Skip to main content
Log in

Multiscale Approach for Modeling Multiphase Fluid Flows in Installations for Reprocessing of Natural Gas

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work is devoted to the development of a multiscale approach for modeling multiphase liquid and gas flows in a porous medium. The problem of reprocessing organic fuels, including natural gas, has been chosen as an application. One of the important stages of such reprocessing is the purification of hydrocarbon raw materials from accompanying impurities (metal particles, solid organic compounds, etc.) in chemisorbers. To model treatment processes in such technical systems, a multiscale mathematical model is proposed that combines macroscopic and microscopic descriptions of multiphase fluid flows in a treatment system. The first part of the model refers to macroscopic scales and includes equations of gas and/or hydrodynamics for describing the multiphase multicomponent fluid flows, supplemented by convection-diffusion-reaction (CDR) equations for impurity concentrations. The second part of the model refers to microscopic scales and describes the processes in the boundary layers of the treatment system and in the pores. It is based on the equations of molecular dynamics and analytical chemistry. Both parts are conjugated within the method of splitting by physical processes. The work considers the problem of natural gas purification from hydrogen sulfide by passing contaminated fluid through a porous material. In it, the first part of the model is represented by quasistationary Navier–Stokes equations averaged over the volume. For their numerical implementation, an implicit grid algorithm implemented by Newton’s method is proposed. The CDR equations are solved according to an implicit time scheme. The second part of the model is represented by the dependencies of the permeability tensor components on porosity and impurity concentrations. The separate parts of the model have been calibrated in numerical experiments. In particular, model calculations of flows in a scrubber with a porous plug have been carried out. The calculations are performed using the FEniCS computing platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. W. Strauss, Industrial Gas Cleaning (Pergamon, Oxford, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. A. Akhmetov, Physical and Chemical Technology of Deep Processing of Oil and Gas (UGNTU, Ufa, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. K. Manovyan, Technology of Primary Oil and Natural Gas Processing (Khimiya, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. V. Busygina and I. G. Busygin, Natural Gas and Gas Condensate Processing Technology (Gazprompechat, Orenburg, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. G. Speight, Encyclopedia of Hydrocarbon Fuel Science and Technology (Wiley, New York, 2012), Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. G. Speight, Encyclopedia of Hydrocarbon Fuel Science and Technology (Wiley, New York, 2012), Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Nag, Distillation and Hydrocarbon Processing Practices (PennWell Corp, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. G. Speight, Handbook of Petrochemical Processes (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2019).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. M. L. Danzig, E. V. Turcheninova, G. A. Danzig, V. S. Sobolevsky, V. N. Menshov, V. V. Zhavoronkov, T. A. Kondrashchenko, and Z. E. Yermina, ‘‘Development of an industrial technology for the production of active zinc oxide for the production of desulfurization masses,’’ Khim. Prom-st’ 8, 30–32 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. G. Ikonnikov, L. I. Titelman, G. A. Danzig, A. V. Obysov, and M. L. Danzig, ‘‘Experience in the preparation and industrial operation of molded zinc oxide absorbers for sulfur compounds,’’ Khim. Prom-st’ 9, 25–28 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Yumura and E. Furimsky, ‘‘Comparison of CaO, ZnO and Fe\({}_{2}\)O\({}_{3}\) as H\({}_{2}\)S adsorbent at high temperatures,’’ Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 24, 1165–1168 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. A. Fenouil, G. P. Towler, and S. Linn, ‘‘Removal of H\({}_{2}\)S from coal gas using limestone: Kinetic considerations,’’ Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33, 265–272 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. I. Lazarev, ‘‘Methods for purifying natural gas from hydrogen sulfide with solid sorbents,’’ Nauch. Tekh. Asp. Zashch. Okruzh. Sredy 4, 84–113 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. L. Hartmann, ‘‘Effect of sulphur removal catalyst granules properties on the commercial-scale bed macrokinetics,’’ Chem. Eng. J. 107, 39–43 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. L. Hartmann, ‘‘Gas–solid reaction modeling as applied to the fine desulfurization of gaseous feedstocks,’’ Chem. Eng. J. 134, 190–194 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Berlin, V. G. Gorechenkov, and V. P. Kapralov, Qualified Primary Processing of Petroleum and Natural Hydrocarbon Gases (Sov. Kuban, Krasnodar, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. V. Afanasyev, A. A. Sadovnikov, V. L. Hartmann, A. V. Obysov, and A. V. Dulnev, Industrial Catalysis in Gas Chemistry (RAS SamSC, Samara, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. O. Podryga, S. V. Polyakov, and N. I. Tarasov, ‘‘Developing of multiscale approach to HPC-simulation of multiphase fluid flows,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 42, 2623–2633 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. B. N. Chetverushkin, Kinetic Schemes and Quasi-Gas Dynamic System of Equations (CIMNE, Barcelona, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. G. Elizarova, Quasi-Gas Dynamic Equations (Springer, Berlin, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Whitaker, The Method of Volume Averaging (Springer Science, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. D. A. Nield and A. Bejan, Convection in Porous Media (Springer Int., Cham, Switzerland, 2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. FEniCS Project. https://fenicsproject.org/. Accessed 2022.

  24. H. P. G. Darcy, Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon (Victor Dalmont Editeur, Paris, France, 1856).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. C. Brinkman, ‘‘A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles,’’ Appl. Sci. Res. A 1, 2–34 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Forchheimer, ‘‘Wasserbewegung durch Boden,’’ Zeitschr. Verein. Deutsch. Ingen. 45, 1782–1788 (1901).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. T. Hsu and P. Cheng, ‘‘Thermal dispersion in a porous medium,’’ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 33, 1587–1597 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Nithiarasu, K. N. Seetharamu, and T. Sundararajan, ‘‘Natural convective heat transfer in a fluid saturated variable porosity medium,’’ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 40, 3955–3967 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Tamayol and M. Bahrami, ‘‘In-plane gas permeability of proton exchange membrane fuel cell gas diffusion layers,’’ J. Power Sources 196, 3559–3564 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Eymard, T. R. Gallouet, and R. Herbin, ‘‘The finite volume method,’’ in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Ed. by P. G. Ciarlet and J. L. Lions (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000), Vol. 7, pp. 713–1020.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Gmsh. https://gmsh.info/. Accessed 2022.

  32. ParaView. https://www.paraview.org/. Accessed 2022.

  33. TecPlot. https://www.tecplot.com/. Accessed 2022.

  34. V. John, Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems (Springer Int., Cham, Switzerland, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. C. T. Kelley, Solving Nonlinear Equations with Newton’s Method (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and National Science Foundation of Bulgaria (project no. 20-51-18004-Bolg_a). The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-31-90140_aspiranty).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. O. Podryga, A. G. Churbanov, N. I. Tarasov, S. V. Polyakov, M. A. Trapeznikova or N. G. Churbanova.

Additional information

(Submitted by A. B. Muravnik)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Podryga, V.O., Churbanov, A.G., Tarasov, N.I. et al. Multiscale Approach for Modeling Multiphase Fluid Flows in Installations for Reprocessing of Natural Gas. Lobachevskii J Math 43, 1560–1571 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222090219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222090219

Keywords:

Navigation