Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 63–74 | Cite as

Ophiostomatoid Fungi Associated with the Four-Eyed Fir Bark Beetle on the Territory of Russia

  • N. V. Pashenova
  • A. V. Kononov
  • K. V. Ustyantsev
  • A. G. Blinov
  • A. A. Pertsovaya
  • Yu. N. Baranchikov


The study is aimed at investigation of ophiostomatoid fungi, associated with the four-eyed fir bark beetle (Polygraphus proximus Blandford, Coleoptera, Curculionidae)—an invasive pest of Siberian fir Abies sibirica. In the Russian Far East, eight fungal species are associated with this bark beetle. All of these fungi (except Leptographium taigense and Grosmannia europhioides) were brought by P. proximus to its secondary range (Southern Siberia and Moscow oblast). In the secondary range, a complex of ophiostomatoid fungi connected with P. proximus consists mainly of the Far Eastern species adapted to new habitats. Phytopathogenic activity of the fungi associated with bark beetle was studied. G. aoshimae and Ophiostoma nikkoense demonstrated high phytopathogenic activity after inoculation into phloem of Siberian fir. The culture of G. aoshimae and O. subalpinum produced extensive necroses in stems of Siberian larch Larix sibirica. In general, G. aoshimae is the main fungal associate of P. proximus, considering the frequency and stability of its occurrence in samples, as well as its aggressiveness toward coniferous species of Southern Siberia. It demonstrated high aggressiveness toward Siberian fir and Siberian larch; Scots pine Pinus sylvestris is also susceptible to this fungus. Siberian spruce Picea obovata and Siberian pine Pinus sibirica are resistant. There is a high possibility of P. proximus mycobiota enrichment with a complex of fungi connected with fir sawyer beetle Monochamus urussovi Fisch., an aboriginal pest of fir in Siberia.


ophiostomatoid fungi invasion Polygraphus proximus conifers Southern Siberia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baranchikov, Yu.N., Invasions of dendrophilic insects—a source of economic problems and a testing ground for ecological and evolutionary research, Mater. Vseros. konf. “Ekologicheskie i ekonomicheskie posledstviya invazii dendrofil’nykh nasekomykh” (Proc. All-Russia Conf. “Ecological and Economic Consequences of Dendrophilous Insects Invasions”), Baranchikov, Yu.N., Ed., Krasnoyarsk: Inst. Lesa, Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2012, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  2. Baranchikov, Yu.N., Pet’ko, V.M., Astapenko, S.A., Akulov, E.N., and Krivets, S.A., Four-eyed fir bark beetle— a new aggressive pest of fir in Siberia, Lesn. Vestn., 2011, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 78–81.Google Scholar
  3. Center for Collective Use “Genomics,” Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 2017. Assessed January 20, 2017.Google Scholar
  4. Chilakhsaeva, E.A., The first record of Polygraphus proximus Blandford, 1894 (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) from Moscow province, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 2008, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
  5. De Beer, Z.W., Seifert, K.A., and Wingfield, M.J., A nomenclator for ophiostomatoid genera and species in the Ophiostomatales and Microascales, in The Ophiostomatoid Fungi: Expanding Frontiers. CBS Biodiversity, Ser. 12, Seifert, K.A., de Beer, Z.W., and Wingfield, M.J., Eds., Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, 2013, pp. 245–322.Google Scholar
  6. Desprez-Loustau, M.-L., Robin, C., Buee, M., Courtecuisse, R., Garbaye, J., Suffert, F., Sache, I., and Rizzo, D.M., The fungal dimension of biological invasions, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2007, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 472–480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Edgar, R.C., MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput, Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1792–1797.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbs, J.N., The biology of Ophiostomatoid fungi causing sapstain in trees and freshly cut logs, in Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma, Taxonomy, Ecology and Pathogenicity, Wingfield, M.J., Seifert, K.A., and Webber, J.F., Eds., St. Paul: APS, 1999, pp. 153–160.Google Scholar
  9. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., and Gascuel, O., New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0, Syst. Biol., 2010, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 307–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs, K.M., Wingfield, M.J., Pashenova, N.V., and Vetrova, V.P., A new Leptographium species from Russia, Mycol. Res., 2000, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 1524–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerchev, I.A., Experimental study of the possibility of the emergence of new trophic connections of four-eyed fir bark beetle Polygraphus proximus Blandf. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the West-Siberian region, Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Biol., 2012, no. 3 (19), pp. 169–177.Google Scholar
  12. Kerchev, I.A., Ecology of four-eyed fir bark beetle Polygraphus proximus Blandford (Coleoptera; Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the West-Siberian region of invasion, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2014, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolarík, M. and Kirkendall, L.R., Evidence for a new lineage of primary ambrosia fungi in Geosmithia Pitt (Ascomycota: Hypocreales), Fungal Biol., 2010, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 676–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolarík, M., Kubátová, A., Hulcr, J., and Pazoutová, S., Geosmithia fungi are highly diverse and consistent bark beetle associates: evidence from their community structure in temperate Europe, Microb. Ecol., 2008, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 65–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kononov, A., Ustyantsev, K., Blinov, A., Fet, V., and Baranchikov, Y.N., Genetic diversity of aboriginal and invasive populations of four-eyed fir bark beetle Polygraphus proximus Blandford (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae), Agric. For. Entomol., 2016, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krivets, S.A., Kerchev, I.A., Bisirova, E.M., Pashenova, N.V., Demidko, D.A., Pet’ko, V.M., and Baranchikov, Yu.N., Ussuriiskii poligraf v lesakh Sibiri (Four-Eyed Fir Bark Beetle in Siberian Forests), Tomsk: UMIUM, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Linnakoski, R., de Beer, Z.W., Niemelä, P., and Wingfield, M.J., Associations of conifer-infesting bark beetles and fungi in Fennoscandia, Insects, 2012, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 200–227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mandel’shtam, M.Yu. and Popovichev, B.G., An annotated list of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Leningrad province, Entomol. Rev., 2000, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 887–903.Google Scholar
  19. Masuya, H., Yamaoka, Y., and Wingfield, M.J., Ophiostomatoid fungi and their associations with bark beetles in Japan, in The Ophiostomatoid Fungi: Expanding Frontiers, CBS Biodiversity, Ser. 12, Seifert, K.A., de Beer, Z.W., and Wingfield, M.J., Eds., Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, 2013, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
  20. Ohtaka, N., Masuya, H., Kaneko, S., and Yamaoka, Y., Two Ophiostoma species associated with bark beetles in wave-regenerated Abies veitchii forests in Japan, Mycosciense, 2002, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohtaka, N., Masuya, H., Yamaoka, Y., and Kaneko, S., Two new Ophiostoma species lacking conidial states isolated from bark beetles and bark beetle-infested Abies species in Japan, Can. J. Bot., 2006, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 282–293. Scholar
  22. Pashenova, N.V. and Baranchikov, Yu.N., Identification of Grosmannia aoshimae—a specific fungal associate of the four-eyed fir bark beetle, Lesnoi Vestn., 2013, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 106–111.Google Scholar
  23. Pashenova, N.V., Vydryakova, G.A., and Vetrova, V.P., Phytopathogenic micromycetes associated with Monochamus urussovi, Lesovedenie, 1994, no. 3, pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
  24. Pashenova, N.V., Vishnyakova, Z.V., and Vetrova, V.P., Structural changes of bark and wood mycobiota in conifers after damage by Siberian moth and xylophagous pests, Lesovedenie, 1998, no. 4, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
  25. Pashenova, N.V., Polyakova, G.G., and Afanasova, E.N., Studying blue stain fungi in Central Siberia coniferous forests, Khvoinye Boreal. Zony, 2009, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
  26. Runion, R.P., Spravochnik po neparametricheskoi statistike: sovremennyi podkhod (Handbook on Nonparametric Statistics: A Modern Approach), Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 1982.Google Scholar
  27. Schoch, C.L., Seifert, K.A., Huhndorf, S., Robert, V., Spouge, J.L., Levesque, C.A., and Chen, W., Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as an universal DNA barcode marker for fungi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012, vol. 109, no. 16, pp. 6241–6246.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Seraya, L.G., Pashenova, N.V., Mukhina, L.N., Dymovich, A.V., Aleksandrova, M.S., and Baranchikov, Yu.N., Defectiveness the species Abies Mill. by four-eyed fir bark beetle Polygraphus proximus Bland. and his fungus associations in the collection of the Central Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences, Mater. Vseross. konf. “Lesnye biogeotsenozy boreal’noi zony: geografiya, struktura, funktsii, dinamika” (Proc. All-Russia Conf. “Forest Biogeocenoses of the Boreal Zone: Geography, Structure, Functions, Dynamics”), Baranchikov, Yu.N., et al., Eds., Novosibirsk: Izd. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014, pp. 652–655.Google Scholar
  29. Six, D.L. and Wingfield, M.J., The role of phytopathogenicity in bark beetle–fungus symbiosis: a challenge to the classic paradigm, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2010, vol. 56, pp. 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solhiem, H., Pathogenicity of some Ips typographus-associated blue-stain fungi to Norway spruce, Medd. Norsk Inst. Skogfor., 1988, no. 14, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  31. Stark, V.N., Fauna SSSR, Tom 31: Zhestkokrylye, Koroedy (Fauna of the USSR, Vol. 31: Coleoptera, Bark Beetles), Moscow: Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1952.Google Scholar
  32. Tokuda, M., Shoubu, M., Yamaguchi, D., and Yukawa, J., Defoliation and dieback of Abies firma (Pinaceae) trees caused by Parendaeus abietinus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Polygraphus proximus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Mount Unzen, Appl. Entomol. Zool., 2008, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitney, H.S., Relationships between bark beetles and symbiotic organisms, in Bark Beetles in North American Conifers, Mitton, J.B. and Sturgeon, K.B., Eds., Austin: Univ. Texas, 1982, pp. 183–211.Google Scholar
  34. Yamaoka, Y., Masuya, H., Ohtaka, N., Goto, H., Kaneko, S., and Abe, J.P., Three new Ophiostoma species with Pesotum anamorphs associated with bark beetles infesting Abies species in Nikko, Japan, Mycoscience, 2004a, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamaoka, Y., Masuya, H., Ohtaka, N., Goto, H., Kaneko, S., and Kuroda, Y., Ophiostoma species associated with bark beetles infesting three Abies species in Nikko, Japan, J. For. Res., 2004b, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin, M., Duong, T.A., Wingfield, M.J., Zhou, X.D., and de Beer, Z.W., Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Leptographium procerum complex, including Leptographium sinense sp. nov. and Leptographium longiconidiophorum sp. nov., Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2015, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 547–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. V. Pashenova
    • 1
  • A. V. Kononov
    • 2
  • K. V. Ustyantsev
    • 2
  • A. G. Blinov
    • 2
  • A. A. Pertsovaya
    • 1
  • Yu. N. Baranchikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations