Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of the effect of pretreating aspen wood with aqueous and aqueous-organic solutions of sulfuric and nitric acid on its reactivity during enzymatic hydrolysis

  • Biocatalysis
  • Published:
Catalysis in Industry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of aspen wood pretreatment methods with the use of both aqueous solutions of sulfuric and nitric acids and aqueous-organic solutions (ethanol, butanol) of sulfuric acid (organosolv) on the limiting degree of conversion of this type of raw material into simple sugars during enzymatic hydrolysis are compared. The effects of temperature, acid concentration, composition of organic phase (for sulfuric acid), and pressure (for nitric acid) on the effectiveness of pretreatment were analyzed. It is shown that the use of organosolv with 0.5% sulfuric acid allows us to increase the reactivity of ground wood by 300–400%, compared to the initial raw material. Pretreatment with a 4.8% aqueous solution of nitric acid (125°C, 1.8 MPa, 10 min) is shown to be most effective, as it increases the reactivity of the ground aspen wood by more than 500%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bukshtynov, A.D., Groshev, B.I., and Krylov, G.V., Lesa (Forests), Moscow: Mysl’, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubki i vosstanovlenie lesa (Cutting and Regeneration of Forests), Khanbekov, I.I., Ed., Moscow: VNIILM, 1980.

  3. Johansson, T., Biomass Bioenergy, 2002, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu, J.Y., Gleisner, R., Scott, C.T., Luo, X.L., and Tian, S., Bioresour. Technol., 2011, vol. 102, no. 19, pp. 8921–8929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goshadrou, A., Karimi, K., and Lefsrud, M., Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 440–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dotsenko, G.S., Chekushina, A.V., Kondrat’eva, E.G., Pravil’nikov, A.G., Adrianov, R.M., Osipov, D.O., Sinitsyna, O.A., Korotkova, O.G., Stepanov, V.I., Novozhilov, E.V., Achil’diev, E.R., and Sinitsyn, A.P., Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Lesa—Lesnoi Vestn., 2012, no. 8. pp. 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Azarov, V.I., Burov, A.V., and Obolenskaya, A.V., Khimiya drevesiny i sinteticheskikh polimerov (Chemistry of Wood and Synthetic Polymers), St. Petersburg: SPbLTA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conde-Mejía, C., Jiménez-Gutiérrez, A., and El-Halwagi, M., Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 2012, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., and Negro, M.J., Bioresour. Technol., 2010, vol. 101, no. 13, pp. 4851–4861.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eggeman, T. and Elander, R.T., Bioresour. Technol., 2005, vol. 96, no. 18, pp. 2019–2025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Papatheofanous, M.G., Billa, E., Koullas, D.P., Monties, B., and Koukios, E.G., Bioresour. Technol., 1995, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 305–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, N., Kim, H.-Y., Koo, B.-W., Yeo, H., and Choi, I.-G., Bioresour. Technol., 2010, vol. 101, no. 18, pp. 7046–7053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hendriks, A.T.W.M. and Zeeman, G., Bioresour. Technol., 2009, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 10–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization, Wyman, C.E., Ed., Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis, 1996.

  15. Brodeur, G., Yau, E., Badal, K., Collier, J., Ramachandran, K.B., and Ramakrishnan, S., Enzyme Res., 2011, vol. 2011. doi 10.4061/2011/787532

  16. Sinitsyn, A.P., Gusakov, A.V., and Chernoglazov, V.M., Biokonversiya tsellyuloznykh materialov (Bioconversion of Cellulose Materials), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ghose, T.K., Pure Appl. Chem., 1987, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 257–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson, R.M.C., Elliot, D.C., Elliott, W.H., and Jones, K.M, Data for Biochemical Research, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y.Y., Holtzapple, M., and Ladisch, M., Bioresour. Technol., 2005, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 673–686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, X., Cheng, K., and Liu, D., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2009, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 815–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahoo, S., Seydibeyoglu M.Ö., Mohanty, A.K., and Misra, M., Biomass Bioenergy, 2011, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 4230–4237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vinardell, M.P., Ugartondo, V., and Mitjans, M., Ind. Crops Prod., 2008, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 220–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thring, R. W., Chorent, E., and Overend, R.P., Biomass, 1990, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 289–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Dotsenko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © G.S. Dotsenko, D.O. Osipov, I.N. Zorov, A.P. Sinitsyn, 2015, published in Kataliz v Promyshlennosti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dotsenko, G.S., Osipov, D.O., Zorov, I.N. et al. Comparative analysis of the effect of pretreating aspen wood with aqueous and aqueous-organic solutions of sulfuric and nitric acid on its reactivity during enzymatic hydrolysis. Catal. Ind. 8, 88–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070050416010049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070050416010049

Keywords

Navigation