Skip to main content
Log in

Motivational Inductors of Behavior as Reserves of Successful Aging

  • Published:
Advances in Gerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Age-related characteristics of motivational inductors of behavior and internal control, which contribute to “successful” aging, are studied. University students and elderly women (20 ± 1.1 and 65.1 ± 5.8 years, respectively) are involved in the study. The dominance of cognitive activity in the profile of motivational inductors regardless of the age and time period of self-appraisal is established. Age differences are found for the “future” situation: increased importance of physical activity for the elderly and significantly greater importance of the “emotional state” components both in the present and in the future for young female students. However, the recognition of the priority of cognitive activity does not correspond to the practical implementation of the cognitive training program, presumably due to the age-related weakening of executive control in initiating new activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Nikolaeva, E.I. and Vergunov, E.G., What are “executive functions” and their development in ontogenesis, Teor. Eksp. Psikhol., 2017, no. 2, pp. 62–81.

  2. Nuttin, J., Motivation, Planning, and Action: A Relational Theory of Behavior Dynamics, Leuven: Leuven Univ. Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Razumnikova, O.M., Patterns of brain aging and activation of its compensatory resources, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 2015, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 3–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Razumnikova, O.M., Prokhorova, L.V., and Yashanina, A.A., Age-related features of the relationship between intelligence and self-assessment of life quality, Usp. Gerontol., 2016, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 353–359.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acosta, L.M., Goodman, I.J., and Heilman, K.M., Unilateral perseveration, Cognit. Behav. Neurol., 2013, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchard-Fields, F., Flexible and adaptive socio-emotional problem solving in adult development and aging, Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 27, pp. 539–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brass, M. and Haggard, P., The what, when, whether model of intentional action, Neurosci. Rev. J. Bringing Neurobiol. Neurol. Psychiatry, 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charles, S.T., Piazza, J.R., Mogle, J.A., et al., Age differences in emotional well-being vary by temporal recall, J. Gerontol., Ser. B, 2016, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 798–807.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crockett, M.J., Clark, L., Hauser, M.D., and Robbins, T.W., Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2010, vol. 107, no. 40, pp. 17433–17438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Díaz, E., Vargas, J.P., Quintero, E., et al., Differential implication of dorsolateral and dorsomedial srtiatum in encoding and recovery processes of latent inhibition, Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 2014, vol. 111, pp. 19–25.

  11. Filevich, E., Kühn, S., and Haggard, P., Intentional inhibition in human action: the power of ‘no’, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2012, vol. 36, pp. 1107–1118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Forstmann, B.U., Keuken, M.C., Jahfari, S., et al., Corticosubthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response, NeuroImage, 2012, vol. 60, pp. 370–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. King, A.V., Linke, J., Gass, A., et al., Microstructure of a three-way anatomical network predicts individual differences in response inhibition: a tractography study, NeuroImage, 2012, vol. 59, pp. 1949–1959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kühn, S., Haggard, P., and Brass, M., Intentional inhibition: how the veto-area exerts control, Hum. Brain Map., 2009, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2834–2843.

  15. Laureiro-Martinez, D., Trujillo, C.A., and Unda, J., Time perspective and age: a review of age associated differences, Front. Psychol., 2017, vol. 8, art. ID 101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., and O’Hearn, K., What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence?, Brain Cognit., 2010, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Passingham, R.E., Bengtsson, S.L., and Lau, H.C., Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one’s own performance, Trends Cognit. Sci., 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Razumnikova, O., Savinykh, M., Suslov, R., and Petrov, R., A computerized cognitive test battery. Individual differences in cognitive characteristics: measuring and dynamic of training, Proc. 11th Int. Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), Novosibirsk, 2016, pp. 256–258.

  19. Ripke, S., Hübner, T., Mennigen, E., et al., Reward processing and intertemporal decision making in adults and adolescents: the role of impulsivity and decision consistency, Brain Res., 2012, vol. 1478, pp. 36–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schel, M.A., Ridderinkhof, K.R., and Crone, E.A., Choosing not to act: neural bases of the development of intentional inhibition, Dev. Cognit. Neurosci., 2014, vol. 10, pp. 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheres, A., De Water, E., and Mies, G.W., The neural correlates of temporal reward discounting, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Cognit. Sci., 2013, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shoraka, A.R., Otzel, D.M., Zilli, E.M., et al., Effects of aging on action-intentional programming, Aging, Neuropsychol., Cognit., 2018, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 244–258.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Turner, G.R. and Spreng, R.N., Executive functions and neurocognitive aging: dissociable patterns of brain activity, Neurobiol. Aging, 2012, vol. 33, pp. 826.e1–826.e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 17-06-00166, “Organization of inhibitory control in ontogeny: implications for learning and adaptations”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. M. Razumnikova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.

Additional information

Translated by G. Levit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razumnikova, O.M., Asanova, N.V. Motivational Inductors of Behavior as Reserves of Successful Aging. Adv Gerontol 9, 361–365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057019030135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057019030135

Keywords:

Navigation