Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Cultural branch” of human geography in contemporary Russia: Genesis, main peculiarities, and priorities of development

  • Cultural Geography
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the historical origins, specific features, development trends, and key issues, as well as priority areas and prospects for development, of the cultural and geographic branch of Russian human geography. In the global academic landscape, this discipline is known as cultural geography. Two concepts are used on the national research scene: geography of culture or cultural geography. The relationship between these two concepts is discussed. The paper analyzes how anthropological and cultural traditions inherited from the pre-Soviet period of Russian geographic science and the research approaches of anthropogeography of the early Soviet period have influenced the field of cultural geographic research in Russia. The consequences of the period of oblivion of humanistic traditions in Russian anthropogeography, which marked the end of the 1920s-beginning of the 1930s, for the development of economic geography in the USSR are investigated. The orientation of national human geography toward the cultural geographic dimension at the end of the last century is explored. Key features and development trends that were characteristic of Russian geography of culture or cultural geography over the past quarter-century are discussed. Statistical data on dissertations in the field of geoculture between 1995 and 2012 in Russia are aggregated and analyzed. Special attention is paid to the assessment of major problems and priority areas of cultural and geographic research in view of general trends and prospects for the development of modern human geography in Russia. It is concluded that the potential of cultural geography in Russia has not yet been fully tapped into. The theoretical and methodological framework of cultural geography should be developed further. In addition, research in this area is highly fragmented and suffers from a lack of coordination and dissociation with other areas of human geography. The authors point to the rise of “neoculturalization” in national geographic science, which is based on a closer relationship of geography of culture and cultural geography with other disciplines of human geography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agafonov, N.T., The principles and main tasks of the Soviet social geography, Izv. Vses. Geogr. O-va, 1984, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baranskii, N.N., Compilation of the series of economic-geographic monographs in the republics and oblasts, in Ekonomicheskaya geografiya. Ekonomicheskaya kartografiya (Economic Geography. Economic Cartography), Moscow: Geografgiz, 1960, pp. 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, L.S., The subject and objectives of geography, Izv. Imper. Russ. Geogr. O-va, 1915, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 463–475.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogoraz-Tan, V.G., Rasprostranenie kul’tury po Zemle. Osnovy antropogeografii (Global Distribution of Culture. Foundations of Anthropogenic Geography), Moscow: Gosizdat, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vedenin, Yu.A., Problem of formation of cultural landscape and its study, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr., 1990, no. 1, pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gladkii, Yu.N., Gumanitarnaya geografiya. Nauchnaya eksplikatsiya (Human Geography. Scientific Explication), St. Petersburg: S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gokhman, V.M., Relationship between theory and practice in modern geography, in Osnovnye ponyatiya, modeli i metody obshchegeograficheskikh issledovanii (Main Definitions, Models, and Methods of General Geographical Studies), Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1984, pp. 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gokhman, V.M., Human geography: principles and structure, Vopr. Geogr., 1984, nos. 122/123, pp. 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gumanitarnaya geografiya (Humanitarian Geography), Moscow: Inst. Naslediya, 2004–2010, nos. 1–6.

  10. Dmitrevskaya, N.F. and Dmitrevskii, Yu.D., Geography of culture and new political thinking, in Geografiya, politika i kul’tura (Geography, Policy, and Culture), Leningrad: Nauka, 1990, pp. 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Druzhinin, A.G., Methodological principles of geographical studies of culture, Izv. Vses. Geogr. O-va, 1989, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Druzhinin, A.G., Geography of culture: some aspects of formation of new scientific direction, Izv. Vses. Geogr. O-va, 1989, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Druzhinin, A.G., Theoretical and methodological principles of geographical studies of culture, Doctoral (Geogr.) Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Druzhinin, A.G., Teoreticheskie osnovy geografii kul’tury (Theoretical Foundations of Geography of Culture), Rostov-on-Don: Sev.-Kavk. Nauchn. Tsentr, Vysshei Shkoly, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Druzhinin, A.G., Russian human geography at the beginning of the 21st century: old problems and new challenges, Ekon.-Geogr. Vestn. Yuzhn. Fed. Univ., 2008, no. 5, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Druzhinin, A.G., From humanization to neohumanization of Russian socio-economic geography: trends, problems, and priorities, Yuzh.-Ross. Forum: Ekon., Sotsiol., Politiol., Sots.-Ekon. Geogr., 2011, no. 1 (2), pp. 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Druzhinin, A.G., Demographical and economic dynamics of southern regions of Russia: long-term and new trends in Russian and global context, Yuzh.-Ross. Forum: Ekon., Sotsiol., Politol., Sots.-Ekon. Geogr., 2012, no. 1 (4), pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Druzhinin, A.G., New conceptualization of Eurasia: a view of human geographer, Vestn. Assots. Ross. Geogr.-Obshchestvoved., 2013, no. 2, pp. 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhivopisnaya Rossiya. Otechestvo nashe v ego zemel’nom, istoricheskom, plemennom, ekonomicheskom i bytovom znachenii (Pictorial Russia: Our Homeland in His Land, Historical, Tribal, Economic, and Household Values), Semenov, P.P., Ed., St. Petersburg: Vol’f”, 1881–1901, vols. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zamyatin, D.N., Modelirovanie geograficheskikh obrazov: Prostranstvo gumanitarnoi geografii (Modeling of Geographical Images: The Space of Humanitarian Geography), Smolensk: Oikumena, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zamyatin, D.N., Gumanitarnaya geografiya: prostranstvo i yazyk geograficheskikh obrazov (Humanitarian Geography: Space and Idiomatic Order of Geographical Images), St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zamyatin, D.N., Space as the image and transaction: to establishment of geonomics, Obshchestv. Nauki and Sovrem., 2008, no. 2, pp. 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zamyatina, N.Yu. and Mitin, I.I., Humanitarian geography, in Bol’shaya Rossiiskaya Entsiklopediya (The Great Russian Encyclopedia), Moscow: Bol’shaya Rossiiskaya Entsiklopediya, 2007, vol. 8, p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kabo, R.M., Relationship of nature and a man as the subject of sociocultural geography, Vopr. Geogr., 1947, no. 5, pp. 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaganskii, V.L., Kul’turnyi landshaft i sovetskoe obitaemoe prostranstvo (Cultural Landscape and Soviet Inhabited Space), Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kalutskov, V.N., Landshaft v kul’turnoi geografii (Landscape in Cultural Geography), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Castells, M., The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kruber, A.A., Obshchee zemlevedenie. Bio- i antropogeografiya (General Earth Science. Biogeography and Anthropogeography), Moscow: Gosizdat, 1922, part 3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Krylov, M.P., Regional’naya identichnost’ v Evropeiskoi Rossii (Regional Identity in European Russia), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kul’turnaya geografiya (Cultural Geography), Vedenin, Yu.A. and Turovskii, R.F., Eds., Moscow: Inst. Naslediya, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lavrenova, O.A., Prostranstva i smysly: semantika kul’turnogo landshafta (Spaces and Senses: Semantics of Cultural Landscape), Moscow: Inst. Naslediya, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lavrov, S.B., Formation of social geography: imaginary contradictions and real problems, in Sotsial’naya geografiya Kaliningradskoi oblasti (Social Geography of Kaliningrad Oblast), Kaliningrad: Kaliningr. Gos. Univ., 1982, pp. 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lavrov, S.B., Integrational trends in geography, in Sovetskaya geografiya (Soviet Geography), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984, pp. 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lersaryan, T., Boundless plain of the end of times, Otechestvennye Zap., 2002, no. 3, pp. 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Manakov, A.G., Geokul’turnoe prostranstvo Severozapada Russkoi ravniny: dinamika, struktura, ierarkhiya (Geocultural Space of the Northwestern Russian Plain: Dynamics, Structure, and Hierarchy), Pskov: Tsentr Vozrozhdenie, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Manakov, A.G., Na styke tsivilizatsii: Etnokul’turnaya geografiya Zapada Rossii i stran Baltii (In the Turn of Civilizations: Ethnocultural Geography of Western Russia and Baltic Countries), Pskov: Pskov. Gos. Pedagog. Inst., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Markaryan, E.S., Teoriya kul’tury i sovremennaya nauka (Theory of Culture and Modern Science), Moscow: Mysl’, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mezhevich, M.N., Territorial community as the object of social planning, in Planirovanie sotsial’nogo razvitiya gorodov (Planning of Social Development of Cities), Moscow: Inst. Sotsiol. Issled., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1975, no. 2, pp. 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mezhuev, V.M., Culture as the philosophic problem, in Kul’tura, chelovek, i kartina mira (Culture, a Man, and Image of the World), Leningrad: Nauka, 1990, pp. 320–335.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mitin, I.I., Kompleksnye geograficheskie kharakteristiki. Mnozhestvennye real’nosti mest i semiozis prostranstvennykh mifov (Complex Geographic Characteristics. Multiple Realities of Places and Semiosis of Spatial Myths), Smolensk: Oikumena, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mitin, I.I., Cultural geography in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia: history of recovery and factors of originality, Mezhd. Zh. Issled. Kul’t., 2011, no. 4 (5), pp. 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nefedova, T.G., Russian periphery as the socioeconomic phenomenon, Reg. Issled., 2008, no. 5, pp. 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Novikov, A.V., Cultural geography as an interpretation of territory, in Voprosy ekonomicheskoi i politicheskoi geografii zarubezhnykh stran (Problems of Economic and Political Geography of Foreign Countries), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1993, no. 13, pp. 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Prostranstvo sovremennoi Rossii: vozmozhnosti i bar’ery razvitiya (razmyshleniya geografov-obshchestvovedov) (The Space of Modern Russia: Possibilities and Barriers of Development (Reflections of Human Geographers), Druzhinin, A.G., Kolosov, V.A., and Shuvalov, V.E., Eds., Moscow: Vuzovskaya Kniga, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ragulina, M.V., Kul’turnaya geografiya: teorii, metody, regional’nyi sintez (Cultural Geography: Theories, Methods, and Regional Synthesis), Irkutsk: Inst. Geogr., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rossiya. Polnoe geograficheskoe opisanie nashego Otechestva (Russia: Integrated Geographical Description of Our Homeland), Semenov-Tyan-Shansky, V.P., Ed., St. Petersburg: Izd. A.F. Devriena, 1899–1914.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saushkin, Yu.G., Cultural landscape, Vopr. Geogr., 1946, no. 1, pp. 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saushkin, Yu.G., Ekonomicheskaya geografiya: istoriya, teoriya, metody, praktika (Economic Geography: History, Theory, Methods, and Practice), Moscow: Mysl’, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky, V.P., How is reflected geographic landscape in folk names? Zemlevedenie, 1924, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 133–158.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky, V.P., Zhto dolzhen znat’ kraeved o geografii cheloveka? (What Researcher of Local Lore Must Know about Geography of a Man?), Leningrad: Brokgauz i Efron, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky, V.P., Raion i strana (Region and Country), Moscow: Gosizdat, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sinitskii, L.D., Ocherki zemlevedeniya (Antropogeografiya) (Essays on Earth Science: Anthropogeography), Moscow: Kniga, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sokolova, A.A., Landshaft v sisteme traditsionnykh prostranstvennykh predstavlenii: geograficheskaya interpretatsiya dialektnykh obrazov (Landscape in the System of Traditional Spatial Concepts: Geographic Interpretation of Dialectal Images), St. Petersburg: Leningr. Gos. Univ. im. A.S. Pushkina, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sokolova, A.A., Humanitarian geography: delimitation of the subject area, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2011, no. 5, pp. 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Streletskiy, V.N., Ethnic settlement patterns and geography of culture, in SSSR — SNG — Rossiya: geografiya naseleniya i sotsial’naya geografiya.1985–1996. Analitiko-bibliograficheskii obzor (The Soviet Union — CIS — Russia: Social Geography and Geography of Population. 1985–1996. Analytical Bibliographical Review), Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001, pp. 396–466.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Streletskiy, V.N., Geographical space and culture: theoretical attitudes and scientific paradigms in cultural geography, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2002, no. 4, pp. 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Streletskiy, V.N., Culture as geographical reality and scientific traditions in cultural geography, in Pyatye Sokraticheskie chteniya “Refleksivnost’ sotsial’nykh protsessov i adekvatnost’ nauchnykh metodov” (Fifth Socrates Conference “Reflexivity of Social Processes and Conformity of Scientific Methods”), Shuper, V.A., Ed., Moscow: Eslan, 2004, pp. 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Streletskiy, V.N., Cultural geography in Russia: peculiarities of formation and paths of development, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2008, no. 5, pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Streletskiy, V.N., From anthropogeography to cultural geography: succession in development and new avenues of research, in Kul’turnye landshafty Rossii i ustoichivoe razvitie (Cultural Landscapes of Russia and Sustainable Development), Krasovskaya, T.M., Ed., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2009, pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Streletskiy, V.N., Cultural regionalism in Germany and Russia, Doctoral (Geogr.) Dissertation, Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sushchii, S.Ya. and Druzhinin, A.G., Ocherki geografii russkoi kul’tury (Essays of Geography of Russian Culture), Rostov-on-Don: Sev.-Kavk. Nauchn. Tsentr, Vysshei Shkoly, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tkachenko, A.A., Territorial community in the system of notions of geography of population, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr., 1982, no. 4, pp. 94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Treivish, A.I., Gorod, raion, strana, i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda (City, Region, Country, and the World. Development of Russia by the View of Geographer), Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Treivish, A.I., How should you call us? Vestn. Assots. Ross. Geogr.-Obshchestvoved., 2012, no. 1, pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Turovskii, R.F., Kul’turnye landshafty Rossii (Cultural Landscapes of Russia), Moscow: Inst. Naslediya, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Fenomen kul’tury v rossiiskoi obshchestvennoi geografii: ekspertnye mneniya, analitika, kontsepty (Phenomenon of Culture in Russian Human Geography: Expert Opinions, Analytics, and Ideas), Druzhinin, A.G. and Streletskiy, V.N., Eds., Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhn. Fed. Univ., 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Harvey, D., Explanation in Geography, London: Edward Arnold, 1969. (Russ. Ed.: Kharvei D., Nauchnoe obyasnenie v geografii (Scientific Explanation in Geography). Moscow: Progress (Publ.), 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Claval, P., Postmodernisme et géographies, Géogr. Cult., 1999, no. 4, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Harvey, D., The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Soja, E., Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory, London: Verso, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North Caucasus Research Institute of Economic and Social Problems, South Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

    A. G. Druzhinin

  2. Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    V. N. Streletskiy

Authors
  1. A. G. Druzhinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. N. Streletskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Druzhinin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.G. Druzhinin, V.N. Streletskiy, 2015, published in Izvestiya RAN. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2015, No. 1, pp. 5–20.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Druzhinin, A.G., Streletskiy, V.N. “Cultural branch” of human geography in contemporary Russia: Genesis, main peculiarities, and priorities of development. Reg. Res. Russ. 5, 73–82 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515010049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515010049

Keywords

Search

Navigation