Skip to main content
Log in

A Modified Mixture Model-Based Clustering Algorithm for Resolving the Problem of Mixed Pixels Available in Satellite Imagery

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we present the model-based clustering in order to overcome the problem of mixed pixels for satellite imagery. The mixed pixel problem is one of the major reasons that affect the classification accuracy in the classification of remotely sensed images. Mixed pixels are usually the prime reason for degrading the success in image classification and object recognition. A modified model-based clustering algorithm is developed by modifying membership function and compared with the traditional model-based clustering algorithm in terms of classification error and brier score. Results on classification of satellite images reveal that the suggestive algorithms are robust and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

REFERENCES

  1. J. Banfield and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering,’’ Biometrics 49, 803–821 (1993).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Campbell, C. Fraley, D. Stanford, F. Murtagh, and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Model-based methods for textile fault detection,’’ Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 10, 339–346 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Campbell, C. Fraley, D. Stanford, F. Murtagh, and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Linear flaw detection in woven textiles using model-based clustering,’’ Pattern Recogn. Lett. 18, 1539–1548 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Dasgupta and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Detecting features in spatial point processes with clutter via model-based clustering,’’ J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93, 294–302 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin, ‘‘Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,’’ J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 39, 1–38 (1977).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Fraley and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model based analysis,’’ Comput. J. 41, 578–588 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Fraley and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘MCLUST: Software for model-based cluster analysis,’’ J. Classific. 16, 297–306 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Fraley and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation,’’ J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97 (458), 611–631 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. P. Friedman and J. Rubin, ‘‘On some invariant criteria for group ing data,’’ J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62, 1159–1178 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani, ‘‘Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures,’’ J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 58, 155–176 (1996).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A. K. Jain and R. C. Dubes, Algorithms for Clustering Data (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. A. Johnson and D. W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 6th ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Kaufman and P. Rousseeuw, Finding Groups in Data – An Introduction to Cluster Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. J. McLachlan, Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition (Wiley, New York, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. G. J. Mclachlan and K. E. Basford, Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. J. Mclachlan and T. Krishnan, The EM Algorithm and Extensions (Wiley, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. J. Mclachlan, S. Ng, G. Galloway, and D. Wang, ‘‘Clustering of magnetic resonance images,’’ in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Statistical Computing Section, Alexandria, Virginia (1996), pp. 12–17.

  18. G. J. Mclachlan and D. Peel, Finite Mixture Models (Wiley, New York, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. G. J. Mclachlan, D. Peel, K. Basford, and P. Adams, ‘‘The EMMIX software for the fitting of mixtures of normal and T-components,’’ J. Stat. Software 4 (2), 1–14 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. D. McNicholas and T. B. Murphy, ‘‘Model-based clustering of microarray expression data via latent Gaussian mixture models,’’ Bioinformatics 26, 2705–2712 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Mukherjee, E. Feigelson, G. Babu, F. Murtagh, C. Fraley, and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Three types of gamma ray bursts,’’ Astrophys. J. 508, 314–327 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. J. Scott and M. J. Symons, ‘‘Clustering methods based on like lihood ratio criteria,’’ Biometrics 27, 387–397 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Stanford and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Approximate Bayes factors for image segmentation: The Pseudo Likelihood Information Criterion (PLIC),’’ IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 24, 1517–1520 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Wang and A. E. Raftery, ‘‘Nearest Neighbor Variance Estimation (NNVE): Robust covariance estimation via nearest neighbor cleaning (with discussion),’’ J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97, 994–1019 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Wehrens, A. Simonetti, and L. M. C. Buydens, ‘‘Mixture modelling of medical magnetic resonance data,’’ J. Chemometrics 16, 1–10 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Yeung, C. Fraley, A. Murua, A. E. Raftery, and W. Ruzzo, ‘‘Model based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data,’’ Bioinformatics 17, 977–987 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research of the last listed author was performed under the development program of Volga Region Mathematical Center (agreement no. 075-02-2023-944).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irfan Ali.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

(Submitted by A. M. Elizarov)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sherwani, A.R., Ali, Q.M., Ali, I. et al. A Modified Mixture Model-Based Clustering Algorithm for Resolving the Problem of Mixed Pixels Available in Satellite Imagery. Lobachevskii J Math 44, 4824–4838 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S199508022311029X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S199508022311029X

Keywords:

Navigation