Forest soil fertility: the base of relationships between soil and vegetation

Abstract

To understand the relationships between soils and vegetation in forest ecosystems, it is necessary to establish the spatial levels where they are implemented and to determine parameters characterizing the relationships. The key step in the development of the hierarchy of the spatial levels is the establishment of the elementary unit of the soil-vegetation cover. Such a unit, called tessera, is substantiated. Studies conducted in boreal forests have demonstrated a close association between the vegetation and soil components of tesserae. It can be quantitatively described in terms of informative fertility parameters: pH; C: N ratio; contents of nutrients, such as Ca and Mn; etc. Thus, data on the relationships between soil and vegetation determined in tesserae can be summarized at higher spatial levels of the forest cover: parcel, biotope, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    V. M. Fridland, Problems of the Geography of Soil Genesis and Classification (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    L. O. Karpachevskii, Variegation of the Soil Cover in Forest Ecosystems (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    L. G. Ramenskii, Introduction to Combined Soil-Geobotanical Study of Lands (Sel’khozgiz, Moscow-Leningrad, 1938) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    N. Van Breemen and A. C. Fienzi, “Plant-Soil Interactions: Ecological Aspects and Evolutionary Implications,” Biogeochemistry 42, 1 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    N. V. Lukina, T. T. Gorbacheva, V. V. Nikonov, and M. A. Lukina, “Spatial Variability of the Acidity of Al-Fe-Humic Podzols,” Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 163 (2002).

  6. 6.

    N. V. Lukina and V. V. Nikonov, Biogeochemical Cycles in Northern Forests Subjected to Industrial Air Pollution (Izd. Karel’skogo Nauchnogo Tsentra, Apatity, 1996), parts 1–2 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    C. Rhoades, “Single-Tree Influence on Soil Properties in Agroforestry Systems: Lessons from Natural and Savanna Ecosystems,” Agrofor. Syst. 35, 71 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    N. V. Dylis, Structure of the Forest Ecosystem. Komarov Lectures (Nauka, Moscow, 1969), Vol. 21 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    V. V. Nikonov, N. V. Lukina, E. V. Smirnova, and L. G. Isaeva, “Effect of Spruce and Pine of the Formation of Primary Production in Lower Layers of Conifer Forests of the Kola Peninsula,” Botanicheskii Zh. 87(8), 112 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    H. Jenny, “Role of the Plant Factor in the Pedogenic Functions,” Ecology 39, 5 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    N. V. Lukina, T. A. Sukhareva, and L. G. Isaeva, Technogenic Degradation and Secondary Successions in Northern Taiga Forests (Nauka, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    N. V. Lukina, L. M. Polyanskaya, and M. A. Orlova, Nutrition Regime in Soils of Northern Taiga Forests (Nauka, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    N. V. Lukina and V. V. Nikonov, The State of Northern Spruce Biotopes Subjected to Industrial Pollution (Izd. Karel’skogo Nauchnogo Tsentra, Apatity, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    V. N. Sukachev, SelectedWorks. Fundamentals of Forest Typology and Biogeocenology (Nauka, Leningrad Division, Leningrad, 1972), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    A. Ya. Gordyagin, “Materials for Knowledge of Soils and Vegetation in West Siberia,” Trudy Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei pri Kazanskom Universitete, 34(3) (1900); 35 (2) (1901).

  16. 16.

    A. A. Korchagin, “Influence of Fires on Forest Vegetation and Its Restoration after Fires in Northern Europe,” Geobotanika 9, 75 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    F. V. Sambuk, “Pechora Forests,” in Trudy Botanicheskogo Muzeya (Izd. Akademii Nauk SSSR Moscow, 1932), Issue XXIV, pp. 63–251 [in Russian].

  18. 18.

    P.-A. Esseen, B. Ehnstrom, L. Ericson, and K. Sjoberg, “Boreal Forests,” Ecological Bulletins 46, 16 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    A. G. Lapenis, “Fundamentals of Biogeochemical Selection of Organisms and Directed Biosphere Evolution,” in V. V. Nikonov, N. V. Lukina, V. S. Bezel’, et al., Dispersed Elements in Boreal Forests, Ed. by A. S. Isaev (Nauka, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    N. P. Remezov, “More about the Role of Forest in Soil Formation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 70 (1956).

  21. 21.

    N. P. Remezov, “Role of Forest in Soil Formation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 12, 68 (1953).

  22. 22.

    A. A. Rode, “On the Role of Forest in Soil Formation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 50 (1954).

  23. 23.

    S. V. Zonn, “On Interaction Between Forest Vegetation and Soil,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 51 (1954).

  24. 24.

    V. V. Ponomareva and N. S. Sotnikova, “Regularities of Migration and Accumulation of Elements in Podzols (Lysimetrical Studies),” in Biogeochemical Processes in Podzol Soils (Nauka, Leningrad Division, Leningrad, 1972), pp. 6–56 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    N. L. Kazimirov and R. M. Morozova, Biotic Turnover of Substances in Karelia Spruce Stands (Nauka, Leningrad Division, Leningrad, 1973) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    K. N. Manakov and V. V. Nikonov, Biotic Turnover of Mineral Elements and Soil Formation in High North Spruce Stands (Nauka, Leningrad Division, Leningrad, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    E. P. Odum, Basic Ecology (Saunders College Pub., 1983).

  28. 28.

    F. Berense, “Effects of Dominant Plant Species on Soils during Succession in Nutrient-Poor Ecosystems,” Biogeochemistry 42, 73 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    N. V. Lukina, V. V. Nikonov, and L. G. Isaeva, “Acidity and Nutrition Regime in Soils of Spruce Forests,” in Primary Spruce Forests: Biodiversity, Structure, and Functions (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    J.-F. Ponge, “Humus Forms in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Framework to Biodiversity,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 935 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    L. O. Karpachevskii, Forest and Forest Soils (Lesnaya Promyshlennost’, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    H. W. Zoettl and R. F. Huettl, Management of Nutrition in Forests Under Stress (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991).

  33. 33.

    V. S. Shumakov, Types of Forestry Crops and Soil Fertility (Goslesbumizdat, Moscow, 1963) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    V. S. Shumakov, “Increase of Forest Productivity with Mineral Fertilizers,” in Increase of Forest Productivity by Silvicultural Methods (Goslesbumizdat, Moscow, 1977), pp. 45–58 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    S. A. Barber, Bioavailability of Nutrients in Soil (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    V. B. Il’in, Heavy Metals in the Soil-Vegetation System (Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    D. S. Orlov, Soil Chemistry (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    T. Nasholm, A. Ekblad, A. Nordin, R. Giesler, M. Hogberg, et al., “Boreal Forest Plants Take up Organic Nitrogen,” Nature 392, 914 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    D. J. Read and J. Perez-Moreno, “Mycorrhizas and Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystem—a Journey towards Relevance?” New Phytol. 157, 475 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    N. C. Brady, The Nature and Properties of Soils (Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    V. V. Ponomareva, Theory of Podzol Formation (Biochemical Aspects) (Nauka, Moscow-Leningrad, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    V. V. Ponomareva and N. P. Sotnikova, “Regularities of Migration and Accumulation of Elements in Podzols,” in: Biogeochemical Processes in Podzol Soils (Nauka, Leningrad Division, Leningrad, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    M. Salemaa, J. Derome, and P. Nöjd, “Response of Boreal Forest Vegetation to the Fertility Status of the Organic Layer along a Climatic Gradient,” Boreal Env., Res. 13 (Suppl. B), 48 (2008).

  44. 44.

    N. V. Lukina and V. V. Nikonov, Nutrition Regime of Northern Taiga Forests: Natural and Technogenic Aspects (Izd. Karel’skogo Nauchnogo Tsentra, Apatity, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    M. A. Orlova, N. V. Lukina, and V. V. Nikonov, “Effect of Spruce on the Spatial Variability of Acidity in Podzols of Northern Taiga Forests,” Lesovedenie, No. 6, 3 (2003).

  46. 46.

    T. Ingestad, “Mineral Nutrient Requirements of Vaccinium vitisidaea and Vaccinium myrtillus,” Physiol. Plant., No. 29, 239 (1973).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Lukina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.V. Lukina, M.A. Orlova, L.G. Isaeva, 2010, published in Lesovedenie, 2010, No. 5, pp. 45–56.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lukina, N.V., Orlova, M.A. & Isaeva, L.G. Forest soil fertility: the base of relationships between soil and vegetation. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 4, 725–733 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425511070046

Download citation

Keywords

  • forest ecosystems
  • elementary unit of the soil-vegetation cover
  • tessera
  • soil fertility