Abstract
Age-related characteristics of motivational inductors of behavior and internal control, which contribute to “successful” aging, are studied. University students and elderly women (20 ± 1.1 and 65.1 ± 5.8 years, respectively) are involved in the study. The dominance of cognitive activity in the profile of motivational inductors regardless of the age and time period of self-appraisal is established. Age differences are found for the “future” situation: increased importance of physical activity for the elderly and significantly greater importance of the “emotional state” components both in the present and in the future for young female students. However, the recognition of the priority of cognitive activity does not correspond to the practical implementation of the cognitive training program, presumably due to the age-related weakening of executive control in initiating new activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Nikolaeva, E.I. and Vergunov, E.G., What are “executive functions” and their development in ontogenesis, Teor. Eksp. Psikhol., 2017, no. 2, pp. 62–81.
Nuttin, J., Motivation, Planning, and Action: A Relational Theory of Behavior Dynamics, Leuven: Leuven Univ. Press, 1984.
Razumnikova, O.M., Patterns of brain aging and activation of its compensatory resources, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 2015, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 3–16.
Razumnikova, O.M., Prokhorova, L.V., and Yashanina, A.A., Age-related features of the relationship between intelligence and self-assessment of life quality, Usp. Gerontol., 2016, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 353–359.
Acosta, L.M., Goodman, I.J., and Heilman, K.M., Unilateral perseveration, Cognit. Behav. Neurol., 2013, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 181–188.
Blanchard-Fields, F., Flexible and adaptive socio-emotional problem solving in adult development and aging, Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 27, pp. 539–550.
Brass, M. and Haggard, P., The what, when, whether model of intentional action, Neurosci. Rev. J. Bringing Neurobiol. Neurol. Psychiatry, 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 319–325.
Charles, S.T., Piazza, J.R., Mogle, J.A., et al., Age differences in emotional well-being vary by temporal recall, J. Gerontol., Ser. B, 2016, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 798–807.
Crockett, M.J., Clark, L., Hauser, M.D., and Robbins, T.W., Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2010, vol. 107, no. 40, pp. 17433–17438.
Díaz, E., Vargas, J.P., Quintero, E., et al., Differential implication of dorsolateral and dorsomedial srtiatum in encoding and recovery processes of latent inhibition, Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 2014, vol. 111, pp. 19–25.
Filevich, E., Kühn, S., and Haggard, P., Intentional inhibition in human action: the power of ‘no’, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2012, vol. 36, pp. 1107–1118.
Forstmann, B.U., Keuken, M.C., Jahfari, S., et al., Corticosubthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response, NeuroImage, 2012, vol. 60, pp. 370–375.
King, A.V., Linke, J., Gass, A., et al., Microstructure of a three-way anatomical network predicts individual differences in response inhibition: a tractography study, NeuroImage, 2012, vol. 59, pp. 1949–1959.
Kühn, S., Haggard, P., and Brass, M., Intentional inhibition: how the veto-area exerts control, Hum. Brain Map., 2009, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2834–2843.
Laureiro-Martinez, D., Trujillo, C.A., and Unda, J., Time perspective and age: a review of age associated differences, Front. Psychol., 2017, vol. 8, art. ID 101.
Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., and O’Hearn, K., What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence?, Brain Cognit., 2010, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 101–113.
Passingham, R.E., Bengtsson, S.L., and Lau, H.C., Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one’s own performance, Trends Cognit. Sci., 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16–21.
Razumnikova, O., Savinykh, M., Suslov, R., and Petrov, R., A computerized cognitive test battery. Individual differences in cognitive characteristics: measuring and dynamic of training, Proc. 11th Int. Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), Novosibirsk, 2016, pp. 256–258.
Ripke, S., Hübner, T., Mennigen, E., et al., Reward processing and intertemporal decision making in adults and adolescents: the role of impulsivity and decision consistency, Brain Res., 2012, vol. 1478, pp. 36–47.
Schel, M.A., Ridderinkhof, K.R., and Crone, E.A., Choosing not to act: neural bases of the development of intentional inhibition, Dev. Cognit. Neurosci., 2014, vol. 10, pp. 93–103.
Scheres, A., De Water, E., and Mies, G.W., The neural correlates of temporal reward discounting, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Cognit. Sci., 2013, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 523–545.
Shoraka, A.R., Otzel, D.M., Zilli, E.M., et al., Effects of aging on action-intentional programming, Aging, Neuropsychol., Cognit., 2018, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 244–258.
Turner, G.R. and Spreng, R.N., Executive functions and neurocognitive aging: dissociable patterns of brain activity, Neurobiol. Aging, 2012, vol. 33, pp. 826.e1–826.e13
Funding
The work was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 17-06-00166, “Organization of inhibitory control in ontogeny: implications for learning and adaptations”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.
Additional information
Translated by G. Levit
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Razumnikova, O.M., Asanova, N.V. Motivational Inductors of Behavior as Reserves of Successful Aging. Adv Gerontol 9, 361–365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057019030135
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057019030135