Regional Research of Russia

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 198–205 | Cite as

The Ob-Irtysh basin: Socio-economic problems

  • V. A. VasilenkoEmail author
Geography of Nature Management


The article describes increasing impact of economic activities on the water resources of the Ob-Irtysh basin, which generates many problems that require an urgent solution. The situations associated with the water supply of the needs of the population and economy, as well as the necessity of environmental preservation, have been analyzed. Particular attention is given to the issues of reconciling of interests of several states (Russia, Kazakhstan, and China) using the flow of the Irtysh river. The question of the reasonability of establishing a legislative framework that enables the exercising of the effective control of transboundary water resources and provides ecological and economic security has been raised. The anthropogenic and natural factors that influence the water-resource status and the impact of poor water quality on health have been considered. The basic difficulties of the practical solution of challenges have been determined and certain potential external and internal threats have been shown.


Ob-Irtysh basin the effects of economic activity natural-climatic factors the use of transboundary water resources river flow water quality health 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kuznetsova, A.N., Some aspects of economic use of Baikal Lake and Baikal natural area, Reg. Ekon. Sotsiol., 2011, no. 3, pp. 269–271.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The order of the Government of Russian Federation on August 27, 2009 no. 1235-r “On approval of water strategy of Russian Federation until 2020,” in Sobranie zakonodatel’stv RF (Collection of Legislative Acts of Russian Federation), 2009, no. 36, art. 4362.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seliverstov, M.V., Water resource potential and use in Ural, Siberian, and Far Eastern regions, Vestn. Soveta Bezop. Ross. Fed., 2012, no. 4, pp. 102–107.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The results of the work of expert subcommittee of the State Expert Commission of the State Planning Commission of USSR on technical and economic substantiation of the urgent transfer of the part of the flows of Siberian rivers to the Central Asia and Kazakhstan (September 20, 2918), Zelenyi Mir, 2002, nos. 11–12, p. 10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frolov, A.V., Development of the system of hydrometeorological (water) security of Ural, Siberia, and Far East, Vestn. Soveta Bezop. Ross. Fed., 2012, no. 4, pp. 108–117.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porfir’ev, B.N., Nature and economics: risks of interaction, in Ekologo-ekonomicheskie ocherki (Ecological and Economical Essays), Ivanter, V.V., Ed., Moscow: Ankil, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurtov, A.A., Projects of new channels: potential for cooperation or hidden treat for Russian interests? Probl. Nats. Strateg., 2012, no. 4, pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemeshev, M., Maksimov, A., and Maslov, B., The obstacles for trade of water-containing products, Observer, 2011, no. 2, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kronikh, G., Residents drink dangerous water. Cited February 3, 2013.
  10. 10.
    Pashchenko, S., Mercury in an ocean: will our rivers be the reason of international scandal? Argumenty i Fakty, 2012, Jun. 6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bychkov, V.G., Krylov, G.G., and Plotnikov, A.O., Opisthorchosis in Ob-Irtysh basin: problems of etiology and pathogenesis, Med. Parazitol. Parazit. Bolezni, 2007, no. 4, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pal’tsev, A.I., System approach to the repeated disease, Nauka iz Pervykh Ruk, 2008, no. 2, pp. 22–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations