Inland Water Biology

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 344–350 | Cite as

Effect of the insecticide Tanrec® on reproduction and vital activity of Daphnia magna Straus in a 15-day test

Aquatic Toxicology
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of the insecticide Tanrec® at concentrations of 3.0 × 10−7, 3.0 × 10−2, and 3.0 × 10−1 mg/L (as of imidacloprid) on Daphnia magna Straus has been studied. An acute toxic effect of this insecticide at a concentration of 3.0 × 10−1 mg/L and a depressive effect at concentrations of 3.0 × 10−2 mg/L and 3.0 × 10−7 have been revealed. A damaging effect of Tanrec was revealed during the stage of early development of studied crustaceans. This effect was manifested in the inhibition of the growth of oocytes, abnormal functioning of the intestine, retardation of body growth, and pathological changes in tissues.

Keywords

Tanrec® imidacloprid Daphnia magna 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    GN 1.2.1323-03. Gigienicheskie normativy soderzhaniya pestitsidov v ob”ektakh okruzhayushchei sredy (perechen’) (HN 1.2.1323-03. Hygiene Norms (HN) for Chemicals and Pesticides in the External Entities (Checklist)), Moscow: Minzdrav Rossii, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davydovskii, I.V., Obshchaya patologiya cheloveka (General Human Pathology), Moscow: Meditsina, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Illarionov, A.I. and Derkach, A.A., Toxicity and Degree of Hazard of Neonicotinoids to the Honey Bee, Agrokhimiya, 2008, no. 10, pp. 74–81.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Insecticide Tanrek®. Presentation of the Avgust Company. http://www.firm-august.ru/product/?country=rf&drug-type=73&drug-id=1082
  5. 5.
    Kostina, M.N., Mal’tseva, M.M., Lopatina, Yu.V., et al., Imidacloprid—a new substance for the development of insecticides in Russia, Dezinfekts. Delo, 2004, no. 3, pp. 50–53.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krivoshchekov, S.G., Leutin, V.P., Divert, V.E., et al., Systemic mechanisms of adaptation and compensation, Byul. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 2004, no. 2, pp. 128–153.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lesnikov, L.A., Method of assessing the effect of water from natural water bodies on Daphnia magna Straus, in Metodiki biologicheskikh issledovanii po vodnoi toksikologii (Methods of Biological Research on Aquatic Toxicology), Moscow: Nauka, 1971, pp. 157–166.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Makrushin, A.V., The use of histological techniques in toxicological studies in Daphnia, Izv. Gos. NII Ozer. Rech. Ryb. Khoz., 1974, vol. 98, pp. 40–43.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Makrushin, A.V., Histopathological examination of some cladocerans of the Rybinsk Reservoir, Zool. Zh., 1995, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 128–130.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makrushin, A.V. and Golubkov, S.M., Histopathological examination of Cladocera (Crustacea) from the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland, Region. Ekol., 2010, no. 4 (30), pp. 31–39.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orbeli, L.O., Evolutionary principle in physiology, in Problemy sovetskoi fiziologii, biokhimii i farmakologii. VII Vsesoyuz. s”ezd fiziologov, biokhimikov i farmakologov (Problems of Soviet Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology: VII All-Union Congress of Physiologists, Biochemists, and Pharmacologists), Moscow: Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1949, vol. 1, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papchenkova, G.A., Effect of insecticide Kinmiks on juvenile Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera), Toksikol. Vestn., 2011, no. 4, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papchenkova, G.A., Golovanova, I.L., and Ushakova, N.V., The parameters of reproduction, sizes, and activities of hydrolases in Daphnia magna Straus of successive generations affected by roundup herbicide, Inland Water Biol., 2009, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 286–291. DOI: 10.1134/S1995082909030158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papchenkova, G.A. and Grebenyuk, L.P., Effect of sublethal concentrations of the roundup herbicide on the size, fecundity, and morphological parameters of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera), Toksikol. Vestn., 2008, no. 4, pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarkisov, D.S., O primenenii plasticheskikh mass v gistologicheskoi tekhnike (Application of Plastics in Histological Techniques), Leningrad: Izd. Voenno-Mor. Med. Akad, 1951.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simonovich, E.I. and Kazadaev, A.A., The biological efficacy of plant protection products (regent-800, aktara, and konfidor) from the Colorado potato beetle on potato in the Rostov oblast, Dokl. Ros. Akad. S.-kh. Nauk, 2010, no. 2, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Syarki, M.T. and Kalinkina, N.M., Assessment of the effect that sodium lignosulfonate, the main component of wastewaters of pulp and paper industry, has on the state of natural and laboratory cladoceran populations, Inland Water Biol., 2010, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 369–387. DOI: 10.1134/S1995082910040115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toxicological control methods, in Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vody po smertnosti i izmeneniyu plodovitosti dafnii (Methods of Determining the Toxicity of Water by the Mortality and Fecundity Changes in Daphnia), Moscow: Gos. Komitet RF po Okhrane Okruzhayushchei Sredy, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehlhorn, H., Mencke, N., and Hansen, O., Effects of imidacloprid on adult and larval stages of the flea Ctenocephalides felis after in vivo and in vitro application: a light- and electron-microscopy study, Parasitol. Res., 1999, vol. 85, pp. 625–637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pautou, M.-P., Rey, D., and Meyran, J.-C., Toxicity of vegetable tannins on Crustacea associated with alpine mosquito breeding sites, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 2000, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 323–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peters, R.H. and De Bernardi, R., Daphnia, Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol., 1987, vol. 45, p. 502.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rey, D., Long, A., Pauton, M.P., et al., Comparative histopathology of some Diptera and Crustacea of aquatic alpine ecosystems after treatment with Bacillus thuringiens var. israelensis, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 2004, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zanuncio, J.C., Jusselino-Filho, P., Ribeiro, R., et al., Hormetic responses of a stinkbug predator to sublethal doses of pyrethroid, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2011, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 608–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Papanin Institute of Biology of Inland WatersRussian Academy of ScienceBorok, Nekouzskii raion, Yaroslavl oblastRussia

Personalised recommendations