Skip to main content
Log in

Generalization of Krasnoshchekov’s Model for the Case of a Decomposable Matrix of Social Interactions

  • Published:
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations Aims and scope

Abstract

In this work, Krasnoshchekov’s model, which describes the behavior of people in a community under social and informational influences, is generalized to include the case of a system with a sophisticated structure of social interaction. In particular, the situation when an isolated group of people is formed who are not familiar with the rest of the community, which corresponds to a decomposable matrix of social interactions, is studied. The conditions for the solution of the system of equations describing the behavior of such a community to exist and be unique are considered. The problem of finding the relation between Krasnoshchekov’s and De Groot’s models is solved. The way this matrix of social interactions and the social independence of individuals affect the structure of the solution of this system, which describes in particularl how beliefs spread among people, is studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. V. Grachev and I. K. Melnik, Manipulation Person: Organization, Methods and Technologies of Information-Psychological Influence (IF RAN, Moscow, 1999), Vol. 63 [in Russian].

  2. J. C. Turner, Social Influence (Cole Publ., Thomson Brooks, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. A. Gubanov, D. A. Novikov, and A. G. Chkhartishvili, Social Networks: Models of Informational Influence, Control and Confrontation (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D. A. Gubanov, D. A. Novikov, and A. G. Chkhartishvili, “Models of influence in social networks (review),” Upravl. Bol’sh. Sist., No. 27, 205–281 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. A. Gubanov, D. A. Novikov, and A. G. Chkhartishvili, “Informational influence and information control models in social networks,” Autom. Remote Control. 72, 1557–1567 (2011).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. M. Raigorodskii, Internet Models (Intellekt, Dolgoprudnyi, 2013) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Bonson, S. Royo, and M. Ratkai, “Citizens’ engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: the impact of different media and content types in Western Europe,” Government Inform. Quart. 32, 52–62 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Peters, Y. Chen, A. M. Kaplan, B. Ognibeni, and K. Pauwels, “Social media metrics–a framework and guidelines for managing social media,” J. Interact. Market. 27, 281–298 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Bond et al., “A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization,” Nature (London, U.K.) 489, 295–298 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Boulianne, “Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research,” Inform., Commun. Soc. 18, 524–538 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Stieglitz and L. Dang-Xuan, “Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework,” Social Network Anal. Mining 3, 1277–1291 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Sobkowicz, M. Kaschesky, and G. Bouchard, “Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web,” Government Inform. Quart. 29, 470–479 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. H. de Groot, “Reaching a consensus,” J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 69, 118–121 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. E. Friedkin and E. C. Johnsen, “Social influence networks and opinion change,” Adv. Group Processes 16, 1–29 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. S. Krasnoshchekov, “The simplest mathematical model of behaviour. Psychology of conformism,” Mat. Model. 10, 76–92 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. E. Asch, “Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority,” Psychol. Monographs: Gen. Appl. 70, 1 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos, “Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining ACM, 2003, pp. 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. J. Watts and P. S. Dodds, “Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation,” J. Consumer Res. 34, 441–458 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. R. Gantmacher, Matrix Theory (Chelsea, New York, 1959), Vol. 21.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. S. A. Ashmanov, Introduction to Mathematical Economics (Nauka, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Harary et al., Graph Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. A. A. Belolipetskii and I. V. Kozitsin, “Dynamic variant of mathematical model of collective behavior,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 56, 385–396 (2017).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Kozitsin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.V. Kozitsin, 2017, published in Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2017, Vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 3–15.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozitsin, I.V. Generalization of Krasnoshchekov’s Model for the Case of a Decomposable Matrix of Social Interactions. Math Models Comput Simul 10, 398–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048218040075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048218040075

Keywords

Navigation