Skip to main content
Log in

Agglomerated settlement pattern: identification and accounting

  • Urban Geography
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The approaches to distinguishing urban agglomerations are analyzed. The authors assert that in Russian science a substitution of concepts exists: only major urban agglomerations are considered instead of the total number of urban agglomerations; as a result, the number of urban agglomerations in Russia is much underestimated. The known methods are too strict, complicated, and obsolete. It is proposed to switch over to the approach used in statistical studies in the United States. This approach is based on identifying so-called “standard metropolitan statistical areas” and makes it possible to identify “metropolitan” and “micropolitan” municipal districts in the oblasts of Central Russia. This identification is based on grouping of municipal districts according to classes of the centers of districts. The districts whose centers are mid-size towns or bigger cities are considered metropolitan. The districts with sub-mid-size towns as centers are considered micropolitan. The centers have been grouped using the “peak achieved population size” principle proposed earlier by the authors, which makes it possible to avoid the strict dependency of classification of the centers of districts by changes in population.

The location of metropolitan and micropolitan districts makes it possible to obtain a clear representation about the territorial and urban structure of the studied region. The combination of this structure with the main railroad network shows that metropolitan and micropolitan districts are either located at railroad hubs or form banded structures along key directions. The above statements point to the formation of an agglomerated-network structure of territory. The data on the number of metropolitan and micropolitan districts and their share in the total number of municipal districts, territory, and population of central Russia are provided. Since a lot of municipal districts have a large territory, it is proposed to include in the metropolitan approach the concept of reachability of the center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidovich, V.G., Settlement pattern in suburban areas: quantitative pattern, in Vopr. Geogr., Sb. 87: Rasselenie v prigorodnykh zonakh (Problems of Geography, vol. 87: Settlement pattern in suburban areas), Moscow: Mysl’, 1971, pp. 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kovalev, S.A., Typology of suburban areas, Vopr. Geogr., Sb. 87: Rasselenie v prigorodnykh zonakh (Problems of Geography, vol. 87: Settlement pattern in suburban areas), Moscow: Mysl’, 1971, pp. 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuznetsov, D.V., Modern features of metropolitenization in United States, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leizerovich, E.E., Ekonomicheskie mikroraiony Rossii (setka i tipologiya) (Economic Small Areas of Russia: Network and Types), Moscow: Trilobit, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maergoyz, I.M. and Lappo, G.M., Geography and urbanization, Vopr. Geogr., Sb. 96: Urbanizatsiya mira (Problems of Geography, vol. 96: Urbanization of the World), Moscow: Mysl’, 1974, pp. 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Polyan, P.M., Metodika vydeleniya i analiza opornogo karkasa rasseleniya (A Method of Identification and Analysis of Framework of Settlement Pattern), Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1988, part 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Regional’noe razvitie i regional’naya politika v Rossii v perekhodnyi period (Regional Development and Regional Policy in Russia during Transitional Period), Artobolevskii, S.S. and Glezer, O.B., Eds., Moscow: Bauman Mosk. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Selivanova, T.I., Geographical features of urban agglomeration process in Post-Soviet period, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smirnyagin, L.V., Settlement pattern in Russia: trends for changes, in Gorodskoi al’manakh (City Anthology), Moscow: Fond Inst. Ekon. Goroda, 2009, no. 4, pp. 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tkachenko, A.A. and Fomkina, A.A., A province of Central Russia: experience of formal identification, in Rossiiskaya glubinka: modeli i metody izucheniya (Russian Province: Models and Analysis Methods), Moscow: Eslan, 2012, pp. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farkov, A.G., Agglomeration network structure of settlement pattern: new opportunities for the south of Siberia, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2007, no. 2, pp. 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kharitonov, V.M., Urbanizatsiya v SShA (Urbanization in the United States), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Tkachenko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Tkachenko, A.A. Fomkina, 2014, published in Izvestiya Russkogo Geograficheskogo Obshchestva, 2014, Vol. 146, No. 5, pp. 48–56.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tkachenko, A.A., Fomkina, A.A. Agglomerated settlement pattern: identification and accounting. Reg. Res. Russ. 5, 173–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515020124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515020124

Keywords

Navigation