Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cytogenetic approaches for determining ecological stress in aquatic and terrestrial biosystems

Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research volume 5, pages 441–448 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Genetic monitoring of the environment is an important component in the analysis of the status of the biosystems. Its efficiency depends on the correct choice of (a) natural bioindicator species; (b) appropriate signs reflecting the state of the environment; and (c) appropriate statistical analysis. The assessment of genomes’ integrity plays the key role in the studies of mutagenicity in a polluted environment. We present a step-by-step recommendations for the analysis of the cytogenetic data and discuss the prospects of applying genetic tests for ecological monitoring, based on the example of analysis using crustacean species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Ashmarin, I.P., Vasil’ev, N.N., and Ambrosov, V.A., Bystrye metody statisticheskoi obrabotki i planirovanie eksperimentov (Rapid Methods of Statistical Processing and Design of Experiments), Leningrad: Izd. LGU, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabanova, L.V. and Colgan, N.S., Evaluation of the genetic consequences of anthropogenic pollution of the Gulf of Finland and St. Petersburg, in Materialy regional’noi molodezhnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Ekologicheskaya shkola v g. pPetergofe naukograde Rossiiskoi Federatsii: problemy natsional’nogo sektora Baltiiskogo regiona i puti ikh “resheniya” (Proceedings of the Regional Youth Conference “Environmental School in Peterhof—Naukograd of the Russian Federation: Problems of the National Sector of the Baltic Region and Ways to Solve Them”), St. Petersburg: The Golden Section, 2007, pp. 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabanova, L.V., Dukelskaya, A.V., and Daev, E.V., The use of cytogenetic methods in bioindication of the state of water bodies of the Northwest, in Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Bioindikatsiya v monitoringe presnovodnykh ekosistem” (State of the Genetic Apparatus of Crustaceans as an Indicator of Water Pollution at Early Diagnostics of Anthropogenic Load. Proceedings of the International Conference “Bioindication in Monitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems”), St. Petersburg: LEMA, 2007, pp. 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabanova, L.V., Daev, E.V., and Dukel’skaja, A.V., State of the genetic apparatus of crustaceans as an indicator of water pollution at early diagnostics of anthropogenic load, in Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Bioindikatsiya v monitoringe presnovodnykh ekosistem II” (State of the Genetic Apparatus of Crustaceans as an Indicator of Water Pollution at Early Diagnostics of Anthropogenic Load. Proceedings of the International Conference “Bioindication in Monitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems II”), St. Petersburg: Lyubavich, 2011, pp. 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baršiene, J., Schiedek, D., and Lehtonen, K., in: Development of a Set of Core Indicators: Interim Report of the HELCOM CORESET Project. PART B: Descriptions of the Indicators, Korpinen, S. and Zweifel, U.L., Eds., Helsinki: Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, 2012, no. 129B, pp. 138–145.

  • Biologicheskii kontrol’ okruzhajushhei sredy: geneticheskii monitoring (Biological Control of Environment: Genetic Monitoring), Geras’ kin, S.A. and Sarapult seva, E.I., Eds., Moscow: Izd. Tsentr Academiya, 2010.

  • Bochkov, N.P., Chebotarev, A.N., Katosova, L.D., and Platonova, V.I., Russ. J. Genet., 2001, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusick, D., Mutat. Res., 1998, vol. 205, nos. 1–4, pp. 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glotov, N.V., Zhivotovskij, L.A., Hovanov, N.V., and Hromov-Borisov, N.N., Biometriya (Biometrics), Leningrad: Izd. LGU, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daev, E.V., Barabanova, L.V., Bondarenko, L.V., and Simonenko, V.D., Crustaceans of the Order Isopoda as a Test Object for Assessing the Ecological State of the Aquatic Environment, Vestn. S.-Peterburg. Gos. Univ., 2002, Ser. 3, vol. 4, no. 27, pp. 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daev, E.V., Dukel’skaya, A.V., and Kazarova, V.E., Approach to assessing the mutagenicity of contaminated water by cytogenetic methods using the bioindicator species Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda), Ekol. Genet., 2009, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il’inskih, N.N., Novitskii, V.V., Vanchugova, N.N., and Il’inskih, I.N., Mikroyadernyi analiz i tstogeneticheskaya nestabil’nost' (Micronucleus Assay and Cytogenetic Instability), Tomsk: Izd. Tomsk. Univ., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S.G., Ecological genetics. What is it?, Soros. Obrazovat. Zh., 1998, no. 2, pp. 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S.G., Barabanova, L.V., Daev, E.V., and Luchnikova, E.M., Influence of ecological relations on the genetic processes, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ. Biol., 1999, ser. 3, vol. 4, pp. 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasuba, V., Rozgaj, R., and Jazbec, A., Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol., 2008, vol. 59, pp. 251–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcon, F., Andreoli, C., Rossi, S., et al., Mutat. Res., 2003, vol. 541, pp. 1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mashkina, O.S., Kalaev, V.N., Muraya, L.S., and Lelikova, E.S., Cytogenetic response of Scots pine seed progeny to the combined anthropogenic pollution in the vicinity of NLMK, Ekol. Genet., 2009, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukovodstvo po kratkosrochnym testam dlya vyyavleniya mutagennykh i kantserogennyh khimicheskikh soedinenii. Gigienicheskie kriterii okruzhayushchei sredy (Guide to Short-Term Tests for Detecting Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Chemicals. Hygienic Criteria of the Environment), Geneva: VOZ, 1982, no. 51.

  • Urbah, V.Ju., Biometricheskie metody (statisticheskaya obrabotka opytnykh dannykh v biologii, sel’skom khozyaistve i medicine) (Biometric Methods (Statistical Processing of the Experimental Data in Biology, Agriculture, and Medicine)), Moscow: Nauka, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacenko, N.E., Tolkovyi slovar’ obshchestvovedcheskih terminov. Uchebnik dlya vuzov (The Explanatory Dictionary of Social Science Terms. Textbook for High Schools), St. Petersburg: Izd. Lan, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri, F. and Hirobe, T., Eur. J. Radiol., 2010, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 191–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

    E. V. Daev, A. V. Dukelskaya & L. V. Barabanova

Authors
  1. E. V. Daev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Dukelskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. V. Barabanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Daev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.V. Daev, A.V. Dukelskaya, L.V. Barabanova, 2014, published in Ecologicheskaya Genetika, 2014, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 3–12.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daev, E.V., Dukelskaya, A.V. & Barabanova, L.V. Cytogenetic approaches for determining ecological stress in aquatic and terrestrial biosystems. Russ J Genet Appl Res 5, 441–448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059715050056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059715050056

Keywords

search

Navigation