Influence of temperature on fractional composition of proteins and respiration of germinating seeds of Gmelin and Siberian larch

  • O. V. Masyagina
  • S. G. Prokushkin
  • M. Yu. Sadilova


The influence of optimal and contrasting temperatures on the fractional composition of proteins and respiration of germinating seeds of Gmelin larch (Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Rupr.) and Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) was revealed. The dominance of globulins (salt-soluble fraction) and insoluble proteins was noted in viable air-dry seeds of larch. Optimal and contrasting temperatures of germination of seeds caused significant changes in the content and dynamics of separate fractions of protein, the contrasting temperatures causing greater changes: increasing in the content of insoluble proteins, intense consumption of globulins at separate stages of germination. Respiration of the seeds during germination at contrasting temperatures also increased more than at an optimal temperature. Thermal regime of germination affected the character of relations between the respiration rate and contents of different protein fractions.

Key words

fractional composition of proteins Gmelin and Siberian larch influence of temperature respiration of seeds 


  1. 1.
    A. P. Abaimov, A. I. Bondarev, O. A. Zyryanova, and S. A. Shitova, Polar Forests of Krasnoyarsk Region (Novosibirsk, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. G. Prokushkin, Mineral Nutrition of Pine (on Cold Soils) (Novosibirsk, 1982) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. E. Novitskaya, P. F. Chikina, and G. I. Sofronova, Physiological and Biochemical Basins for Growth and Adaptation of Pine in the North (Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. G. Prokushkin, L. N. Kaverzina, and G. G. Polyakova, Izv. SO AN SSSR. Ser. Biol. 13(2), 60 (1986).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.A. Miroslavov, Botanicheskii Zh. 79, 20 (1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. E. Sudachkova, I. V. Shein, L. I. Romanova, and I. L. Milyutin, Biochemical Indicators of Stress in Plants (Novosibirsk, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. K. Voinikov, M. V. Korytov, and E. A. Kalacheva, Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 36, 107 (1989).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. F Titov, V. V. Talanova, and T. V. Akimova, Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 50, 94 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Kasperska-Palacz, M. Jasinska, A. Sobczyk, and B. Wcislinka, Biol. Plan. Acad. Sci. Bogemosl. 19, 10 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kung Seong-Mo and J. S. Titus, J. Hort. Sci. 62 281 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. G. Nikolaeva, I. V. Lyanguzova, and L. M. Pozdova, Biology of Seeds (St. Petersburg, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. F. Thomashow, Ann. Rev. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 571 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. A. Semikhatova, in 48th Timiryazev Lectures (Leningrad, 1990), pp. 49–55 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. A. Semikhatova, Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 42, 312 (1995).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. K. Romanova, L. G. Kuznetsova, and E. V. Golovina, in Nitrogen and Carbohydrate Nutrition of Plants and their Relationships during Photosynthesis (Pushchino, 1987), pp. 39–57 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. A. Zabuga, “Ecological and Physiological Aspects of Production of Scots Pine in Forest-Steppe Predbaikalia,” Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Irkutsk, 2006).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. I. Korovin, Role of Temperature in Mineral Nutrition of Plants (Leningrad, 1972) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. A. Shcherbakova, Determination of Quality of the Seeds of Coniferous Species Using X-Rays (Krasnoyarsk, 1965) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. I. Korotkii, S. G. Prokushkin, and L. N. Kaverzina, Lesovedenie, No. 5, 53 (2002).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Lyr, H. Polster, and H.-J. Fiedler, Gehölzphysiologie (Fischer Verlag, Jena, 1967; Moscow, 1974).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kh. N. Pochinok, Methods of Biochemical Analysis of Plants (Kiev, 1976) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. F. Lakin, Biometry (Moscow, 1973) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Minamikawa, Plant and Cell Physiol. 24, 1361 (1983).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    O. A. Novozhilova and L. P. Aref’ev, Izv. SO RAN. Ser. Biol., No. 2, 209 (1993).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. F. Semikhov, Byul. MOIP, Otd. Biol. 94, 9 (1989).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. A. Sergeeva, Physiological and Biochemical Grounds for Winter-Tolerance of Tree Plants (Mocsow, 1971) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. M. Luk’yanova, T. N. Lokteva, and T. M. Bulycheva, Gas-Exchange and Pigment System of Kola Subarctic’s Plants (Khibiny Mountains) (Apatity, 1986) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. K. Golovko, Respiration of Plants (Physiological Aspects) (St. Petersburg, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. V. Rogozhin, “Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Formation fo Hypobiotic States of Higher Plants,” Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Irkutsk, 2000).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    B. A. Rubin, Course on Physiology of Plants (Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. V. Masyagina
    • 1
  • S. G. Prokushkin
    • 1
  • M. Yu. Sadilova
    • 1
  1. 1.V. N. Sukachev Institute of ForestSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations