Abstract
A system of indices that estimate different statistical patterns of communities’ taxonomic structure organization such as nestedness, turnover, and coherence in species cooccurrence is considered. On the basis of data of hydrobiological monitoring, the statistical significance of the structural determinancy of ecosystems is analyzed by means of randomization procedures and standard null models. The comparable efficiency of different indices and methods of their estimation are discussed by the example of the macrozoobenthos communities in small rivers of the Lower Volga basin. The reason for the insufficient adequacy of methods applied for watercourses with a strongly pronounced longitudinal gradient of landscape features is analyzed. The dependence of statistical conclusions on detailing of the initial data and level and scale of aggregation of separate blocks of the ecosystem is shown.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida-Neto, M., Guimarǎes, P., Guimarǎes, J.P., et al., A Consistent Metric for Nestedness Analysis in Ecological Systems: Reconciling Concept and Quantification, Oikos, 2008, vol. 117, pp. 1227–1239.
Atmar, W. and Patterson, B.D., The Measure of Order and Disorder in the Distribution of Species in Fragmented Habitat, Oecologia, 1993, vol. 96, pp. 373–382.
Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D., The Control of False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency, Annals Statistics, 2001, vol. 29, pp. 1165–1188.
Brualdi, R.A. and Sanderson, J.G., Nested Species Subsets, Gaps, and Discrepancy, Oecologia, 1999, vol. 119, pp. 256–264.
Connor, E.F. and Simberloff, D., The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition?, Ecology, 1979, vol. 60, pp. 1132–1140.
Diamond, J.M., Assembly of Species Communities, in Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Cody, M.L. and Diamond, J.M., Eds., Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1975, pp. 342–444.
Efron, B., Bayesians, Frequentists, and Scientists, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2005, vol. 100, pp. 1–5.
Fisher, S.G., Barnes, J.R., and Minshall, G.W., Succession in Streams, in Stream Ecology: Application and Testing of General Ecological Theory, New York: Plenum Press, 1983.
Gotelli, N. and Ulrich, W., The Empirical Bayes Approach as a Tool to Identify Non-Random Species Associations, Oecologia, 2010, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 463–477.
Gotelli, N.J., Null Model Analysis of Species Co-Occurrence Patterns, Ecology, 2000, vol. 81, pp. 2606–2621.
Hausdorf, B. and Hennig, C., Null Model Tests of Clustering of Species, Negative Co-Occurrence Patterns and Nestedness in Meta-Communities, Oikos, 2007, vol. 116, pp. 818–828.
Leibold, M.A. and Mikkelson, G.M., Coherence, Species Turnover, and Boundary Clumping: Elements of Metacommunity Structure, Oikos, 2002, vol. 97, pp. 237–250.
Manly, B.F., Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, London: Chapman Hall, 2006.
Patterson, B.D. and Atmar, W., Analyzing Species Composition in Fragments, Bonner Zoologische Monographen, 2000, vol. 46, pp. 9–24.
Patterson, B.D. and Atmar, W., Nested Subsets and the Structure of Insular Mammalian Faunas and Archipelagos, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 1986, vol. 28, pp. 65–82.
Pielou, D.P. and Pielou, E.C., Association among Species of Infrequent Occurrence: The Insect and Spider Fauna of Polyporus betulinus (Bulliard) Fries, J. Theor. Biol., 1968, vol. 21, pp. 202–216.
Sanderson, J.G., Null Model Analysis of Communities on Gradients, J. Biogeogr., 2004, vol. 31, pp. 879–883.
Schluter, D., A Variance Test for Detecting Species Associations, with Some Example Applications, Ecology, 1984, vol. 65, pp. 998–1005.
Stone, L. and Roberts, A., Competitive Exclusion or Species Aggregation? An Aid in Deciding, Oecologia, 1992, vol. 91, pp. 419–424.
Stone, L. and Roberts, A., The Checkerboard Score and Species Distributions, Oecologia, 1990, vol. 85, pp. 74–79.
Townsend, C.R., The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology, J. North Amer. Benthological Society, 1989, vol. 8, pp. 36–50.
Ulrich, W. and Gotelli, N.J., Null Model Analysis of Species Nestedness Patterns, Ecology, 2007, vol. 88, pp. 1824–1831.
Ulrich, W., Almeida-Neto, M., and Gotelli, N.C., A Comsumer’s Guide to Nestedness Analysis, Oikos, 2009, vol. 118, pp. 3–17.
Vannote, R.L., Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K.W., et al., The River Continuum Concept, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1980, vol. 37, pp. 130–137.
Weiher, E. and Keddy, P.A. (Eds.), Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats, Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1999.
Zinchenko, T.D. and Golovatyuk, L.V., Changes in the State of Benthos in Small Rivers of the Middle Volga Basin. 1. The Composition and Distribution of Benthic Fauna in the Sok River Tributaries (Kamyshla, Sosnovka, Chernovka, and Khoroshen’kaya), Izv. Samar. NTs RAN, 2000, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 257–267.
Zinchenko, T.D., Chironomidae of the Surface Waters of the Basin of Central and Lower Volga (Samara oblast), in Ekologo-faunisticheskii obzor (Ecological-Faunistic Review), Samara: IEVB RAN, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.K. Shitikov, T.D. Zinchenko, 2011, published in Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 2011, Vol. 72, No. 5, pp. 355–368.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shitikov, V.K., Zinchenko, T.D. Statistical methods for analysis of the species structure of communities (by the example of the riverine macrozoobenthos). Biol Bull Rev 2, 25–35 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086412010069
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086412010069