Abstract
Thermodynamic modeling of the solubility of pharmaceuticals in supercritical fluids is necessary to optimize processes of extraction, purification, micronization, etc. By the example of the ternary systems CO2–ethanol–acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and CO2–dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)–salbutamol sulfate, the work showed that such modeling can be made using simplified models based on the Peng–Robinson cubic equation of state. This equation was used to describe phase equilibria in the CO2–ethanol binary system at p = 0.1–12 MPa and T = 290–345 K, and the CO2–DMSO binary system at p = 0.5–18 MPa and T = 275–50 K. In the case of the ternary systems, data on the solubility of pharmaceuticals in mixed solvents were successfully approximated. ASA was characterized using the available experimental data at p = 7.5–35 MPa, T = 298–328 K, and x(C2H5OH) = 0 and 3 mol %. The solubility of salbutamol sulfate in a mixture of CO2 and DMSO was measured visually in a thermostated cell of constant volume at p = 8.6–21.7 MPa and T = 313–323 K. Although the constructed models describe phase equilibria, they do not agree with fluid density data, especially for the compositions rich in polar components. However, this does not prevent the cubic equations of state from using to describe the solubility of pharmaceuticals in fluid systems.
Notes
Hereinafter, all figures are in the color insert.
REFERENCES
U. R. Kattner, Technol. Metal. Mater. Min. 13 (1), 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.1059
K. Thomsen, M.C. Iliuta, and P. Rasmussen, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 3631 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.05.024
Pharmacopea RF, General Pharmacopoeial Article. OFS.1.1.0008.15.
H. I. Chen, H. Y. Chang, E. T. S. Huang, and T. C. Huang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39 (12), 4849 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie000099i
H.-Y. Chiu, M.-J. Lee, and H.-M. Lin, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (10), 2393 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/je800371a
A. Vega Gonzalez, R. Tufeu, and P. Subra, J. Chem. Eng. Data 47 (3), 492 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/je010202q
S. N. Joung, C. W. Yoo, H. Y. Shin, S. Y. Kim, K. P. Yoo, C. S. Lee, and W. S. Huh, Fluid Phase Equilib. 185 (1–2), 219 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812%2801%2900472-1
M. Kariznovi, H. Nourozieh, and J. Abedi, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 57, 408 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2012.10.002
A. Kordikowski, A.P. Schenk, R.M. Van Nielen, and C.J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 8 (3), 205 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-8446(95)90033-0
J. S. Lim, Y. Y. Lee, and H. S. Chun, J. Supercrit. Fluids 7 (4), 219 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-8446(94)90009-4
A. Mehl, F. P. Nascimento, P. W. Falcao, F. L. P. Pessoa, and L. Cardozo-Filho, J. Thermodyn. 2011, 251075 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/251075
A. Z. Panagiotopoulos and R. C. Reid, ACS Symposium Series. 1987. P. 115. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1987-0329.ch010
M. Stievano and N. J. Elvassore, Supercrit. Fluids 33 (1), 7 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2004.04.003
K. Suzuki, H. Sue, M. Itou, R.L. Smith, H. Inomata, K. Arai, and S. Saito, J. Chem. Eng. Data 35 (1), 63 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1021/je00059a020
A. E. Andreatta, L. J. Florusse, S. B. Bottini, and C. J. Peters, J. Supercrit. Fluids 42 (1), 60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2006.12.015
J. M. O. Bacicheti, J. A. Oliveira, T. V. Barros, L. Ferreira-Pinto, P. F. A. Castillo, V. F. Cabral, and L. Cardozo-Filho, J. Solution Chem. 51, 1292 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-022-01196-6
B. Calvignac, E. Rodier, J.-J. Letourneau, and J. Fages, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 7 (1), A46 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.2095
H. Y. Chiu, R. F. Jung, M. J. Lee, and H. M. Lin, J. Supercrit. Fluids 44 (3), 273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2007.09.026
M. P. Dirauf, M. Conrad, and A. S. Braeuer, Fluid Phase Equilib. 549 (113201), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113201
R. Rajasingam, L. Lioe, Q. T. Pham, and F. P. Lucien, J. Supercrit. Fluids 31 (3), 227 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2003.12.003
R. Bettini, A. Rossi, E. Lavezzini, E. Frigo, I. Pasquali, and F. Giordano, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 73, 487 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025417810761
M. Champeau, J.-M. Thomassin, C. Jerome, and T. Tassaing, J. Chem. Eng. Data 61 (2), 968 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.5b00812
Z. Huang, W. D. Lu, S. Kawi, and Y. C. Chiew, J. Chem. Eng. Data. 49 (5), 1323 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/je0499465
H. Behjati Rad, J. Karimi Sabet, and F. Varaminian, Chem. Eng. Technol. 42 (6), 1259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201900043
S. Ravipaty, K. Koebke, and D. Chesney, J. Chem. Eng. Data 53 (2), 415 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/je700486g
Z. Huang, Y.C. Chiew, W.-D. Lu, and S. Kawi, Fluid Phase Equilib. 237 (1–2), 9–15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2005.08.004
A. M. Vorobei, O. I. Pokrovskiy, K. B. Ustinovich, O. O. Parenago, and V. V. Lunin, J. Mol. Liq. 280, 212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.056
Z. Huang, Y.C. Chiew, M. Feng, H. Miao, J.-J. Li, and L. Xu, J. Supercrit. Fluids. 43 (2), 259 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2007.05.011
D.-Y. Peng and D. B. Robinson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15 (1), 59 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011
A. Bond, R. Boese, and G. Desiraju, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 46 (4), 615 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602378
J. A. Kaduk, C. E. Crowder, K. Zhong, T. G. Fawcett, and M. R. Suchomel, Powder Diffr. 26 (2), 202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715614000232
J.M. Leger, M. Goursolle, M. Gadret, and A. Carpy, Acta Cryst. B 34 (4), 1203 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1107/S056774087800521X
G. L. Perlovich, S. V. Kurkov, A. N. Kinchin, and A. Bauer-Brandl, AAPS J. 6, 3 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1208/ps060103
J. O. Valderrama and P. A. Robles, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (4), 1338 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0603058
J. O. Valderrama, W. W. Sanga, and J. A. Lazzus, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (4), 1318 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071055d
D. Ambrose and J. Walton, Pure Appl. Chem. 61 (8), 1395 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198961081395
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was carried out within the framework of the project “Chemical Thermodynamics and Theoretical Materials Science” (no. 121031300039-1).
Funding
This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by V. Glyanchenko
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voskov, A.L., Demchenko, A.M., Ivanov, A.S. et al. Some Methodological Aspects of Modeling Solid Phase–Supercritical Fluid Equilibria. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 17, 1603–1618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123080055
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123080055