Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ontological Approach: Knowledge Representation and Knowledge Extraction

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence algorithms for data analysis, characteristics, and metrics of scientific information resources are considered. In this paper, we discuss how metrics are related to assessment of scientific publication components and whether metrics are related to fundamental knowledge. It was noted that the characteristics of professional scientific activity are evaluated on the basis of metrics that are not related to the knowledge characteristics. The problem of knowledge extraction was studied on the basis of data verification by means of logical evidence–based schemes specified in the knowledge ontology. Properties of the modern stage of development of the knowledge space as a resource of artificial intelligence were noted. The transformation of artificial intelligence tasks into a new digital age was also analyzed. The insufficient use of artificial intelligence and machine learning methods in scientific bibliographic databases was emphasized, where quantitative scientometric indicators prevailed. Examples of ontological presentation of data and knowledge extraction are discussed and the special role of ontological approach to data structuring and knowledge extraction is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://kst.hockemeyer.at/kst-bib.html.

  2. https://www.antiplagiat.ru/.

  3. http://e-libmeta.ru/.

  4. https://teacode.com/online/udc.

  5. https://classinform.ru/bbk.html.

  6. http://grnti.ru.

  7. http://msc2010.org/Default.html.

  8. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/.

REFERENCES

  1. Indicators for each Publication are Calculated: Research Interest, Citations, Recommendations, Reads. https://www.researchgate.net. Accessed 2020.

  2. For Candidates for Elections to RAS 2019 the Indicators are Calculated: The Number of Publications, Citations Included in the Core of RSCI, Hirsch Index on the Core of RSCI. https://www.elibrary.ru/kand_ras_2019.asp. Accessed 2020.

  3. My Reports, My Page. https://istina.msu.ru/home/reports. Accessed 2020.

  4. Section Personalities, Statistics Publications and Views in MathSciNet, in zbMATH, in Web of Science, in Scopus. http://www.mathnet. ru. Accessed 2020.

  5. Web of Science, Statistics and Graphics. https://publons.com/researcher. Accessed 2020.

  6. Scopus Statistics and Graphics. https://www.scopus.com. Accessed 2020.

  7. Scimago Journal and Country Rank. https://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed 2020.

  8. T. A. Gavrilova and V. F. Horoshevskij, Knowledge Bases of Intelligent Systems (Piter, St. Petersburg, 2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. How Google Search Algorithms Work. https://www.google.com/search/howsearchworks/algorithms. Accessed 2020.

  10. The Search We Do Together. https://yandex.ru/blog/company/korolev. Accessed 2020.

  11. Research-Management in Management-Research, RMIMR. https://rmimr.wordpress.com/2011/01/02. Accessed 2020.

  12. Tetra: A Powerful, Easy-to-Use Multi-Criteria Decision and Evaluation Tool. http://scientificmetrics.com. Accessed 2020.

  13. E. Garfield, ‘‘Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas,’’ Int. J. Epidemiol. 35, 1123–1127 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Social Sciences Citation Index. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Sciences_Citation_Index. Accessed 2020.

  15. Cross-National Comparisons of R&D Performance. https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/research-and-development-u-s-trends-and-international-comparisons/cross-national-comparisons-of-r-d-performance. Accessed 2020.

  16. J. McCarthy, ‘‘Artificial intelligence, logic and formalizing common sense,’’ (1990). http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/ailogic. Accessed 2020.

  17. D. A. Pospelov, ‘‘Knowledge representation. Systems analysis experience,’’ Sist. Issled. Metodol. Probl. 17, 83–102 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, Proceedings, Vol. 11015 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin, 2018). https://publications.sba-research.org/publications/201808-Aholzinger-Machine-Learning-and-Knowledge-Extraction.pdf.

  19. M. Eremeev and K. Vorontsov, ‘‘Lexical quantile-based text complexity measure,’’ in RANLP-2019 Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Varna, Bulgaria, 2019, pp. 270–275.

  20. K. W. Boyack, ‘‘Thesaurus–based methods for mapping contents of publication sets,’’ Scientometrics 111, 1141–1155 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu. A. Shrejder, ‘‘Thesaurus-based methods for mapping contents of publication sets,’’ Nauch.-Tekh. Inform. 2, 21–24 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scientific Visualization: The Visual Extraction of Knowledge from Data, Ed. by G.-P. Bonneau, Th. Ertl, and G. M. Nielson, Series Mathematics and Visualization (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006).

  23. N. G. Zagoruiko, Cognitive Data Mining (GEO, Novosibirsk, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, New York, 2006).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. D. V. Mikhaylov and G. M. Emelyanov, ‘‘Estimation of the closeness to a semantic pattern of a topical text without construction of periphrases,’’ Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 29, 647–653 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Pitts, ‘‘The linear theory of neuron networks: The static problem,’’ Bull. Math. Biophys. 4, 169–75 (1942).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. D. A. Pospelov, Situational Control: Theory and Practice (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. A. Pospelov, ‘‘About ’human’ reasoning in intelligent systems,’’ in Cybernetics. Reasoning Logic and its Modeling (Nauch. Sovet. Kompl. Probl. Kibernetika AN SSSR, Moscow, 1983), pp. 5–37 [in Russian].

  29. V. A. Shuster, ‘‘Subjective assessments of verbal and frame descriptions of actions,’’ in Cybernetics. Reasoning Logic and Its Modeling (Nauch. Sovet. Kompl. Probl. Kibernetika AN SSSR, Moscow, 1983), pp. 103–136 [in Russian].

  30. Semantic Web. https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb. Accessed 2020.

  31. J. Hendler, ‘‘Avoiding another AI winter,’’ IEEE Intell. Syst. 23 (2), 2–4 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Goebel et al., ‘‘Explainable AI: The new 42?,’’ Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 11015 (2), 2–4 (2008) https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-99740-7_21. Accessed 2020.

  33. J. E. Hirsch, ‘‘An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output,’’ Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 16569–16573 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. N. A. Slashcheva, ‘‘Scientometric research in the library (on the example of the Central Library of the PSC RAS),’’ Naukovedenie 3, 147–154 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  35. N. A. Slashcheva and Yu. V. Mokhnacheva, ‘‘Electronic information in scientometric research,’’ NTI, Ser. 1: Org. Metodika Inform. raboty 5, 21–27 (2003).

  36. V. V. Pislyakov, ‘‘Evaluation of scientific knowledge based on citation indexes,’’ Sotsiol. Zh., No. 1, 128–140 (2007). http://www.socjournal.ru/article/682?print=yes.

  37. C. Nikolaou et al., ‘‘Foundations of ontology-based data access under bag semantics,’’ Artif. Intell. 274, 91–132 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. SHOE. http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE. Accessed 2020.

  39. AllegroGraph. https://allegrograph.com/the-enterprise-knowledge-graph. Accessed 2020.

  40. DB-Engines. https://db-engines.com/en/ranking. Accessed 2020.

  41. Mathematical Encyclopedy, Ed. I. M. Vinogradov (Sov. Entsiklopediya, Moscow, 1979), Vol. 2 [in Russian]. https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/enc_mathematics. Accessed 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Encyclopedy World. http://www.encyclopedia.ru. Accessed 2020.

  43. Wikipedia. http://www.wikipedia.org. Accessed 2020.

  44. A. M. Elizarov et al., ‘‘Mathematical knowledge ontologies and recommender systems for collections of documents in physics and mathematics,’’ Dokl. Math. 93, 231–233 (2016) [in Russian].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. O. M. Ataeva, V. A. Serebryakov, and N. P. Tuchkova, ‘‘Query expansion method application for searching in mathematical subject domains,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 40 (7), 876–886 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. O. M. Ataeva, V. A. Serebryakov, and N. P. Tuchkova, ‘‘Mathematical physics branches: Identifying mixed type equations,’’ CEUR Workshop Proc. 2543, 38–48 (2020).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. A. Margaret, ‘‘Boden creativity and artificial intelligence,’’ Artif. Intell. 103, 347–356 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. V. V. Kostin, ‘‘An overview of semantic models describing scientific publications and research activities,’’ in Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections, Proceedings of the 16th All-Russia Conference RCDL-2014, Dubna, October 13–16, 2014 (2014), pp. 131–136.

  49. M. V. Kulagin and A. S. Lopatenko, ‘‘Scientific information systems and electronic libraries. Need for integration,’’ in Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections, Proceedings of the All-Russia Conference RCDL-2001 (2001), pp. 14–19.

  50. A. M. Fedotov and Yu. I. Shokin, ‘‘Electronic library of Siberian Branch of RAS,’’ Inform. Ob-vo 2, 22–31 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. R. Kogalovskij, ‘‘Metadata, their properties, functions, classification and presentation means,’’ in Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections, Proceedings of the All-Russia Conference RCDL-2012 (2012). http://elib.ict.nsc.ru/jspui/bitstream/ICT/1175/1/kogalovsky-meta.pdf. Accessed 2020.

  52. M. M. K. Hlava, ‘‘The taxobook: History, theories, and concepts of knowledge organization, part 1 of a 3-part series,’’ in Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services (Morgan Claypool, 2014), Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–80.

  53. V. L. Obukhov, philosophy and Methodology of Knowledge, The School-Book (SPBGU, St. Petersburg, 2003) [in Russian].

  54. A. Yu. Ahlyostin, N. A. Lavrent’ev, and A. Z. Fazliev, ‘‘Systematization of scientific graphic resources on molecular spectroscopy,’’ in Scientific service on the Internet: Proceedings of the 19th All-Russia Conference6 (3), 34–42 (2017). http://keldysh.ru/abrau/2017/39.pdf. https://doi.org/10.20948/abrau-2017-39

  55. A. Yu. Ahlyostin, N. A. Lavrent’ev, and A. Z. Fazliev, ‘‘Integration of knowledge management process into digital library system: A theoretical perspective,’’ Library Rev. 58, 372–386 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. O. A. Lavryonova and V. V. Pavlov, ‘‘Library and bibliographic classification as a traditional system of organizing knowledge in the environment of open connected data,’’ Nauch. Tekh. Bibliot. 4, 44–60 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  57. C. Lange et al., ‘‘Reimplementing the mathematics subject classification (MSC) as a linked open dataset,’’ in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 2012, pp. 458–462.

  58. M. Scannapieco, P. Missier, and C. Batini, ‘‘Data quality at a glance,’’ Datenbank-Spektrum 14, 6–14 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  59. R. Singh and K. Singh, ‘‘A descriptive classification of causes of data quality problems in data warehousing,’’ Int. J.Comput. Sci. Issues 7 (3) (2), 41–50 (2010).

  60. O. M. Ataeva, ‘‘LibMeta Semantic Library Information Model,’’ Program. Produkty Sist. 4, 36–44 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by budget topics of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and particular by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, projects Nos. 18-00-00297komfi, 20-07-00324.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Research Center ’’Computer Sciences and Control’’, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333, Moscow, Russia

    O. M. Ataeva, V. A. Serebryakov & N. P. Tuchkova

Authors
  1. O. M. Ataeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. A. Serebryakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. P. Tuchkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to O. M. Ataeva, V. A. Serebryakov or N. P. Tuchkova.

Additional information

(Submitted by A. M. Elizarov)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ataeva, O.M., Serebryakov, V.A. & Tuchkova, N.P. Ontological Approach: Knowledge Representation and Knowledge Extraction. Lobachevskii J Math 41, 1938–1948 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080220100030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080220100030

Keywords:

Search

Navigation