significantly larger number of factors (spatial, cultural and axiological community, position in social networks, etc.) are considered in the concept of proximity, the authors define it as a multidimensional economic–geographical position. Abroad, the concept of proximity is primarily used within the geography of innovation. In Russia, it is relevant to apply the tools of this concept to study the spatial organization of Russian society not only according to Western tradition (for instance, in the study of territorial clusters and sectoral innovation processes), but also to analyze specific Russian phenomena (dacha migration, otkhodnichestvo, etc.). Furthermore, in the context of Russia’s expansive and sparsely populated territory, the concept of proximity must be reviewed and developed via its dialectical combination with the concept of remoteness used in Arctic studies. For Russia, temporal proximity as a kind of compensation for remoteness factors should be given special importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaev, E.B., Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya. Ponyatiino-terminologicheskii slovar’ (Socioeconomic Geography: Dictionary of Notions and Terms), Moscow: Mysl’, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baranskiy, N.N., Stanovlenie sovetskoi ekonomicheskoi geografii. Izbrannye trudy (Development of Soviet Economic Geography: Selected Research Works), Moscow: Mysl’, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baranskiy, N.N., Economic–geographical position, Geogr. Shkole, 1939, no. 4, pp. 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F., Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey, Ind. Corp. Change, 2001, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 975–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vladimirova, O.V., Regional factors in the formation of economic elites in modern Russia, Mater. XIV mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh “Lomonosov” (Proc. XIV Int. Conf. of Students, Post-Graduate Students, and Young Scientists “Lomonosov”), Aleshkovskii, I.A. and Kostylev, P.N., Eds., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gladkii, Yu.N., Comparative approach to evaluation of geographic position of African countries, in Ekonomicheskaya i sotsial’naya geografiya: problemy i perspektivy (Economic and Social Geography: Problems and Prospects), Leningrad: Geogr. O-vo SSSR, 1984, pp. 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Granovetter, M., Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, Am. J. Sociol., 1985, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dzyuina, G.M., Development of an organizational and economic model of the interaction between innovative firms and major scientific centers, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Tech.) Dissertation, Barnaul, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dmitrieva, T.E., Peripheral location: content, evaluation, and economic means, in Problemy prigranichnykh regionov Rossii (Problems of the Near-Border Regions of Russia), Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004, pp. 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zamyatina, N.Yu. and Yashunskii, A.D., Migration from the North: social networks and mental “proximity,” in Vneekonomicheskie factory prostranstvennogo razvitiya (Non-Economic Factors of Spatial Development), Streletskiy, V.N., Ed., Moscow: Eslan, 2015, pp. 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Development of Altai biopharmaceutical cluster, Sibnovosti. ru, 2014}, March 28. http://barnaul.sibnovosti.ru/business/264556-kak-razvivaetsya-altayskiybiofarmatsevticheskiy-klaster

  12. Maergoiz, I.M., Territorial’naya struktura khozyaistva (Territorial Structure of Economics), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Podvintsev, O.B., Factors of rejection of governors- “varangians” in federal subjects, Mater. X Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Sotsiokul’turnye i prirodno-resursnye factory sbalansirovannosti modernizatsii regionov Rossii,” Perm, 14–17 oktyabrya 2014 g. (Proc. X All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Sociocultural and Naturalresource Factors of Modernization Balance of Russian Regions,” Perm, October 14–17, 2014), Perm: Perm. Gos. Nats. Issled. Univ., 2014, pp. 399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, M.E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free-Press, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Pototskaya, T.I., Mezhdunarodnye yuvelirnye vystavki 2004 g. (2004 International Jewelery Exhibitions), Smolensk: Madzhenta, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sakharov, A.D., Vospominaniya (The Memories), Kholmogorova, E. and Shikhanovich, Yu., Eds., Moscow: Prava Cheloveka, 1996, vol. 1.

  18. Slavin, S.V., Promyshlennoe i transportnoe osvoenie Severa SSSR (Industrial and Transport Development of the North of the Soviet Union), Moscow: Ekonomizdat, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smirnyagin, L.V., The fate of geographical space in the social sciences, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2016, no. 4, pp. 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smirnyagin, L.V., The place instead of location: about the shifts in the fundamental concepts of geography, in Geograficheskoe polozhenie i territorial’nye struktury: pamyati I.M. Maergoiza (Geographical Position and Territorial Structures: In Memoriam of I.M. Maergoiz), Polyan, P.M. and Treivish, A.I., Eds., Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2012, pp. 421–456.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teplova, I.G., Management of interaction of economic subjects in the integrated research and production complex (case study of the Altai Federal Research and Production Center), Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Econ.) Dissertation, Barnaul, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Treivish, A.I., Geospace, information, mobility, and modernization of society, Reg. Issled., 2015, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Treivish, A.I., “Dacha studies” as the science on second homes in the West and in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman, T.L., The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chirikova, A.E., Moscow appointees in the governor’s administration: an analysis of the Samara case, Politiya, 2011, no. 4(63), pp. 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yagol’nitser, M.A., Markov, L.S., and Teplova, I.G., Cooperative interactions in the cluster and their effectiveness (case study of the Altai Federal Research and Production Center), Vestn. Novosib. Gos. Univ., Ser. Sots.-Ekon. Nauki, 2008, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Audretsch, B., Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, in Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998, pp. 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Basile, R., Capello, R., and Caragliu, A., Interregional knowledge spillovers and economic growth: the role of relational proximity, in Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics, Kourtit, K., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011, pp. 21–43.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Berman, M. and Howe, L., Remoteness, transportation infrastructure, and urban-rural population movements in the Arctic, Proc. Int. Conf. “Urbanization of the Arctic,” Nuuk, Greenland, August 2012, Stockholm: Nordregio, 2012, pp. 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boschma, R.A., Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Reg. Stud., 2005, vol. 39, pp. 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., and de Vaan, M., The formation of economic networks: a proximity approach, in Regional Development and Proximity Relations, Torre A. and Wallet, F., Eds., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014, pp. 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Broekel, T., The co-evolution of proximities—a network level study, Reg. Stud., 2015, vol. 49, no. 6, special issue, pp. 921–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Capello, R., Indivisibilities, synergy and proximity: the need for an integrated approach to agglomeration economies, Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2009, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Feldman, M., The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Fetisov, A.S., Distance and intensity of international socioeconomic interactions, IGU Reg. Conf. “Geography, Culture and Society for Our Future Earth,” August 17–21, 2015, Abstracts of Papers, Moscow, 2015, vol. 3701.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hamelin, L.-E., Canadian Nordicity: It’s Your North, Too, Montreal: Harvest House, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hodgson, G.M., Evolution and Institutions. On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  38. How did Silicon Valley become Silicon Valley? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions, A report from Endeavor Insight, July 2014. http://endeavor.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/How-SV-became-SV.pdf.

  39. Huskey, L. and Morehouse, Th.A., Development in remote regions: What do we know? Arctic, 1992, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Morgan, K., The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems, J. Econ. Geogr., 2004, no. 4, pp. 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Porter, M., Locations, clusters, and company strategy, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Clark, G.L., Gertler, M.S., and Feldman, M.P., Eds., Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000, ch. 13, p. 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Regional Development and Proximity Relations, Torre A. and Wallet, F., Eds., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014.

  43. Saxenian, A.-L., Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition on Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Saxenian, A.-L., The New Argonauts. Regional Advantage in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Pres, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Torre, A. and Rallet, A., Proximity and localization, Reg. Stud., 2005, vol. 39, pp. 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Torre, A., On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission, Reg. Stud., 2008, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Torre, A. and Ségolène, D., Land use and soils disposal: From competition to territorial governance (examples from land use conflicts in the greater Paris region), Renewable Agric. Food Syst., 2013, no. 9, pp. 1–12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Yu. Zamyatina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.Yu. Zamyatina, A.N. Pilyasov, 2017, published in Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2017, No. 3, pp. 8–21.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zamyatina, N.Y., Pilyasov, A.N. Concept of proximity: Foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ. 7, 197–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970517030108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970517030108

Keywords

Navigation