Skip to main content
Log in

Certain methodical aspects of experiments studying the nutrition of caterpillars of the Gypsy moth

  • Published:
Contemporary Problems of Ecology Aims and scope

Abstract

It is shown that there are a number of factors that are important to consider when planning the experiments on studying the trophic parameters of the caterpillars of the Gypsy moth, first of all, the population characteristics of the species including the sex and age structure that change annually. The final results of the study are also influenced by some procedures during the experiments, particularly, the duration (especially in the longest instars of the caterpillars) and volume of the sampling, which is supposed to grow as the caterpillars instar increases. The expediency is examined for using the individual growing of the caterpillars to study the species nutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Barbosa and J. Greenblatt, “Suitability, Digestibility and Assimilation of Various Host Plants of the Gypsy Moth Lymantria dispar L.,” Oecologia 43(1), 111 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. A. Vshivkova, “Ecological-Physiological Parameters of Growth of Caterpillars of Gypsy Moth on Basic Host Plants in Siberia,” in Role of Relationships Plant-Insect in the Dynamics of Number of Forest Pests (Krasnoyarsk, 1983), pp. 126–137 [in Russian].

  3. Yu. N. Baranchikov, Trophic Specialization of Lepidopterans (Krasnoyarsk, 1987) [in Russian].

  4. Sh.-Y. Hwang and R. L. Lindroth, “Clonal Variation in Foliar Chemistry of Aspen: Effect on Gypsy Moths and Forest Tent Caterpillars,” Oecologia 111, 99 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Lazarevic, V. Peric-Mataruga, B. Stojkovic, and N. Tucic, “Adaptation of the Gypsy Moth to an Unsuitable Host Plant,” Entomol. Exp. et Appl. 102, 75 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. M. Andreeva, V. I. Ponomarev, and N. V. Shatalin, “Morphophysiological and Trophic Characteristics of Caterpillars of Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.) of Two Populations Depending on Hydrothermal Conditions and Population Density,” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 86(3), 503 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. M. Andreeva, “Trophic Aspects of Ecology of Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.),” Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Yekaterinburg, 2002).

  8. M.W. Henn and R. Schopf, “Response of Beech (Fagus sylvatica) to Elevated CO2 and N: Influence on Larval Performance of the Gypsy Moth Lymantria dispar (Lep., Lymantriidae),” J. Appl. Ent. 125, 501 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. V. Il’inykh, “Optimized Artificial Nutritional Medium for Growth of the Gypsy Moth (Ocneria dispar L.),” Biotekhnologiya, No. 1, 42 (1996).

  10. G. P. Waldbauer, “The Consumption and Utilization of Food by Insects,” Adv. Insect. Physiol. 5, 229 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. M. Andreeva, “On Duration of Development of Larval Instars, Caterpillar Stage and Weight of Pupae of the Gypsy Moth during Depression,” in Entomological Studies in West Siberia. Proceedings by Kemerovo Division of Russian Entomological Society (Yuniti, Kemerovo, 2008), Issue 6, pp. 3–10 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. M. Edel’man, “Biology of the Gypsy Moth in Quba Rayon of Azerbaijan SSR,” Zoologicheskii Zh. 35(4), 572 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. M. Kireeva, Ecology and Physiology of the Gypsy Moth (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. Il’inskii, Gypsy Moth and How to Fight It (Goslesbumizdat, Moscow, 1959) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Carisey and E. Bauce, “Impact of Balsam Fir Flowering on Pollen and Foliage Biochemistry in Relation to Spruce Budworm Growth, Development, and Food Utilization,” Entomol. Exp. et Appl. 85, 17 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. T. L. Osier and R. L. Lindroth, “Long-Term Effects of Defoliation on Quaking Aspen in Relation to Genotype and Nutrient Availability: Plant Growth, Phytochemistry, and Insect Performance,” Oecologia 139, 55 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D. E. Leonard, “Effects of Starvation on Behavior Number of Larval Instars, and Developmental Rate of Porthetria Dispar,” J. Insect Physiol. 16, 25 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. A. Vshivkova, “Analysis of Growth and Development of Caterpillars from Two Isolated Populations of the Gypsy Moth,” in Gypsy Moth in Central and East Siberia (Novosibirsk, 1982), pp. 35–42 [in Russian].

  19. S. Nagasawa, “Nubmer of Larval Instars of the Gypsy Moth in Japan (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae),” Appl. Entomol. Zool. 23(4), 441 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. A. Stockhoff, “Diet Heterogeneity: Implications for Growth of a Generalist Herbivore, the Gypsy Moth,” Ecology 74(7), 1939 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. K. Kinney, R. L. Lindroth, S. M. Jung, and E.V. Nordheim, “Effects of CO2 and NO3 — Availability on Deciduous Trees: Phytochemistry and Insect Performance,” Ecology 78(1), 215 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. L. Lindroth, K. A. Klein, J. D. C. Hemming, and A. M. Feuker, “Variation in Temperature and Dietary Nitrogen Affect Performance of the Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.),” Physiol. Entomol. 22(1), 55 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Lazarevic, V. Peric-Mataruga, J. Ivanovic, and M. Andjelkovic, “Host Plant on the Genetic Variation and Correlation in the Individual Performance of the Gypsy Moth,” Functional Ecol., No. 12, 141 (1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Andreeva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.M. Andreeva, 2012, published in Sibirskii Ekologicheskii Zhurnal, 2012, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 57–64.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreeva, E.M. Certain methodical aspects of experiments studying the nutrition of caterpillars of the Gypsy moth. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 5, 40–45 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425512010055

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425512010055

Keywords

Navigation