Skip to main content
Log in

Three-parameter Regularization Algorithm for Pseudo-solution of Non-compatible Systems

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work is devoted to some generalization of the regularization method for ill-conditioned and degenerate systems of linear algebraic equations with symmetric non-negative definite matrices. For regularization, a shift of matrix is used with the unit operator multiplied by a small positive parameter. In previous paper of authors, two variants of linear combinations of regularized solutions with different parameters are considered: for consistent and for inconsistent systems. In the first case, the choice of weights for a linear combination increases order of accuracy in comparison with the one-parameter regularization. In the second case, a special choice of weights allows one to find an approximate normal pseudo-solution without orthogonalization of the right-hand side to the matrix kernel. In present paper we combine both approach by usage of three-parameter linear combination to suppress a contribution of operator kernel and to increase order of accuracy for normal pseudo-solution. A computational experiment illustrates the theoretical result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

REFERENCES

  1. J. D. Riley, ‘‘Solving systems of linear equations with a positive definite symmetric but possibly ill-conditioned matrix,’’ Math. Tables Aids Comput. 9, 96–101 (1956).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. V. N. Fadeeva, ‘‘Shift for systems with ill-conditioned matrices,’’ Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 5, 907–911 (1965).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. B. Bakushinsky, ‘‘Some properties of regularizing algorithms,’’ Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 8, 426–428 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Morozov, ‘‘Regularization under high noise conditions,’’ Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 36, 13–21 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. L. Ageev and V. V. Vasin, ‘‘On the convergence of the generalized residual method and its discrete approximations,’’ Mat. Zap. Ural. Univ. 11 (4), 3–18 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. V. Vasin, ‘‘Optimality in order of the regularization method for nonlinear operator equations,’’ Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 17, 847–858 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. M. Lavrent’ev, ‘‘On improving the accuracy of solving a system of linear equations,’’ Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 92, 885–886 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. M. Lavrent’ev, ‘‘On integral equations of the first kind,’’ Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 127, 31–33 (1959).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. V. P. Maslov, ‘‘Existence of a solution to an ill-posed problem of an equivalently regularized process,’’ Usp. Mat. Nauk 23, 183–184 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. N. Tikhonov and V. Ya. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (Nauka, Moscow, 1979; Halsted, New York, 1977).

  11. E. E. Tyrtyshnikov, ‘‘Correct statement of the problem of solving systems of linear algebraic equations,’’ Mat. Sb. 213(10) (2022).

  12. S. I. Kabanikhin, Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems (Sib. Nauch. Izdat., Novosibirsk, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. B. Nazimov, V. A. Morozov, E. M. Mukhamadiev, and M. Mullodzanov, Method of Regularization by Shifting (Volog. Tech. Univ., Vologda, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Shaydurov, S. Kabanikhin, and V. Petrakova, ‘‘Two algorithms for refinement of approximate solutions in the regularization method,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 44, 437–445 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. G. I. Marchuk and V. V. Shaidurov, Improving the Accuracy of Solutions to Difference Schemes (Nauka, Moscow, 1979; Springer, Heidelberg, 1983).

  16. R. Penrose, ‘‘On best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations,’’ Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 52, 17–19 (1956).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. A. Samarskii and V. B. Andreev, Finite Difference Methods for Elliptic Equations (Nauka, Moscow, 1976; Science Press, Beijing, 1984).

  18. L. F. Richardson, ‘‘The deferred approach to the limit. Single lattice,’’ Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 226, 299–349 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Krasnoyarsk Mathematical Center, funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation as part of activities for the creation and development of regional scientific and educational mathematics centers (Agreement 075-02-2023-912).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. Shaydurov or V. Petrakova.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

(Submitted by A. V. Lapin)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaydurov, V., Petrakova, V. Three-parameter Regularization Algorithm for Pseudo-solution of Non-compatible Systems. Lobachevskii J Math 45, 328–335 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080224010487

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080224010487

Keywords:

Navigation