Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experience of a Synthetic Approach to an Ecological Classification of Vascular Epiphytes

  • Published:
Contemporary Problems of Ecology Aims and scope

Abstract—

On the basis of an investigation into epiphytic ferns and taking into account the literature data, information on ecological classifications of vascular epiphytes has been summarized and a multiple ecological classification is proposed in which vascular epiphytes are grouped into three blocks of morphofunctional types (MFT): facultative epiphytes (protoepiphytes), obligate epiphytes (holoepiphytes), and hemiepiphytes. The main criterion underlying this division is the degree of specialization of plants to the epiphytic life pattern. Each group includes several subgroups diverging on the basis of the presence of special morphological structures providing epiphytes with nutrients and water under conditions of their deficit, as well as life under the conditions of low irradiation and high hydrature. Within the subgroups, the variants are distinguished and the preadaptive and adaptive mechanisms used by the epiphytes in order to cope with the specific environment are defined for the variants. Physiofunctional types with specialization to an epiphytic mode of life are distinguished as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Barkman, J.J., Phytosociology and Ecology of Cryptogamic Epiphytes, Assen: Van Gorcum, 1958, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benzing, D.H., Vascular Epiphytes: General Biology and Related Biota, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Derzhavina, N.M., Biomorphology and anatomy of homosporous ferns (epilithophytes, epiphytes, amphibious and aquatic) in connection with adaptatiogenesis, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2006.

  4. Derzhavina, N.M., Ecological anatomy of fern fronds, Modern Phytomorphol., 2013, vol. 5, pp. 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Derzhavina, N.M., Anatomical and morphological adaptations of homosporous fern Crepidomanes latealatum (Hymenophyllaceae) to specific environmental conditions, Turzchaninowia, 2018, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Es’kov, A.K., Ecophysiological classification of vascular epiphytes as a theoretical premise of building collections and communities of epiphytic plants in a hothouse culture, Estestv. Tekh. Nauki, 2012, no. 4, pp. 93–98.

  7. Gentry, A. and Dodson, C., Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard., 1987, vol. 74, pp. 205–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gladkova, V.N., Orchidaceae, in Zhizn’ rastenii (Life of the Plants), Takhtadzhyan, A.L., Ed., Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1982, vol. 6, pp. 248–275.

  9. Holbrook, N.M. and Putz, F.E., Physiology of tropical vines and hemiepiphytes: plants that climb up and plants that climb down, in Tropical Plant Ecophysiology, Mulkey, S. Chazdon, P.L., and Smith, A.P., Eds., New York: Chapman and Hall, 1995, pp. 363–393.

  10. Hosokawa, T., Ecological studies of tropical epiphytes in forest ecosystem, Adv. Trop. Ecol., 1968, vol. 2, pp. 482–501.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ignat’eva, I.P. and Andreeva, I.I., Metamorfozy vegetativnykh organov pokrytosemennykh (Metamorphoses of Vegetative Organs of Angiosperms), Moscow: Mosk. S-kh. Akad., 1991, part 1.

  12. Knapp, R., Die Vegetation von Afrika unter Berück-Sichtigung von Umwelt, Entwicklung, Wirtschaft, Agrar- und Forstgeographie. Vegetationsmonogr. der Einzelnen Großräume, Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1973, vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kress, W.J., The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes: an update, Selbyana, 1986, vol. 9, pp. 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lebrun, J., Observation sur les épiphytes de la forêt équatoriale congolaise, Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles, 1937, vol. 57, pp. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lüttge, U., Epiphyten: evolution und Ökophysiologie, Naturwissenschaften, 1985, vol. 72, pp. 557–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lüttge, U., Vascular epiphytes: setting the scene, in Vascular Plants as Epiphytes: Evolution and Ecophysiology, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 1–14.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazurenko, M.T. and Khokhryakov, A.P., Bryophyls as a specific ecological group of plants, Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1989, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Müller, L., Starnecker, G., and Winkler, S., Zur Oekologie epiphytischer Farne in Südbrasilien I. Saugschüppen, Flora, 1981, vol. 171, pp. 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliver, W.R.B., New Zealand epiphytes, J. Ecol., 1930, vol. 18, pp. 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pessin, L.J., An ecological study of the polypody fern Polypodium polypodioides as an epiphyte in Mississippi, Ecology, 1925, vol. 6, pp. 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Richards, P.W., The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruinen, J., Epiphytosis. A second view on epiphytism, Ann. Bogoriensis, 1953, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–157.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schimper, A.F.W., Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas, Botanische Mittheilungen aus den Tropen no. 2, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1888.

  24. Schimper, A.F.W. and Faber, F.C., Pflanzengeographie auf Physiologischer Grundlage, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider, H., The root anatomy of ferns: a comparative study, in Pteridology in Perspective, Kew: R. Bot. Gardens, 1996, pp. 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schnell, R., Introduction à la Phytogéographie des Pays Tropicaux: Les Problèmes Généraux, Paris: Gauthier-Vitlars, 1970, vols. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shorina, N.I. and Derzhavina, N.M., The mode of rythmological evolution of ferns, Turzchaninowia, 2015, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Terekhin, E.S., About the terms “saprophyte”, “hemisaprophyte” and “hemiparasite” in terms of the character of biotic relation of some angiosperms, Bot. Zh., 1965, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tsavkelova, E.A., Microorganisms associated with greenhouse orchids, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2003.

  30. Tsutsumi, C. and Kato, M., Phylogeny and the evolution of epiphyte in Davalliaceae, in Perspectives in Pteridophytes, Verma, S.C., Khullar, S.P., and Cheema, H.K., Eds., Dehradun: Bischen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, 2009, pp. 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Volkov, I.V., Vvedenie v ekologiyu vysokogornykh rastenii (Introduction into Ecology of High-Altitude Plants), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2002.

  32. Went, F.A., Über Haft- und Nährwurzeln bei Kletterpflanzen und Epiphyten, Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, 1895, vol. 12, pp. 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Went, F.W., Soziology der Epiphyten eines tropischen Urwaldes, Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, 1940, vol. 50, pp. 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhuk, A.V., Origin of parasitism in flowering plants, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 3: Biol., 2001, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zotz, G., The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes—a critical update, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 2013a, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 453–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zotz, G., ‘Hemiepiphyte’: a confusing term and its history, Ann. Bot., 2013b, vol. 111, pp. 1015–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zotz, G., Plants on Plants—The Biology of Vascular Epiphytes, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am sincerely grateful to I.V. Tatarenko (The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) and Prof. K. Kondo (Hiroshima University, Japan), who graciously provided the opportunity for collecting field materials as part of their expeditions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orel State University, 302026, Orel, Russia

    N. M. Derzhavina

Authors
  1. N. M. Derzhavina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. M. Derzhavina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by V. Mittova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Derzhavina, N.M. Experience of a Synthetic Approach to an Ecological Classification of Vascular Epiphytes. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 12, 434–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519050044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519050044

Keywords:

Search

Navigation