Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Simulation of the Evolution of Turbulent Spots in a Supersonic Boundary Layer over a Plate

  • Published:
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations Aims and scope

Abstract

Direct numerical simulations of the evolution of turbulent spots in the boundary layer on a flat plate at a zero angle of attack at the freestream Mach number M = 6 are carried out. The propagation of artificially excited localized three-dimensional vortical disturbances with different initial amplitudes, which, when propagating downstream, develop into turbulent spots, is considered. A direct numerical simulation is performed by solving the Navier–Stokes equations for three-dimensional compressible gas flows using the in-house solver that implements an implicit shock capturing numerical scheme. It is shown that the universal quasi-monotonic numerical scheme makes it possible to correctly estimate the main characteristics of turbulent spots: the transverse spreading angle and the velocities of the leading and trailing fronts. The agreement between the parameters of the obtained spots and the results of other authors is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

REFERENCES

  1. R. Narasimha, “The laminar-turbulent transition zone in the boundary layer,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 22 (1), 29–80 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(85)90004-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. P. Clark, T. V. Jones, and J. E. LaGraff, “On the propagation of naturally-occurring turbulent spots,” J. Eng. Math. 28 (1), 1–19 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. J. Mee and C. P. Goyne, “Turbulent spots in boundary layers in a free-piston shock-tunnel flow,” Shock Waves 6 (6), 337–343 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. Mee, “Boundary-layer transition measurements in hypervelocity flows in a shock tunnel,” AIAA J. 40 (8), 1542–1548 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Krishnan and N. D. Sandham, “Effect of Mach number on the structure of turbulent spots,” J. Fluid Mech. 566, 225–234 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006002412

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Jocksch and L. Kleiser, “Growth of turbulent spots in high-speed boundary layers on a flat plate,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29 (6), 1543–1557 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Sivasubramanian and H. F. Fasel, “Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent spot in a cone boundary-layer at Mach 6,” in 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, 2010, p. AIAA 2010-4599. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4599

  8. J. A. Redford, N. D. Sandham and G. T. Roberts, “Numerical simulations of turbulent spots in supersonic boundary layers: Effects of Mach number and wall temperature,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 52, 67–79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Jewell, I. A. Leyva, and J. E. Shepherd, “Turbulent spots in hypervelocity flow,” Exp. Fluids 58 (4), 32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2317-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. V. Chuvakhov, A. V. Fedorov, and A. O. Obraz, “Numerical simulation of turbulent spots generated by unstable wave packets in a hypersonic boundary layer,” Comput. Fluids 162, 26–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.12.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Van den Eynde and J. Steelant, “Compressibility and temperature effects on turbulent spot growth,” in HiSST: Inter. Conf. on High-Speed Vehicle Science Technology, Moscow, 2018.

  12. I. V. Egorov, A. V. Novikov, and A. V. Fedorov, “Direct numerical simulation of the laminar–turbulent transition at hypersonic flow speeds on a supercomputer,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 57 (8), 1335–1359 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542517080061

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. K. S. Breuer and M. T. Landahl, “The evolution of a localized disturbance in a laminar boundary layer. Part 2. Strong disturbances,” J. Fluid Mech. 220, 595–621 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112090003391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. R. van Driest, “The problem of aerodynamic heating,” Aeronaut. Eng. Rev. 15 (8), 26−41 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 21-19-00307). It was also supported through the use of the equipment of the Center for Collective Use “Complex for Simulation and Data Processing of MegaClass Research Installations” of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute,” http://ckp.nrcki.ru/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Novikov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egorov, I.V., Novikov, A.V. & Chuvakhov, P.V. Numerical Simulation of the Evolution of Turbulent Spots in a Supersonic Boundary Layer over a Plate. Math Models Comput Simul 15, 118–124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048223010076

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048223010076

Keywords:

Navigation