Advertisement

Biology Bulletin Reviews

, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp 335–346 | Cite as

Biological signaling field in mammals (for 110th Anniversary of Professor N.P. Naumov)

  • E. A. Vanisova
  • A. A. Nikol’skii
Article

Abstract

The main propositions of the biological signaling field concept suggested by the author of concept N.P. Naumov and his followers are discussed in this review based on the example of mammals. It has been shown that the development of this concept over the last 30 years has been based on its fundamental proposition. The main idea is that, from generation to generation, mammals leave traces of their life activity at landscape objects in a biogeocenosis space and form a matrix of stable elements, i.e., a system of attractors, which are objects that attract attention from animals and their usage of a territory with all its resources. The stable elements establish a visual-olfactory image of the territory, which influences the trajectory of each new generation of mammals. It has been suggested that, because it is similar to biological productivity and species diversity, the field of biological signaling field has consistent stages of ecological succession. Although this concept has not become widespread, in recent years, studies based on its fundamental propositions have been published regularly. A necessary condition of the further successful development of the concept is the establishment of new research methods, including the simulation of the processes of the formation of a matrix of stable elements under experimental conditions.

Keywords

Life Activity Brown Bear Biology Bulletin Review Signaling Field Stable Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albaret, M., Péroux, R., Gaillard, J.-M., and Lartiges, A., Les relevés d’indices de presence comme indicateur des variations d’effectif chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus), Gibier Faune Sauvage, 1991, vol. 8, pp. 231–250.Google Scholar
  2. Bibikov, D.I., Gornye surki Srednei Azii i Kazakhstana (Mountain Marmot of Central Asia and Kazakhstan), Moscow: Nauka, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Blidchenko, E.Yu., A pattern of formation of biological signaling field of mammals in Tver’ oblast, in IX S”ezd Teriol. O-va, Ross. Akad. Nauk “Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii” (IX Congr. Theriological Soc. “Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories”), Moscow: KMK, 2011, p. 59.Google Scholar
  4. Bunevich, A.N., Stationary distribution and population structure of wolves in Belovezhskaya pushcha, in Ekologiya, povedenie i upravlenie populyatsiyami volka (Ecology, Behavior, and Management of Wolf Populations), Moscow: Inst. Evol. Morfol. Ekol. Zhivotn., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1989, pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
  5. Danilov, P.I., Kan’shiev, V.Ya., and Fedorov, F.V., Rechnye bobry Evropeiskogo severa Rossii (River Beavers of European North of Russia), Moscow: Nauka, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Fedosenko, A.K., Zhiryakov, V.A., and Grachev, Yu.A., The data on ecology and behavior of wolf in the Northern Tien Shan and Dzhungar Alatau, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1978, vol. 83(3), pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
  7. Fokina, M.E., Kamalova, E.S., and Lapuzina, V.V., Analiz biotichekikh vzaimosvyazei enotovidnoi sobaki v usloviyakh introduktsii (Analysis of Biotic Relationships of Introduced Racoon Dog), Miass: Ur. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010, pp. 205–207.Google Scholar
  8. Gaiduk, V.E., Winter routs of animals as the elements of biofields in ecosystems, in Vsesouz. Soveshch. “Kommunikativnye mekhanizmy regulirovaniya populyatsionnoi struktury u mlekopitayushchikh (All-Union Meeting on Communicative Regulatory Mechanisms of Population Structure of Mammals), Moscow: Inst. Evol. Morfol. Ekol. Zhivotn., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1988, pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
  9. Gol’tsman, M.E. and Kruchenkova, E.P., Attractors in social behavior, in Shestoi s”ezd Teriol. O-va, Tezisy dokladov, Moskva, 1–16 aprelya 1999 g. (Sixth Congr. Theriol. Soc., Abstracts of Papers, Moscow, April 1–16, 1999), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Ekol. Evol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1999, p. 61.Google Scholar
  10. Gromov, V.S., Etologicheskie mekhanizmy populyatsionnogo gomeostaza u peschanok (Mammalia, Rodentia) (Ethological Mechanisms of Populational Homeostasis of Gerbils (Mammalia, Rodentia)), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Ekol. Evol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. Hediger, H., Beobachtung zur Tierpsychology in Zoo und im Zirkus, Basel: Reinhardt, 1961.Google Scholar
  12. Kawamichi, T., Vocalization of Ochotona as a taxonomic character, in Proc. the World Lagomorph Conference, Maers, K. and McInnes, C.D., Eds., Ontario: Guelph Univ. Press, 1981, pp. 572–586.Google Scholar
  13. Kohler, W., Gestalt Psychology, New York: Harcourt Brace, 1929.Google Scholar
  14. Kucherenko, S.P., Tigr (The Tiger), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. Kudryashov, V.S., The factors which regulate the population dynamics of river beavers in Okskii Reserve, in Mlekopitayushchie: Chislennost’, ee dinamika i factory, ikh opredelyayushchie (Mammals: Population Number, Dynamics, and Key Factors), Ryazan: Okskii Zapoved., 1975, pp. 5–125.Google Scholar
  16. Likhatskii, Yu.P., Ekologiya soobshchestv kopytnykh zhivotnykh Russkoi lesostepi (Ecology of Hoofed Animals of Russian Forest Steppe), Voronezh: BIOMIK, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. Likhatskii, Yu.P., Bibikov, D.I., and Ryabov, L.S., A wolf (Canis lupus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Voronezh Reserve, Zool. Zh., 1995, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 110–120.Google Scholar
  18. Lisitsyna, T.Yu., Structure of seal-rookery and social behavior of eared seals, in Ekologiya, struktura populyatsii i vnutrividovye kommunikativnye protsessy u mlekopitayushchikh (Ecology, Structure of Populations, and Intraspecific Communications between Mammals), Moscow: Nauka, 1981, pp. 99–150.Google Scholar
  19. Lisitsyna, T.Yu., Seal-rookery of northern fur seals as the biological signaling field, in Vsesoyuz. Soveshch. “Kommunikativnye mekhanizmy regulirovaniya populyatsionnoi struktury u mlekopitayushchikh” (All-Union Meeting “Communicative Regulatory Mechanisms of Population Structure of Mammalians”), Moscow: Inst. Evol. Morfol. Ekol. Zhivotn., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1988, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
  20. Lisitsyna, T.Yu., Ecological adaptations and biological signaling fields of pinnipeds (Pinnipedia) in different habitats, in Aktual’nye problemy ekologii i prirodopol’zovaniya (Relevant Problems of Ecology and Nature Management), Khutorskoi, M.D., Ed., Moscow: Ross. Univ. Druzhby Narodov, 2002, no. 3, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
  21. Margalef, R., Our Biosphere, Oldendorf, Luhe: Publ. Ecol. Ins., 1997.Google Scholar
  22. Matyushkin, E.N., Choice of the route and territory expansion of Amur tiger using the data of winter routs, in Voprosy teriologii. Povedenie mlekopitayushchikh (Questions of Theriology. Behavior of Mammals), Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp. 146–178.Google Scholar
  23. Mashkin, V.I. and Baturin, A.L., Surok Menzbira (The Menzbier’s Marmot), Kirov: Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Okhotoved. Zverovod., 1993.Google Scholar
  24. Mikheev, A.V., Systematization of life activity traces as the study method of information-communicative links in communities of mammals, Ekol. Noosfer., 2003, vol. 13, nos. 1–2, pp. 93–98.Google Scholar
  25. Mikheev, A.V., Time characteristic of the life activity traces of mammals in steppe forests of Ukraine, Visn. Denetsk. Nats. Univ., Ser. A: Prirod. Nauki, 2008, no. 2, pp. 374–381.Google Scholar
  26. Mikheev, A.V., Classification of life activity traces of mammals as the signal elements of information fields, in Problemi ekologii ta okhoroni prirodi tekhnogennogo regionu (Environmental Problems of Nature Protection in Technogeneous Regions), Donetsk: Donetsk. Nats. Univ., 2009, no. 1, pp. 115–123.Google Scholar
  27. Morellet, N., Gaillard, J.-M., Mark Hewison, A.J., Ballon, P., Boscardin, Y., Duncan, P., Klein, F., and Maillard, D., Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing population of large herbivores, J. Appl. Ecol., 2007, vol. 44, pp. 634–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mozgovoi, D.P., Rozenberg, G.S., and Vladimirova, E.D., Informatsionnye polya i povedenie mlekopitayushchikh (Information Fields and Behavior of Mammals), Samara: Samar. Univ., 1998.Google Scholar
  29. Naumov, N.P., Structural levels of living matter and population biology, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1971, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 651–666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Naumov, N.P., Signaling (biological) fields and their significance for animals, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1973a, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 808–817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Naumov, N.P., Theoretical concepts and principles of ecology, in Pyataya Vsesouz. ekol. konf. “Sovremennye problemy ekologii,” doklady (Fifth All-Union Ecological Conference “Current Environmental Problems”, the Reports), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1973b, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  32. Naumov, N.P., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya. Problemy i zadachi (Population Ecology: Problems and Objectives), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1973c, pp. 76–87.Google Scholar
  33. Naumov, N.P., Bionics and superorganism systems, in Problemy bioniki (The Problems of Bionics), Moscow: Nauka, 1973d, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
  34. Naumov, N.P., Biological (signaling) fields and their significance in life of mammals, in Uspekhi sovremennoi teriologii (Advanced Theriology), Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp. 93–110.Google Scholar
  35. Naumov, N.P., Gol’tsman, M.E., Kruchenkova, E.P., Ovsyanikov, N.G., Popov, S.V., and Smirin, V.M., Social behavior of polar fox on Mednyi Island and the key factors of time-spatial activity, in Ekologiya, struktura populyatsii i vnutrividovye kommunikativnye protsessy mlekopitayushchikh (Ecology, Population Structure and Intraspecific Communications between Mammals), Moscow: Nauka, 1981, pp. 31–75.Google Scholar
  36. Naumov, N.P., Lobachev, V.S., Dmitriev, P.P., and Smirin, V.M., Prirodnyi ochag chumy v Priaral’skikh Karakumakh (Natural Plague Spot in the Pre-Aral Kara Kum), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1972.Google Scholar
  37. Nazarenko, L.F. and Gurskii, I.G., Local populations and their migration, in Izuchenie resursov nazemnykh pozvonochnykh fauny Ukrainy (Study of the Reserves of the Land Vertebrates in Ukrainian Fauna), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1969, pp. 81–83.Google Scholar
  38. Nikol’skii, A.A., Ekologicheskaya bioakustika mlekopitayushchikh (Ecological Bioacoustics of Mammals), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1992.Google Scholar
  39. Nikol’skii, A.A., Biological signaling field of mammals in climatic communities, in Chetvertyi s”ezd Teriol. O-va, Tezisy dokladov, Moskva, 13–16 aprelya (Fourth Congr. Theriological Society, Abstracts of Papers, Moscow, April 13–16), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Ekol. Evol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1999, p. 178.Google Scholar
  40. Nikol’skii, A.A., Ecological aspects of biological signaling field of mammals, Zool. Zh., 2003, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 443–449.Google Scholar
  41. Nikol’skii, A.A., The hibernation temperature niche of the steppe marmot Marmota bobak Müller 1776, Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 2009, vol. 21, nos. 3–4, pp. 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nikol’skii, A.A., Biological signaling field of mammals as the second order attractor in biogeocenosis, in IX S”ezd Teriol. O-va “Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii” (IX Congr. Theriological Society “Theriofauna of Russian and Adjacent Territories”), Moscow: KMK, 2011, pp. 332.Google Scholar
  43. Nikol’skii, A.A. and Frommol’t, K.-Kh., Zvukovaya aktivnost’ volka (Acoustic Activity of a Wolf), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1989.Google Scholar
  44. Nikol’skii, A.A. and Mukhamediev, T.D., Territoriality in the Altai Pika (Ochotona alpina), Gibier Faune Sauvage, 1997, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 359–383.Google Scholar
  45. Nikol’skii, A.A., Novikova, O.B., and Naumov, N.P., Timespatial characteristic of biological signaling field of the roar of Bukhara deer (Cervus elaphus bactrianus Lydekker), Ekologiya, 1975, no. 1, pp. 100–102.Google Scholar
  46. Nikol’skii, A.A. and Poyarkov, A.D., Group roar of jackals, in Ekologiya, struktura populyatsii i vnutrividovye kommunikativnye protsessy mlekopitayushchikh (Ecology, Population Structure, and Intraspecific Communications between Mammals), Naumov, N.P., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1981, pp. 76–98.Google Scholar
  47. Nikol’skii, A.A. and Savchenko, G.A., Structure of family groups and space use by steppe marmots (Marmota bobac): preliminary results, Vestn. Zool., 1999, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
  48. Nikol’skii, A.A., Teryokhin, A.T., Srebrodol’skaya, Ye.B., Formozov, N.A., Paskhina, N.M., and Brodsky, L.I., Correlation between the spatial structure of population and acoustic activity of Northern Pika, Ochotona hyperborea Pallas, 1811 (Mammalia), Zool. Anz., 1990, vol. 224, nos. 5/6, pp. 342–358.Google Scholar
  49. Odum, E.P., Basic Ecology, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1983.Google Scholar
  50. Ovsyanikov, N.G., Povedenie i sotsial’naya organizatsiya pestsa (Behavior and Social Organization of the Polar Fox), Moscow: Nauchno-Issled. Lab. Glavokhoty, 1993.Google Scholar
  51. Pereladova, O.B., Time-spatial dynamics of roar of Red and Bukhara deers, in Ekologiya, struktura populyatsii i vnutrividovye kommunikativnye protsessy mlekopitayushchikh (Ecology, Population Structure, and Intraspecific Communications between Mammals), Moscow: Nauka, 1981, pp. 182–244.Google Scholar
  52. Pereladova, O.B. and Nikol’skii, A.A., Time-spatial projection of life activity traces of Bukhara deer (Cervus elaphus bactrianus Lyd.), Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 16: Biol., 1978, no. 2, pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
  53. Pikunov, D.G. and Korkishko, V.G., Leopard Dal’nego Vostoka (The Far East Leopard), Moscow: Nauka, 1992.Google Scholar
  54. Poyarkov, A.D., Biological signaling field as the metatheory of communicative processes, in Mater. nauchn. konf. “Povedenie i povedencheskaya ekologiya mlekopitayushchikh” (Proc. Sci. Conf. “Behavior and Behavioral Ecology of Mammals”), Moscow: KMK, 2005, pp. 201–203.Google Scholar
  55. Poyarkov, A.D., Kuksin, A.N., Karnaukhov, A.S., Korablev, M.P., Aleksandrov, D.Yu., Chistopolova, M.D., Ernandes-Blanco, H.-A., and Rozhnov, V.V., Marking activity of snow leopard on the Tsagan-Shybetu Ridge in Southwestern Tyva, in IX S”ezd Teriol. O-va “Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii” (IX Congr. Theriological Society “Theriofauna of Russian and Adjacent Territories”), Moscow: KMK, 2011, p. 382.Google Scholar
  56. Puchkovskii, S.V., Study of biological signaling fields of brown bear (Ursus arctos L.), in Vsesoyuz. soveshch. “Kommunikativnye mekhanizmy regulirovaniya populyatsionnoi struktury u mlekopitayushchikh” (All-Union Meeting “Communicative Regulatory Mechanisms of Population Structure of Mammals”), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Ekol. Evol., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1988, pp. 142–144.Google Scholar
  57. Rozhnov, V.V., Marking behavior of mammals, Itogi Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Zool. Pozvonochnykh, 1988, vol. 15, pp. 152–211.Google Scholar
  58. Rozhnov, V.V., Oposredovannaya khemokommunikatsiya v sotsial’nom povedenii mlekopitayushchikh (Importance of Indirect Chemocommunication for Social Behavior of Mammals), Moscow: KMK, 2011.Google Scholar
  59. Savchenko, G.A., Use of territory by steppe marmot (Marmota bobak Mull.) of the northeastern Ukraine, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2002.Google Scholar
  60. Sidorchuk, N.V. and Rozhnov, V.V., Evropeiskii barsuk v Darvinskom zapovednike. Traditsionnye metody v izuchenii ekologii i povedeniya nornykh khishchnikov (European Badger in Darvinovskii Reserve: Traditional and New Study Methods of Ecology and Behavior of Burrow Raptorial Animals), Moscow: KMK, 2010.Google Scholar
  61. Sokolov, V.E., Chemical communication of mammals, in Voprosy teriologii. Uspekhi sovremennoi teriologii (Questions of Theriology. Advanced Theriology), Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp. 229–255.Google Scholar
  62. Trepet, S.A., Specific settlement of bison (Bison bonasus montanus) in Northwestern Caucasus, Zool. Zh., 2008, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1518–1523.Google Scholar
  63. Vanisova, E.A., Poyarkov, A.D., and Nikol’skii, A.A., Attractors of biological signaling field of wolves (Canis lupus) in experimental conditions, Vestn. Univ. Druzhby Nar., Ser.: Ekol. Bezop. Zhiznedeyat., 2012, no. 2, pp. 5–12.Google Scholar
  64. Vladimirova, E.D. and Mozgovoi, D.P., Influence of life activity traces of fox on winter ecology of some mustelids, Vestn. Samar. Gos. Univ., Estestvennonauchn. Ser., 2006, nos. 6/1 (46), pp. 220–234.Google Scholar
  65. Zaitsev, V.A., Kabarga Sikhote-Alinya: Ekologiya i povedenie (Ecology and Behavior of Musk Deer of the Sikhote-Alin), Moscow: Nauka, 1991.Google Scholar
  66. Zav’yalov, N.A., Peculiarities of marking behavior and dendroactivity of beavers (Castor fiber L.) in Red’ya River, Novgorod oblast, in Tr. Gos. Prorod. Zapoved. Rdeiskii (Trans. State Nature Rdeiskii Reserve), Velikii Novgorod, 2009, no. 1, pp. 187–201.Google Scholar
  67. Zheltukhin, A.S. and Zheltukhin, S.A., Constant crawlway crossings of lynxes and dynamics of their long-term use within the general net of routs, in Mater. 2-i nauch. konf. “Povedenie i povedencheskaya ekologiya mlekopitayushchikh,” g. Chernogolovka, 9–12 noyabrya 2009 g. (Proc. 2nd Sci. Conf. “Behavior and Behavioral Ecology of Mammals,” Chernogolovka, November 9–12, 2009), Moscow: KMK, 2009, p. 23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologyPeoples’ Friendship University of RussiaMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations