Skip to main content
Log in

Study of a Sample of Frankincense from Vetchany Gorod of Ancient Vladimir

  • NATURAL SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN STUDYING CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES
  • Published:
Nanotechnologies in Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the results of research performed at the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute on a sample of frankincense found in 1993 during excavations in the eastern part of the historic core of the city of Vladimir known as Vetchany Gorod (Decayed Town), currently part of the collection of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Culture State Vladimir-Suzdal Historical, Architectural, and Art Museum-Reserve. Identification of bioactive substances of frankincense in the museum sample by European Pharmacopoeia methods did not detect the presence of boswellic acids and their derivatives, which are characteristic of frankincense. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) examination of the fragment of museum frankincense detected compounds present in modern frankincense, amyrenones and amyrins, and thermal decomposition products but not the primary biomarkers—boswellic acids and their derivatives. GC/MS analysis of a sample of modern frankincense after thermal treatment that simulated the process of censing as done in church services showed the absence of boswellic acids and their derivatives. The remains left after the thermal treatment were found to contain more stable chemical compounds of frankincense as well as products of its thermal decomposition. A hexane extract of the residue of the studied sample was found to contain odd carbon numbered n-alkanes, which are biomarkers of beeswax. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the studied museum sample is a mixture of beeswax and incense remains left in a censer after a church service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Lipatov, E. Yu. Mednikova, A. E. Musin, and A. A. Peskova, Christian Iconography of the East and West in the Monuments of Material Culture of Ancient Russia and Byzantium: In Memory of Tatyana Chukova (Peterb. Vostokovedenie, St. Petersburg, 2006) [in Russian].

  2. E. Yu. Mednikova, A. A. Lipatov, and V. E. Kulikov, Relikviya, No. 2, 16 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Mirzoyan, Byzantium and Byzantine Traditions (Gos. Ermitazh, St. Petersburg, 1996) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. E. Musin, Eastern Christian Relics (Progress–Tradi-tsiya, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. G. Khrushkova, Early Christian Monuments of the Eastern Black Sea Coast. IV–VII Centuries (Nauka, Moscow, 2002), p. 363 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. E. Zharnov and V. I. Zharnova, Old Russian Art. Byzantium and Ancient Russia. To the 100th Anniversary of Andrei Nikolaevich Grabar (1896–1990), Collection of Articles (Dmitrii Bulanin, St. Petersburg, 1999), p. 451 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Lipatov, E. Yu. Mednikova, A. E. Musin, and A. A. Peskova, Christian Iconography of the East and West in the Monuments of Material Culture of Ancient Russia and Byzantium (Peterb. Vostokoved., St. Petersburg, 2006), p. 291 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. A. Makarov, E. A. Greshnikov, I. E. Zaitseva, et al., Kratk. Soobshch. Inst. Arkheol., No. 258, 25 (2020).

  9. J. J. Clarkson, M. W. Chase, and M. M. Harley, Kew Bull., 183 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/4110826

  10. A. O. Tucker, Econ. Bot. 40, 425 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Archier and C. Vieillescazes, Analus 28, 233 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1051/analusis:2000112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Thulin and A. M. Warfa, Kew Bull., 487 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2307/4110063

  13. J. Duperon, Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vegetales, Le Botaniste 16, 185 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. J. W. Coppen, Soft resins and balsams, in Non-Wood Forest Products 6: Gums, Resins and Latexes of Plant Origin (FAO, Rome, 1995), pp. 81–112.

  15. The US Pharmacopeial Convention, US Pharmacopoeia 38-National Formulary 33 (United Book Press, Baltimore, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Eur. Pharmacopoeia Commission, European Pharmacopoeia, 8.0 ed. (Eur. Directorate for the Quality Control of Med. Press, Strasbourg, 2008), Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Indian Pharmacopoeia (Natl. Inst. Sci. Commun. Inform. Resources Press, New Delhi, 2010), Vol. 3.

  18. The National Pharmacopoeia Committee, Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, 2010), Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Paul, G. Bruning, J. Bergmann, and J. Jauch, Phytochem. Anal. 23, 189 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.1341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Mathe, G. Culioli, P. Archier, and C. Vieillescazes, J. Chromatogr., A 1023, 277 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.016

  21. R. P. Evershed, P. F. van Bergen, T. M. Peakman, et al., Nature (London, U.K.) 390, 667 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/37741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. F. van Bergen, T. M. Peakman, E. C. Leigh-Firbank, and R. P. Evershed, Tetrahedron Lett. 38, 8409 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(97)10234-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Connan, C. Joliot, and C. Mathe, J. His. Arch. Anthropol. Sci. 3, 696 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15406/jhaas.2018.03.00153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to I.V. Kurnikova, head of conservation for the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Culture State Vladimir–Suzdal Historical, Architectural, and Art Museum-Reserve, for providing the museum sample for study and to A.V. Voroshilov, employee of the Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, for his help with acquisition and collection of samples of modern frankincense and resin.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project nos. 17-29-04100 and 17-29-04129 ofi_m.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Pozhidaev.

Additional information

Translated by A. Ovchinnikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pozhidaev, V.M., Zaitseva, I.E., Kamaev, A.V. et al. Study of a Sample of Frankincense from Vetchany Gorod of Ancient Vladimir. Nanotechnol Russia 15, 639–646 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078020050122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078020050122

Navigation