Abstract
A mathematical model for variably saturated flow in unconfined conditions is presented. The model is based on pseudo-unsaturated approach using Richards equation with piecewise linear dependencies between hydraulic head, water content and relative permeability. It is implemented in GeRa (Geomigration of Radionuclides) software package, which is designed for modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport in porous media and uses finite volume methods on unstructured grids. We consider two nonlinear solvers for nonlinear equations arising from discretization of the Richards equation, namely Newton and Picard methods. A special method for correction of hydraulic head values within the iterations of nonlinear solvers is proposed. The developed numerical techniques are applied to two test cases: dam seepage and real-world groundwater flow problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Richards, “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums,” J. Appl. Phys. 1, 318–333 (1931).
I. V. Kapyrin, V. A. Ivanov, G. V. Kopytov, and S. S. Utkin, “Integral code GeRa for RAW disposal safety validation,” Gorn. Zh., No. 10, 44–50 (2015).
H. J. Diersch, FEFLOW: Finite Element Modeling of Flow, Mass and Heat Transport in Porous and Fractured Media (Springer, New York, 2013).
J. Šimůnek and M. T. van Genuchten, “Modeling nonequilibrium flow and transport processes using HYDRUS,” Vadose Zone J. 7, 782–797 (2008).
A. W. Harbaugh, E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald, “MODFLOW-2000, The U. S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process,” Open-file Report No. 92 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2000), p.134.
I. V. Kapyrin, V. V. Suskin, A. V. Rastorguev, and K.D. Nikitin, “Verification of unsaturated flow and transport in vadose zone models using the computational code GeRa,” Vopr. At. Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Mat. Model. Fiz. Protsess., No. 1, 60–75 (2017).
A. V. Plenkin, A. Y. Chernyshenko, V. N. Chugunov, and I. V. Kapyrin, “Adaptive unstructured mesh generation methods for hydrogeological problems,” Vychisl. Metody Programm. 16, 518–533 (2015).
I. Aavatsmark, “Interpretation of a two-point flux stencil for skew parallelogram grids,” Comput. Geosci. 11, 199–206 (2007).
I. Aavatsmark, T. Barkve, O. Boe, and T. Mannseth, “Discretization on unstructured grids for inhomogeneous, anizotropic media. Part I: Derivation of the methods,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19, 1700–1716 (1998).
A. Danilov and Yu. Vassilevski, “A monotone nonlinear finite volume method for diffusion equations on conformal polyhedral meshes,” Russ. J. Numer. Anal.Math. Model. 24, 207–227 (2009).
M. Celia and E. Bouloutas, “A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation,” Water Resourses Res. 26, 1483–1496 (1990).
J. L. Huntington and R. G. Niswonger, “Role of surface-water and groundwater interactions on projected summertime streamflow in snow dominated regions: An integrated modeling approach,” Water Resources Res. 48 (11) (2012).
P. I. Polubarinova-Kochina, Theory of GroundWater Movement (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2015).
Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation. https://doi.org/www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/.
H. J. G. Diersch, “Treatment of free surfaces in 2D and 3D groundwater modeling,” Math. Geol. 2, 17–43 (1998).
H. J. G. Diersch, FEFLOW-White Papers (WASY, Berlin, 2002), Vol. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Submitted by A. V. Lapin
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anuprienko, D.V., Kapyrin, I.V. Modeling Groundwater Flow in Unconfined Conditions: Numerical Model and Solvers’ Efficiency. Lobachevskii J Math 39, 867–873 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080218070053
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080218070053