Abstract
The article is dedicated to the relatively new concept of proximity. Emerging at the turn of the century in European regional science (economic geography and regional economics), this concept relies on a long-standing tradition of spatial studies (ranging from J. Thünen’s works to regional cluster and urban agglomeration studies). Proximity focuses on the evaluation and analysis of potential interaction between different objects in view of their relative position and similarity in various parameters (social, institutional, organizational, etc.). This concept is similar to that of economic–geographical position; however, since a significantly larger number of factors (spatial, cultural and axiological community, position in social networks, etc.) are considered in the concept of proximity, the authors define it as a multidimensional economic–geographical position. Abroad, the concept of proximity is primarily used within the geography of innovation. In Russia, it is relevant to apply the tools of this concept to study the spatial organization of Russian society not only according to Western tradition (for instance, in the study of territorial clusters and sectoral innovation processes), but also to analyze specific Russian phenomena (dacha migration, otkhodnichestvo, etc.). Furthermore, in the context of Russia’s expansive and sparsely populated territory, the concept of proximity must be reviewed and developed via its dialectical combination with the concept of remoteness used in Arctic studies. For Russia, temporal proximity as a kind of compensation for remoteness factors should be given special importance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alaev, E.B., Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya. Ponyatiino-terminologicheskii slovar’ (Socioeconomic Geography: Dictionary of Notions and Terms), Moscow: Mysl’, 1983.
Baranskiy, N.N., Stanovlenie sovetskoi ekonomicheskoi geografii. Izbrannye trudy (Development of Soviet Economic Geography: Selected Research Works), Moscow: Mysl’, 1980.
Baranskiy, N.N., Economic–geographical position, Geogr. Shkole, 1939, no. 4, pp. 24–34.
Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F., Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey, Ind. Corp. Change, 2001, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 975–1005.
Vladimirova, O.V., Regional factors in the formation of economic elites in modern Russia, Mater. XIV mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh “Lomonosov” (Proc. XIV Int. Conf. of Students, Post-Graduate Students, and Young Scientists “Lomonosov”), Aleshkovskii, I.A. and Kostylev, P.N., Eds., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2007.
Gladkii, Yu.N., Comparative approach to evaluation of geographic position of African countries, in Ekonomicheskaya i sotsial’naya geografiya: problemy i perspektivy (Economic and Social Geography: Problems and Prospects), Leningrad: Geogr. O-vo SSSR, 1984, pp. 127–145.
Granovetter, M., Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, Am. J. Sociol., 1985, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 481–510.
Dzyuina, G.M., Development of an organizational and economic model of the interaction between innovative firms and major scientific centers, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Tech.) Dissertation, Barnaul, 2004.
Dmitrieva, T.E., Peripheral location: content, evaluation, and economic means, in Problemy prigranichnykh regionov Rossii (Problems of the Near-Border Regions of Russia), Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004, pp. 43–49.
Zamyatina, N.Yu. and Yashunskii, A.D., Migration from the North: social networks and mental “proximity,” in Vneekonomicheskie factory prostranstvennogo razvitiya (Non-Economic Factors of Spatial Development), Streletskiy, V.N., Ed., Moscow: Eslan, 2015, pp. 147–173.
Development of Altai biopharmaceutical cluster, Sibnovosti. ru, 2014}, March 28. http://barnaul.sibnovosti.ru/business/264556-kak-razvivaetsya-altayskiybiofarmatsevticheskiy-klaster
Maergoiz, I.M., Territorial’naya struktura khozyaistva (Territorial Structure of Economics), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.
Podvintsev, O.B., Factors of rejection of governors- “varangians” in federal subjects, Mater. X Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Sotsiokul’turnye i prirodno-resursnye factory sbalansirovannosti modernizatsii regionov Rossii,” Perm, 14–17 oktyabrya 2014 g. (Proc. X All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Sociocultural and Naturalresource Factors of Modernization Balance of Russian Regions,” Perm, October 14–17, 2014), Perm: Perm. Gos. Nats. Issled. Univ., 2014, pp. 399–402.
Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1985.
Porter, M.E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free-Press, 1990.
Pototskaya, T.I., Mezhdunarodnye yuvelirnye vystavki 2004 g. (2004 International Jewelery Exhibitions), Smolensk: Madzhenta, 2005.
Sakharov, A.D., Vospominaniya (The Memories), Kholmogorova, E. and Shikhanovich, Yu., Eds., Moscow: Prava Cheloveka, 1996, vol. 1.
Slavin, S.V., Promyshlennoe i transportnoe osvoenie Severa SSSR (Industrial and Transport Development of the North of the Soviet Union), Moscow: Ekonomizdat, 1961.
Smirnyagin, L.V., The fate of geographical space in the social sciences, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2016, no. 4, pp. 7–19.
Smirnyagin, L.V., The place instead of location: about the shifts in the fundamental concepts of geography, in Geograficheskoe polozhenie i territorial’nye struktury: pamyati I.M. Maergoiza (Geographical Position and Territorial Structures: In Memoriam of I.M. Maergoiz), Polyan, P.M. and Treivish, A.I., Eds., Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2012, pp. 421–456.
Teplova, I.G., Management of interaction of economic subjects in the integrated research and production complex (case study of the Altai Federal Research and Production Center), Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Econ.) Dissertation, Barnaul, 2004.
Treivish, A.I., Geospace, information, mobility, and modernization of society, Reg. Issled., 2015, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 37–48.
Treivish, A.I., “Dacha studies” as the science on second homes in the West and in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 179–188.
Friedman, T.L., The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007.
Chirikova, A.E., Moscow appointees in the governor’s administration: an analysis of the Samara case, Politiya, 2011, no. 4(63), pp. 61–73.
Yagol’nitser, M.A., Markov, L.S., and Teplova, I.G., Cooperative interactions in the cluster and their effectiveness (case study of the Altai Federal Research and Production Center), Vestn. Novosib. Gos. Univ., Ser. Sots.-Ekon. Nauki, 2008, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 68–76.
Audretsch, B., Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, in Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998, pp. 18–29.
Basile, R., Capello, R., and Caragliu, A., Interregional knowledge spillovers and economic growth: the role of relational proximity, in Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics, Kourtit, K., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011, pp. 21–43.
Berman, M. and Howe, L., Remoteness, transportation infrastructure, and urban-rural population movements in the Arctic, Proc. Int. Conf. “Urbanization of the Arctic,” Nuuk, Greenland, August 2012, Stockholm: Nordregio, 2012, pp. 108–122.
Boschma, R.A., Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Reg. Stud., 2005, vol. 39, pp. 61–74.
Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., and de Vaan, M., The formation of economic networks: a proximity approach, in Regional Development and Proximity Relations, Torre A. and Wallet, F., Eds., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014, pp. 243–266.
Broekel, T., The co-evolution of proximities—a network level study, Reg. Stud., 2015, vol. 49, no. 6, special issue, pp. 921–935.
Capello, R., Indivisibilities, synergy and proximity: the need for an integrated approach to agglomeration economies, Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2009, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 145–159.
Feldman, M., The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer, 1994.
Fetisov, A.S., Distance and intensity of international socioeconomic interactions, IGU Reg. Conf. “Geography, Culture and Society for Our Future Earth,” August 17–21, 2015, Abstracts of Papers, Moscow, 2015, vol. 3701.
Hamelin, L.-E., Canadian Nordicity: It’s Your North, Too, Montreal: Harvest House, 1979.
Hodgson, G.M., Evolution and Institutions. On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.
How did Silicon Valley become Silicon Valley? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions, A report from Endeavor Insight, July 2014. http://endeavor.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/How-SV-became-SV.pdf.
Huskey, L. and Morehouse, Th.A., Development in remote regions: What do we know? Arctic, 1992, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 128–137.
Morgan, K., The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems, J. Econ. Geogr., 2004, no. 4, pp. 3–21.
Porter, M., Locations, clusters, and company strategy, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Clark, G.L., Gertler, M.S., and Feldman, M.P., Eds., Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000, ch. 13, p. 253–274.
Regional Development and Proximity Relations, Torre A. and Wallet, F., Eds., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014.
Saxenian, A.-L., Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition on Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1994.
Saxenian, A.-L., The New Argonauts. Regional Advantage in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Pres, 2006.
Torre, A. and Rallet, A., Proximity and localization, Reg. Stud., 2005, vol. 39, pp. 47–59.
Torre, A., On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission, Reg. Stud., 2008, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 869–889.
Torre, A. and Ségolène, D., Land use and soils disposal: From competition to territorial governance (examples from land use conflicts in the greater Paris region), Renewable Agric. Food Syst., 2013, no. 9, pp. 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © N.Yu. Zamyatina, A.N. Pilyasov, 2017, published in Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2017, No. 3, pp. 8–21.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamyatina, N.Y., Pilyasov, A.N. Concept of proximity: Foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ. 7, 197–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970517030108
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970517030108