Abstract
The healing potential of individual polymer implants for the reconstruction of extensive craniofacial defects after cancer resection is largely determined by the internal architecture of the implant. The architecture of an implant during polymer crystallization could affect the structure and shape of the implant at the micro and macro levels. In this study, the relationship between the internal architecture (triply periodic minimum surface structure (gyroid), cube, grid, and honeycomb) and shape changes of individual implants by 3D printing with a vinylidene fluoride-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer after crystallization is examined at a filling density of 70%. Using the method of differential scanning calorimetry, it is established that crystallization leads to the rearrangement of the crystalline structure of the implant into electrically active (ferroelectric) crystalline phases. Moreover, the type of internal architecture affects the change in the shape of the implant after crystallization. The results of the computed tomography show that structures with a triply periodic minimum surface (gyroid) provide the minimal deformation of the implant during crystallization, which makes such structures optimal for manufacturing implants for replacing bone defects in the zygomatic-orbital complex.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
D. E. Kulbakin, E. L. Choynzonov, S. P. Buyakova, et al., Head and Neck Russ. J. 6, 64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25792/HN.2018.6.4.64-69
A. M. Zhukov, V. I. Solodilov, I. V. Tretyakov, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 16, 926 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079312205013X
T. A. Ivanova and E. N. Golubeva, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 16, 426 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122030162
Yu. V. Tertyshnaya, A. V. Lobanov, and A. V. Khvatov, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 14, 1022 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793120060135
A. D. Badaraev, A. Koniaeva, S. A. Krikova, et al., Appl-. Surf. Sci. 504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144068
I. O. Akimchenko, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0070365
K. Kapat, Q. T. H. Shubhra, M. Zhou, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909045
V. V. Kochervinskii, Russ. Chem. Rev. 65, 936 (1996). doi iopscience.iop.org/0036-021X/65/10/R03
Y. Li, S. Tang, M. W. Pan, et al., Macromolecules 48, 8565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01895
M. Inoue, Y. Tada, K. Suganuma, et al., Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 92, 1833 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.07.003
A. J. Lovinger, G. E. Johnson, H. E. Bair, et al., J. Ap-pl. Phys. 56, 2412 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334303
Y. Murata, Polym. J. 19, 337 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.19.337
A. V. Rammohan, T. Lee, and V. B. C. Tan, Int. J. Appl. Mech. 7, 1550048 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825115500489
Z. Dong and X. Zhao, Eng. Regen. 2, 154 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2021.09.004
Funding
This study was supported by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Science project FSWW-2023-0007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vorobyev, A.O., Kulbakin, D.E., Chistyakov, S.G. et al. Influence of Internal Microarchitecture on the Shape of Individual Implants Made from Vinylidene Fluoride Copolymer by 3D Printing with High-Temperature Crystallization. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 17, 1316–1322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123060106
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123060106