Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction Study of Different Forms of Human Recombinant Anti-Mullerian Hormone with a Chimeric Analogue of the AMH Type II Receptor

  • Published:
Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), a homodimeric glycoprotein, described over 70 years ago by A. Jost, is the least studied member of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily. Despite the antitumor activity of AMH discovered at the end of the last century, creation of effective AMH-based drugs is hampered primarily by the lack of information on the mechanism of interaction of various AMH forms with a specific type II receptor (MISRII). Previously, we have shown that not only the full-length activated hormone but also its C-terminal fragment (C-rAMH) could bind to MISRII. In this work, using the surface plasmon resonance technique, we have compared the interaction of three forms of recombinant AMH (rAMH) with the MISRII analogue—the chimeric protein MISRII-Fc containing AMH type II receptor and-Fc fragment of the human IgG1 heavy chain. Comparison of the binding of MISRII-Fc, immobilized on a chip with group specificity for human immunoglobulins, to C-rAMH, to intact rAMH (pro-rAMH), and to rAMH containing one uncleaved monomer (hc-rAMH), showed that the KD of the complexes increased: 1.7 nM, 88 nM and 110 nM, respectively. Thus, we have shown that the C-terminal fragment of AMH exhibits the maximum affinity for the recombinant MISRII analogue, thus indicating the prospects for the development of drugs based on this hormone derivative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Tsimberidou, A.M., Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2015, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1113–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2861-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gharpure, K.M., Wu, S.Y., Li, C., Lopez-Berestein, G., and Sood, A.K., Clin. Cancer Res., 2015, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 3121–3130. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. MacLaughlin, D.T. and Donahoe, P.K., Future Oncol., 2010, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 391–405. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.09.172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLennan, I.S. and Pankhurst, M.W., J. Endocrinol., 2015, vol. 226, no. 3, pp. R45–R57. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rey, R., Lukas-Croisier, C., Lasala, C., and Bedecarrás, P., Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 2003, vol. 211, nos. 1–2, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2003.09.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane, A.H. and Donahoe, P.K., J. Endocrinol., 1998, vol. 158, vol. 1, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1580001

  7. Pankhurst, M.W., Leathart, B.L.A., Batchelor, N.J., and McLennan, I.S., Endocrinology, 2016, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 1622–1629. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rak, A.Ya., Trofimov, A.V., Stefanov, V.E., and Ischenko, A.M., Biol. Comm., 2019, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 201–210. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2019.304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Josso, N., Belville, C., di Clemente, N., and Picard, J.Y., Hum. Reprod. Update, 2005, vol. 11, vol. 4, pp. 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi014

  10. Durlinger, A.A.L.L., Visser, J.J.A., and Them-men, A.A.P.N., Reproduction, 2002, vol. 124, pp. 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1240601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sriraman, V., Niu, E., Matias, J.R., Donahoe, P.K., MacLaughlin, D.T., Hardy, M.P., and Lee, M.M., J. Androl., 2001, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02577.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, J.H., MacLaughlin, D.T., and Donahoe, P.K., Obstet. Gynecol. Sci., 2014, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 343–357. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Donahoe, P.K., Clarke, T., Teixeira, J., Maheswaran, S., and MacLaughlin, D.T., Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 2003, vol. 211, nos. 1–2, pp. 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2003.09.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck, T.N., Korobeynikov, V.A., Kudinov, A.E., Georgopoulos, R., Solanki, N.R., Andrews-Hoke, M., Kistner, T.M., Pepin, D., Donahoe, P.K., Nicolas, E., Einarson, M.B., Zhou, Y., Boumber, Y., Proia, D.A., Serebriiskii, I.G., and Golemis, E.A., Cell Rep., 2016, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbie, T.U., Barbie, D.A., MacLaughlin, D.T., Maheswaran, S., and Donahoe, P.K., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 15601–15606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2636900100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pépin, D., Sosulski, A., Zhang, L., Wang, D., Vathipadiekal, V., Hendren, K., Coletti, C.M., Yu, A., Castro, C.M., Birrer, M.J., Gao, G., and Dona-hoe, P.K., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2015, vol. 112, no. 32, pp. E4418–E4427. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510604112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakkum-Gamez, J.N., Aletti, G., Lewis, K.A., Keeney, G.L., Thomas, B.M., Navarro-Teulon, I., and Cliby, W.A., Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kersual, N., Garambois, V., Chardès, T., Pouget, J.P., Salhi, I., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Bibeau, F., Busson, M., Vie, H., Clemenceau, B., Behrens, C.K., Estupina, P., Pelegrin, A., and Navarro-Teulon, I., MAbs, 2014, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1314–1326. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.29316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Song, J.Y., Chen, K.Y., Kim, S.Y., Kim, M.R., Ryu, K.S., Cha, J.H., Kang, C.S., Maclaughlin, D.T., and Kim, J.H., Int. J. Oncol., 2009, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1583–1591. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S., Schwartz, A.G., Qureshi, F., Jacques, S., Malone, J., and Munkarah, A.R., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, vol. 189, no. 4, pp. 1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00579-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jost, A., Recent Progr. Hormon Res., 1953, vol. 8, pp. 379–413.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cate R.L., Donahoe P.K., MacLaughlin D.T., in Peptide Growth Factors and Their Receptors II, Sporn, M.B. and Roberts, A.B., Eds., Heidelberg: Springer, 1990, pp. 179–210.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rak, A.Ya., Trofimov, A.V., Pigareva, N.V., Simbirtsev, A.S., and Ischenko, A.M., Cell Tissue Biol., 2018, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X18060093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rak, A.Ya., Trofimov, A.V., Pigareva, N.V., Protasov, E.A., Karabanova, E.A., and Ischenko, A.M., Biomed. Chromatogr., 2020, vol. 34, no. 5, e4782. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.4782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Westermeier, R., Electrophoresis in Practice: A Guide to Methods and Applications of DNA and Protein Separations, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall, T.A., Nucl. Acid. S., 1999, vol. 41, pp. 95–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu, G. and Moriyama, E.N., Brief. Bioinform., 2005, vol. 5, pp. 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/5.4.378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahmood, T. and Yang, P.C., North Am. J. Med. Sci., 2012, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 429–434. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.100998

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are very grateful to the staff of the Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics of the Department of Molecular Genetics of the Institute of Experimental Medicine for providing equipment and assistance in experiments.

Funding

The work was performed within the framework of the State Contract no. 14.N08.11.0104 dated August 25, 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ya. Rak.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. This work does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants as research objects.

Additional information

Translated by A. Medvedev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rak, A.Y., Trofimov, A.V., Ischenko, A.M. et al. Interaction Study of Different Forms of Human Recombinant Anti-Mullerian Hormone with a Chimeric Analogue of the AMH Type II Receptor. Biochem. Moscow Suppl. Ser. B 15, 232–240 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990750821030082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990750821030082

Keywords:

Navigation