Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Groundwater Flow in Unconfined Conditions: Numerical Model and Solvers’ Efficiency

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mathematical model for variably saturated flow in unconfined conditions is presented. The model is based on pseudo-unsaturated approach using Richards equation with piecewise linear dependencies between hydraulic head, water content and relative permeability. It is implemented in GeRa (Geomigration of Radionuclides) software package, which is designed for modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport in porous media and uses finite volume methods on unstructured grids. We consider two nonlinear solvers for nonlinear equations arising from discretization of the Richards equation, namely Newton and Picard methods. A special method for correction of hydraulic head values within the iterations of nonlinear solvers is proposed. The developed numerical techniques are applied to two test cases: dam seepage and real-world groundwater flow problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Richards, “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums,” J. Appl. Phys. 1, 318–333 (1931).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. I. V. Kapyrin, V. A. Ivanov, G. V. Kopytov, and S. S. Utkin, “Integral code GeRa for RAW disposal safety validation,” Gorn. Zh., No. 10, 44–50 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. J. Diersch, FEFLOW: Finite Element Modeling of Flow, Mass and Heat Transport in Porous and Fractured Media (Springer, New York, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Šimůnek and M. T. van Genuchten, “Modeling nonequilibrium flow and transport processes using HYDRUS,” Vadose Zone J. 7, 782–797 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. W. Harbaugh, E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald, “MODFLOW-2000, The U. S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process,” Open-file Report No. 92 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2000), p.134.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. V. Kapyrin, V. V. Suskin, A. V. Rastorguev, and K.D. Nikitin, “Verification of unsaturated flow and transport in vadose zone models using the computational code GeRa,” Vopr. At. Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Mat. Model. Fiz. Protsess., No. 1, 60–75 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Plenkin, A. Y. Chernyshenko, V. N. Chugunov, and I. V. Kapyrin, “Adaptive unstructured mesh generation methods for hydrogeological problems,” Vychisl. Metody Programm. 16, 518–533 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Aavatsmark, “Interpretation of a two-point flux stencil for skew parallelogram grids,” Comput. Geosci. 11, 199–206 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Aavatsmark, T. Barkve, O. Boe, and T. Mannseth, “Discretization on unstructured grids for inhomogeneous, anizotropic media. Part I: Derivation of the methods,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19, 1700–1716 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Danilov and Yu. Vassilevski, “A monotone nonlinear finite volume method for diffusion equations on conformal polyhedral meshes,” Russ. J. Numer. Anal.Math. Model. 24, 207–227 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Celia and E. Bouloutas, “A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation,” Water Resourses Res. 26, 1483–1496 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. L. Huntington and R. G. Niswonger, “Role of surface-water and groundwater interactions on projected summertime streamflow in snow dominated regions: An integrated modeling approach,” Water Resources Res. 48 (11) (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. I. Polubarinova-Kochina, Theory of GroundWater Movement (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2015).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation. https://doi.org/www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/.

  15. H. J. G. Diersch, “Treatment of free surfaces in 2D and 3D groundwater modeling,” Math. Geol. 2, 17–43 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. J. G. Diersch, FEFLOW-White Papers (WASY, Berlin, 2002), Vol. 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Anuprienko.

Additional information

Submitted by A. V. Lapin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anuprienko, D.V., Kapyrin, I.V. Modeling Groundwater Flow in Unconfined Conditions: Numerical Model and Solvers’ Efficiency. Lobachevskii J Math 39, 867–873 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080218070053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080218070053

Keywords and phrases

Navigation