Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 29–37 | Cite as

Asclepias syriaca L. in the Romensko-Poltavsky Geobotanical District (Ukraine)

Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The results of an integrated research of a potentially invasive species, Asclepias syriaca, in the Romensko-Poltavsky Geobotanical District (Ukraine) are given. The viability of the seeds of this species and their laboratory germinating ability are studied. Under natural conditions, the life strategy of the species is focused on vegetative reproduction. A. syriaca forms poor floral biocenoses and grows in the communities of the Rudbeckio laciniatae-Solidaginetum canadensis Tüxen et Raabe ex Anioł-Kwiatkowska 1974 and Asclepiadetum syriacae Láníková in Chytrý 2009 associations. This species is distributed mainly in type 1 biotopes, which are formed as a result of the constant effect of anthropogenic factors. According to the Invasive Species Assessment Protocol, the level of species invasiveness is high (I-Rank = 95), which indicates a serious threat to local species and natural communities under the influence of A. syriaca distribution.

Keywords

Asclepias syriaca kenophyte colonophyte ergasiophyte potentially invasive species Romensko- Poltavsky Geobotanical District Ukraine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbate, G., An Annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora, Conti, F., Abbate, G., Alessandrin, A., and Blasi, C., Eds., Roma: Palombi, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Bacieczko, W., Winiarska, M., and Baszutska, U., Asclepias syriaca L. from the family Asclepiadaceae—an invador in the flora of Poland, Nauk. Visn. Nats. Leso-Tekhn. Univ., Ukraine, 2013, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
  3. Bagi, I., Common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.), in The Most Important Invasive Plants in Hungary, Botta-Dukàt, Z. and Balogh, L., Eds., Vácrátót: Inst. Ecol. Bot., Acad. Sci. Hung., 2008, pp. 151–159.Google Scholar
  4. Baillon, H., Histoire des Plantes, Vol. 10: Monographie des Asclepiadacees, Convolvulacees, Polemoniacees et Boraginacees, Paris: Hachette, 1890, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 221–304.Google Scholar
  5. Baziner, F., Excellent melliferous perennial plant, Zemledel. Gazeta, 1855, no. 23, pp. 90–91.Google Scholar
  6. Braun-Blanquet, J., Pflanzensoziologie Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1928.Google Scholar
  7. Budzhak, V.V. and Dvirna, T.S., Mapping of adventitious plant species of Romensko-Poltavsky geobotanical okrug, Biol. Syst., 2014, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 78–81.Google Scholar
  8. Didukh, Ya.P., Fitsailo, T.V., Korotchenko, I.A., Yakushenko, D., and Pashkevich, N.A., Biotopy lisovoi ta lisostepovoi zon Ukraini (Biotopes of Forest and Forest-Steppe Zones of Ukraine), Kyiv: MACROS, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Dvirna, T.S., Ergasiophytes—unstable component of adventitious fraction of flora of the Romensko-Poltavsky geobotanical okrug, Mater. mizhn. nauk. konf. “Rol’ botanichnikh sadiv ta dendroparkiv u zberezhenni ta zbagachenni biologichnogo riznomanittya urbanizovanikh teritorii,” Kiïv, 28–31 travnya 2013 (Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. “Role of Botanical Gardens and Arboretums in Preserving and Enriching the Biodiversity of Urbanized Territories,” Kyiv, May 28–31, 2013), Kyiv: Megapolis Ecomonitoring and Biodiversity Research Centre, Natl. Acad. Sci. Ukraine, 2013, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
  10. Dvirna, T.S., Asclepias syriaca L.—history of cultivation and current distribution in Romensko-Poltavsky geo-botanical district (Ukraine), Mater. raboch. sovesh. “Invazionnaya biologiya: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy,” Moskva, 10–13 sentyabrya 2014 (Proc. Working Meet. “Invasive Biology: Current State and Prospects,” Moscow, September 10–13, 2014), Maiorov, S.R., Ed., Moscow: MAKS, 2014, pp. 82–88.Google Scholar
  11. Dvirna, T.S., Distribution of selected invasive plant species in the Romensko-Poltavsky geobotanical district (Ukraine), Biodivers. Res. Conserv., 2015, vol. 40, pp. 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiziko-geograficheskoe raionirovanie Ukrainskoi SSR (Physical-Geographic Zoning of Ukrainian SSR), Popov, V.P., Ed., Kyiv: Kyiv Univ., 1968.Google Scholar
  13. Geobotanichne raionuvannya Ukraïns’koï SSR (Geobotanical Zoning of the Ukrainian SSR), Barbarich, A.I., Ed., Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Gerhardt, F., Propagation and food translocation in milkweed, J. Agric. Res., 1929, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 837–851.Google Scholar
  15. Khomyuk, S.O., Features of germination of common milkweed, Karantin Zashch. Rosl., 2011, no. 5, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
  16. Kornas, J., A geographical-historical classification of synanthropic plants, Mater. Zakl. Foitosoc. Stos. U.W., 1968, no. 25, pp. 33–41.Google Scholar
  17. Kornas, J., Analysis of synanthropic flora, Wiad. Bot., 1977, no. 21, pp. 85–91.Google Scholar
  18. Kuz’menko, A., Asclepias cornuti Decaisne distribution and culture in Ukraine, Tr. Sil’s’ko-Gospodar. Bot., 1929, vol. 2, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  19. Leisle, V., Milkweed in the Central Chernozem Region, Sovet. Kauchuk, 1932, nos. 11–12.Google Scholar
  20. Makogon, V.N., Sovetskii natural’nyi kauchuk (Soviet Natural Rubber), Moscow: Gos. Uch.-Pedagog. Izd., 1932.Google Scholar
  21. Morse, L.E., Randall, J.M., Benton, N., Hiebert, R., and Lu, S., An Invasive Species Assessment Protocol, Vers. 1: Evaluating Non-Native Plants for Their Impact on Biodiversity, Arlington: NatureServe, 2004.Google Scholar
  22. Paukova, Ž., Knápeková, M., and Hauptvogl, M., Mapping the occurrence of populations of alien species Asclepias syriaca and Fallopia japonica in agricultural areas of Ukraine, J. Centr. Eur. Agr., 2014, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Protopopova, V.V., Sinantropnaya flora Ukrainy i puti ee razvitiya (The Synanthropic Flora of Ukraine and the Ways of Its Development), Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Protopopova, V.V. and Shevera, M.V., Ergasiophytes as a potential reserve in Ukrainian alien fraction flora, Mater. Mizhn. nauk. konf. “Rol’ botanichnikh sadiv ta dendroparkiv u zberezhenni ta zbagachenni biologichnogo riznomanittya urbanizovanikh teritorii,” Kiïv, 28–31 travnya, 2013 (Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. “Role of Botanical Gardens and Arboretums in Preserving and Enriching the Biodiversity of Urbanized Territories,” Kiev, May 28–31, 2013), Kyiv: Megapolis Ecomonitoring and Biodiversity Research Centre, Natl. Acad. Sci. Ukraine, 2013, pp. 138–139.Google Scholar
  25. Protopopova, V.V. and Shevera, M.V., Ergasiophytes of the Ukrainian flora, Biodiv. Res. Conserv., 2014, vol. 35, pp. 31–46.Google Scholar
  26. Pyšek, P., Danihelka, J., Sádlo, J., Chrtek, J., Jr., Chytrý, M., Jarošik, V., Kaplan, Z., Krahulec, F., Moravcová, L., Pergl, J., Štajerová, K., and Tichý, L., Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic: checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns, Preslia, 2012, vol. 84, pp. 155–255.Google Scholar
  27. Radde-Fomina, O., Technical spinning plant Asclepias cornuti and its use in Ukrainian culture, Visn. Sil’s’ko-Gospodar. Nauki, 1922, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
  28. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D., and West, C.J., Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions, Divers. Distrib., 2000, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 93–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stolbin, P.A., Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) as an object for selections, in Selektsiya kauchukonosnykh rastenii (The Selection of Rubber Plants), Kuptsov, A.I., Ed., Moscow: Sel’khozgiz, 1937, no. 1, pp. 63–851.Google Scholar
  30. Vegetace Ceské Republiky, Vol. 2: Ruderální, plevelová, skalní a sutová vegetace (Vegetation of the Czech Republic, Vol. 2: Ruderal, Weed, Rock and Scree Vegetation), Chytrý, M., Ed., Praha: Academia, 2009.Google Scholar
  31. Verloove, F., Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800–2005), Scripta Bot. Belg., 2006, vol. 39, pp. 1–89.Google Scholar
  32. Vinogradova, Yu.K. and Kuklina, A.G., Resursnyi potentsial invazionnykh vidov rastenii. Vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya chuzherodnykh vidov (Resource Potential of Invasive Plant Species. Opportunities for Using Alien Species), Moscow: GEOS, 2012.Google Scholar
  33. Wallnöfer, B., An annotated checklist of the vascular plants of the Cres-Losinj (Cherso-Lussino) archipelago (NEAdriatic Sea, Croatia), Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 2008, vol. 109B, pp. 207–318.Google Scholar
  34. Woodson, R.E., Jr., The North American species of Asclepias L., Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 1954, vol. 41, pp. 1–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zinchenko O.I., Koroteev A.V., Kalens’ka S.M., Demidas’ G.I., Petrichenko V.F., Salatenko V.N., Fedorchuk M.I., Tkachuk V., and Bilonozhko, V.Ya., Roslinnitstvo: Praktikum (laboratorno-praktichni zanyattya) (Crop Production: Practical and Laboratory Manual), Vinnitsa: Nova Kniga, 2010.Google Scholar
  36. Zlobin, Yu.A., Printsipy i metody izucheniya tsenoticheskikh populyatsii rastenii (Principles and Methods for Studying Cenotic Populations of Plants: Manual), Kazan: Kazan. Gos. Univ., 1989.Google Scholar
  37. Zlobin, Yu.A., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya rastenii: sovremennoe sostoyanie, tochki rosta (Population Ecology of Plants: Current State, in Terms of Growth), Sumy: Univ. Kniga, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kholodny Institute of BotanyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations