Advertisement

Inland Water Biology

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 196–199 | Cite as

Comparative assessment of toxic effects of surfactants using biotesting methods

  • E. V. Evsyunina
  • D. O. Taran
  • D. I. StomEmail author
  • M. N. Saksonov
  • A. E. Balayan
  • M. A. Kirillova
  • E. N. Esimbekova
  • V. A. Kratasyuk
Aquatic Toxicology

Abstract

This study assesses the comparative sensitivity and possibility of obtaining fast results of various methods of biotesting for several surfactants: Tween 85, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Fairy dishwashing gel, and Mif washing powder. The following test organisms are used for the study: luminescent bacteria Photobacterium phosphoreum (Beijerinck), preparation of Ecolum luminescent bacteria, unicellular algae Scenedesmus quadricauda (G.M. Smith), infusorian Paramecium caudatum (Ehrenberg), and crustacean Daphnia magna (Straus). It has been revealed that Fairy dishwashing gel possesses the strongest toxicity against the studied test objects. Daphnia and algae are most sensitive to the effects of Fairy and SDS, protozoan and luminescent bacteria are most sensitive to SDS, and Ecolum is most sensitive to Mif washing powder. The tested aquatic organisms and Ecolum are most tolerant to the effect of Tween 85.

Keywords

surfactants biotesting toxic effect survival daphnia algae infusorian bioluminescent bacteria fluorescence of chlorophyll 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goryunova, S.V. and Ostroumov, S.A., The effect of anionic detergent on the green protococcal alga and seedlings of some angiosperms, Nauch. Dokl. Vyssh. Shk. Biol. Nauki, 1986, no. 7, pp. 84–86.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Danilov, V.S., Yudina, T.P., and Sorokina, E.V., Extending the possibilities of a luminescent bacteria test for analyzing the toxicity of chemical compounds, Vestn. Orenb. Gos. Univ., 2007, no. 75, pp. 102–104.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deryabin, D.G., Bakterial’naya biolyuminestsentsiya: fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty (Bacterial Bioluminescence: Fundamental and Applied Aspects), Moscow: Nauka, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markina, Zh.V., Effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on the growth dynamics and physiological state of the microalga Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyta), Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2010, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melekhova, O.P., Sarapul’tseva, E.I., Evseeva, T.I., et al., Biologicheskii kontrol’ okruzhayushchei sredy. Bioindikatsiya i biotestirovanie (Biological Control of the Environment: Bioindication and Biological Testing), Moscow: Akademiya, 2010.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    FR 1.39.2007.03223: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vod, vodnykh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnykh vod i otkhodov po izmeneniyu urovnya fluorestsentsii khlorofilla i chislennosti kletok vodoroslei (Method for Determination of Toxicity of Water, Water Extracts from Soils, Sewage Sludge, and Wastes by the Change in the Chlorophyll Fluorescence Level and the Number of Algal Cells), Moscow: Akvaros, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    PND FT14.1:2:3:4.11-04; 16.1:2.3:3.8-04: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vody i vodnykh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnykh vod i otkhodov po izmeneniyu intensivnosti bakterial’noi biolyuminestsentsii test-sistemoi “Ekolyum” (Method for Determination of Toxicity of Water, Water Extracts from Soils, Sewage Sludge, and Wastes by the Change in the Chlorophyll Fluorescence using the Ecolum Test System), Moscow: NERA-S, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    FR 1.39.2007.03222: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vody i vodnykh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnykh vod, otkhodov po smertnosti i izmeneniyu plodovitosti dafnii (Method for Determination of Toxicity of Water, Water Extracts from Soils, Sewage Sludge, and Wastes by the Mortality and Change in Fertility of Daphnia), Moscow: Akvaros, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    FR. 1.39.2006.02506, PNDF 14.1:2:3.13-06 16.1:2.3:3.10- 06: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti otkhodov, pochv, osadkov stochnykh, poverkhnostnykh i gruntovykh vod metodom blokirovaniya s ispol’zovaniem ravnoresnichnykh infuzorii (Paramecium caudatum Ehrenberg) (Method for determination of toxicity of wastes, soils, and sludge of sewage, surface, and ground waters by the blocking technique using holotrich ciliates (Paramecium caudatum Ehrenberg)), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ostroumov, S.A., Biologicheskie effekty pri vozdeistvii poverkhnostno-aktivnykh veshchestv na organizm (Biological Effects of Surfactants on the Organism), Moscow: MAKS-Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ostroumov, S.A., The effect of synthetic surfactants on the hydrobiological mechanisms of water self-purification, Water Resour., 2004, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 502–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prisnyi, A.V., Volynkin, Yu.L., and Kampos, N.N., Mechanisms of resistance of ciliates to chemical damage and overcoming them using lethal concentrations of synthetic surfactants, Nauch. Ved., 2009, no. 11 (66), pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kudryasheva, N., Vetrova, T., Kuznetsov, A., et al., Bioluminescence assays: effects of guinones and phenols, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 2002, vol. 53, pp. 221–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewis, P.A., Differences in acute toxicity test results of three reference toxicants on daphnia at two temperatures, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 1991, vol. 10, pp. 1351–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villegas-Navarro, A., The heart of Daphnia magna: effects of four cardioactive drugs, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 2003, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 127–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Evsyunina
    • 1
  • D. O. Taran
    • 1
  • D. I. Stom
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • M. N. Saksonov
    • 1
  • A. E. Balayan
    • 1
  • M. A. Kirillova
    • 2
  • E. N. Esimbekova
    • 2
    • 5
  • V. A. Kratasyuk
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Irkutsk State UniversityIrkutskRussia
  2. 2.Siberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia
  3. 3.Baikal MuseumListvyanka, Irkutsk oblastRussia
  4. 4.National Research Irkutsk State Technical UniversityIrkutskRussia
  5. 5.Institute of Biophysics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations