Advertisement

Contemporary Problems of Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 150–158 | Cite as

Patterns of Sandy Steppe Vegetation in the Valleys of Samara and Ural Rivers and Their Tributaries in Orenburg Oblast

  • A. Yu. Korolyuk
  • N. A. Dulepova
  • S. M. Yamalov
  • M. V. Lebedeva
  • Ya. M. Golovanov
  • A. A. Zverev
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Patterns in the organization of psammophyte vegetation of sandy steppes have been studied in Orenburg oblast. Using cluster analysis with different similarity indices, 122 relevés have been analyzed. The best cluster differentiation is achieved by the use of a Sokal/Sneath coefficient. Five types of plant communities have been distinguished and characterized. The role of anthropogenic transformation and geographical differences in a differentiation of psammophytic vegetation has been evaluated via canonical correspondence analysis.

Keywords

vegetation psammophytes Orenburg oblast cluster analysis ordination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bossuyt, B., Honnay, O., and Hermy, M., Evidence for community assembly constraints during succession in dune slack plant communities, Plant Ecol., 2005, vol. 178, pp. 201–209. doi 10.1007/s11258-004-3287-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T., An ordination of the upland forest of the Southern Wisconsin, Ecol. Monogr., 1957, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cakan, H., Yilmaz, K.T., Alphan, A., and Unlukaplan, Y., The classification and assessment of vegetation for monitoring coastal sand dune succession: the case of Tuzla in Adana, Turkey, Turk. J. Bot., 2011, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 697–711.Google Scholar
  4. Cherepanov, S.K., Sosudistye rasteniya Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv (Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent Countries), St. Petersburg: Mir i Sem’ya, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Chibilev, A.A., Priroda Orenburgskoi oblasti. Chast’ 1. Fiziko-geograficheskii i istoriko-geograficheskii ocherk (Nature of Orenburg Oblast, Part 1: Physical-Geographical and Historical-Geographic Essay), Orenburg: Orenb. Knizhn. Izd., 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Chibilev, A.A., Prirodnoe nasledie Orenburgskoi oblasti (Natural Heritage of Orenburg Oblast), Orenburg: Orenb. Knizhn. Izd., 1996.Google Scholar
  7. Chibilyov, A.A. and Ryabukha, A.G., The history of economic development and anthropogenic transformation of sandy lands in the steppe zone of Orenburg oblast, Arid Ecosyst., 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chibilev, A.A., Shipek, T., Snytko, V.A., Vika, S., Chibileva, V.P., Petrishchev, V.P., Kin, N.O., Ryabukha, A.G., and Ismakov, R.A., Eolovye stepnye urochishcha Ilek-Khobdinskogo mezhdurech’ya (Orenburzh’e) (Aeolian Steppe Natural Landmarks of Ilek-Khobdinsk Interfluve (Orenburg Oblast)), Orenburg: Inst. Stepi, Ural. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Czekanowski, J., “Coefficient of racial likeness” und “durchsehnittliche Differenz,” Anthropol. Anz., 1932, vol. 9, pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
  10. Dengler, J., Berg, C., and Jansen, F., New ideas for modern phytosociological monographs, Ann. Bot., Nuova Ser., 2005, vol. 5, pp. 49–66.Google Scholar
  11. Dice, L.R., Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species, Ecology, 1945, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gael’, A.G., Sends of Upper Don River, Izv. Gos. Geogr. O-va, 1932, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
  13. Gael’, A.G. and Smirnova, L.F., Peski i peschanye pochvy (Sands and Sandy Soils), Moscow: GEOS, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Gael’, A.G. and Trushkovskii, A.A., Phases of deflation and age of soils on aeolian sands of steppe zones of Soviet Union, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., 1962, no. 6, pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
  15. Garcia-Mora, M.R., Gallego-Fernandez, J.B., and Garcia-Novo, F., Plant functional types in coastal foredunes in relation to environmental stress and disturbance, J. Veg. Sci., 1999, vol. 10, pp. 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, T. and Lewicki, P., STATISTICS Methods and Applications, Tulsa: StatSoft, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Kashtanov, A.N., Pavlovskii, E.S., Kulik, K.N., Svintsov, I.P., et al., Agrolesomeliorativnaya Nauka v XX veke (Agroforestmeliorative Science in 20th Century), Volgograd: Vseross. Nauchno.-Issled. Inst. Agrolesomeliorats., 2001.Google Scholar
  18. Krasnaya kniga Orenburgskoi oblasti (The Red Data Book of Orenburg Oblast), Vasil’ev, A.S., Orenburg: Orenb. Knizhn. Izd., 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Krasnaya kniga Rossiiskoi Federatsii (rasteniya i griby) (The Red Data Book of Russian Federation: Plants and Fungi), Bardunov, L.V. and Kamelin, R.V., Eds., Moscow, 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Kuiters, A.T., Kramer, K., van der Hagen, H.G.J.M., and Schaminee, J.H.J., Plant diversity, species turnover and shifts in functional traits in coastal dune vegetation: results from permanent plots over a 52-year period, J. Veg. Sci., 2009, vol. 20, pp. 1053–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavrenko, E.M., Steppes of Soviet Union, in Rastitel’nost’ SSSR (Vegetation of Soviet Union), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940, vol. 2, pp. 1–207.Google Scholar
  22. Lavrenko, E.M., Karamysheva, Z.V., and Nikulina, R.I., Stepi Evrazii (Steppes of Eurasia), Leningrad: Nauka, 1991. Malyshev, L.I., Floristic zonation based on qualitative features, Bot. Zh., 1973, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1581–1602.Google Scholar
  23. Michl, T., Dengler, J., and Huck, S., Montana-subalpine tall-herb vegetation (Mulgedio-Aconitetea) in central Europe: large-scale synthesis and comparison with northern Europe, Phytocoenologia, 2010, vol. 40, nos. 2–3, pp. 117–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pesenko, Yu.A., Printsipy i metody kolichestvennogo analiza v faunisticheskikh issledovaniyakh (Principles and Methods of Quantitative Analysis in Faunistic Studies), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.Google Scholar
  25. Petrov, M.P., Podvizhnye peski i bor’ba s nimi (Mobile Sands and Their Prevention), Moscow: Geografgiz, 1950.Google Scholar
  26. Polevaya geobotanika (Field Geobotany), Lavrenko, E.M. and Korchagin, A.A., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1964, vol. 3.Google Scholar
  27. Postanovlenie pravitel’stva Orenburgskoi oblasti no. 229-p ot 16.04.2014 o vnesenii izmeneniya v postanovlenie Pravitel’stva Orenburgskoi oblasti ot 26 yanvarya 2012 goda no. 67-p “O Krasnoi knige Orenburgskoi oblasti (vmeste s Polozheniem o Krasnoi knige Orenburgskoi oblasti, Perechnem (spiskom) vidov zhivotnykh organizmov, zanesennykh v Krasnuyu knigu Orenburgskoi oblasti)” (Resolution of the Governement of Orenburg Oblast No. 229-p of April 16, 2014 on Approval of Changes in Resolution of the Government of Orenburg Oblast No. 67-p of January 26, 2012 “On the Red Data Book of Orenburg Oblast (Together with Decision on the Red Data Book of Orenburg Oblast, The List of Species of Animals from the Red Data Book of Orenburg Oblast)”), Orenburg, 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Problemy endogennogo rel’efoobrazovaniya (The Problems of Endogenic Relief Formation), Florensov, N.A., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  29. Ramenskii, L.G., Tsatsenkin, I.A., Chizhikov, O.N., and Antipin, N.A., Ekologicheskaya otsenka kormovykh ugodii po rastitel’nomu pokrovu (Ecological Evaluation of Fodder Resources by Vegetation), Moscow: Sel’khozgiz, 1956.Google Scholar
  30. Rohlf, F.J. and Sokal, R.R., Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 1965, vol. 45, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  31. Ryabinina, Z.N., Rastitel’nyi pokrov stepei Yuzhnogo Urala (Orenburgskaya oblast’) (Vegetation Cover of the Steppes of Southern Ural (Orenburg Oblast)), Orenburg: Orenb. Gos. Pedagog. Univ., 2003.Google Scholar
  32. Ryabukha, A.G., Historical data on the sand lands of Russia and adjacent countries, Byull. Orenb. Nauch. Tsentra, Ural. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2012, no. 4, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  33. Ryabukha, A.G., Genetic features of sandy soils of Orenburg oblast, Izv. Orenb. Gos. Agrar. Univ., Biol. Nauki, 2014, no. 5 (4), pp. 176–180.Google Scholar
  34. Sokal, R.R. and Sneath, P.H.A., Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1963.Google Scholar
  35. Sørensen, T., A new method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analysis of the vegetation on Danish commons, Biol. Skr.-K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., 1948, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  36. Telyatnikov, M.Yu., Comparison of local floras in vicinity of the Pyasino Lake, Rastit. Mir Aziat. Ross., 2009, no. 1 (3), pp. 60–67.Google Scholar
  37. Ward, J.H., Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1963, vol. 58, no. 301, pp. 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, J., Zhao, H., Zhang, T., Zhao, X., and Drake, S., Community succession along a chronosequence of vegetation restoration on sand dunes in Horqin Sandy Land, J. Arid Environ., 2005, vol. 62, pp. 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zonn, I.S., Nikolaev, V.N., Orlovskii, N.S., and Svintsov, I.P., Opyt bor’by s opustynivaniem v SSSR (Counteraction Desertification in Soviet Union), Moscow: Nauka, 1981, pp. 23–51.Google Scholar
  40. Zverev, A.A., Infomatsionnye tekhnologii v issledovaniyakh rastitel’nogo pokrova (Information Technologies in Studies of Vegetation), Tomsk: TML-Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Yu. Korolyuk
    • 1
  • N. A. Dulepova
    • 1
  • S. M. Yamalov
    • 2
  • M. V. Lebedeva
    • 2
  • Ya. M. Golovanov
    • 2
  • A. A. Zverev
    • 3
  1. 1.Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Ufa Botanical GardenRepublic of Bashkortostan, UfaRussia
  3. 3.Тomsk State UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations