Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation of the Ethnic Population of Eastern Siberia: Post-Soviet Trends

  • Published:
Geography and Natural Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—Using the results of the 1989 and 2010 censuses, an analysis is made of the post-Soviet transformation of the ethnic composition of the population of Eastern Siberia at three territorial levels: the macroregion as a whole, regions (federal subjects), and municipalities. Among the groups of peoples distinguished by the geographical feature, a decrease in the population size and proportion is characteristic for Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians, the peoples of the Ural–Volga region, Germans and Jews; the population growth and an increase in the proportion correspond to the large and small indigenous peoples of Siberia, the peoples of Central Asia, Transcaucasia, and East Asia. The focus is on the Russian and indigenous peoples, who prevail in the total population. An increase in their total proportion for 1989–2010 has been revealed, which reflects a tendency for a decrease in ethnic diversity. A tendency has been established for a sharp increase in the polarization of ethnic space into “Russian” regions (Krasnoyarsk and Zabaikalskii krais and Irkutsk oblast) and “ethnic” regions (the Republics of Buryatia, Sakha (Yakutia), Tyva, and Khakassia). While in the first of them and Khakassia the share of Russians increased, in three republics, especially in Tyva and Yakutia, there is an active process of monoethnicization (“indigenization”). A zoning of the ethnic space of Eastern Siberia was carried out according to four components identified by the proportion of the Russian population in municipalities: the Russian ethnic core, the contact zone of the Russian megacore, and the inner and outer periphery of the Russian megacore. The post-Soviet dynamics of the ethnic space is characterized by the expansion of its two opposite key components: the Russian ethnic core and the outer periphery, which confirms the tendency for the polarization of the districts and cities into “Russian” and “ethnic.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Streletskii, V.N., Cultural geography, in Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya v Rossii (Socio-Economic Geography in Russia), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2016, pp. 76–87.

  2. Bezrukov, L.A. and Razmakhnina, Yu.S., Theoretical study of ethnicity and ethnic processes in social geography, Geopolit. Geodin. Reg., 2018, vol. 4 (14), no. 4, pp. 53–65.

  3. Streletskii, V.N., Russia in ethnocultural dimension: factors of regionalization and spatial structures, in Regional’noe razvitie i regional’naya politika Rossii v perekhodnyi period (Regional Development and Regional Policy of Russia in the Transition Period), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ., 2011, pp. 146–176.

  4. Orlov, A.Yu., Historical and geographical aspects of the transformation of the ethnic structure of the population in Russian Federation, Reg. Issled., 2013, no. 2 (40), pp. 120–124.

  5. Zhitin, D.V., Changes in the settlement pattern of the Russian ethnos within the boundaries of the Russian federation from the second half of the 20th century to the early 21st century, Reg. Res. Russ., 2013, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhitin, D.V., Native language as an indicator of assimilation processes in Russian Federation, Reg. Issled., 2014, no. 2 (44), pp. 96–106.

  7. Safronov, S.G., Modern trends in the transformation of the ethnic composition of the population in Russia, Balt. Reg., 2015, no. 3 (25), pp. 138–153.

  8. Manakov, A.G., Main trends in the transformation of the ethnic space of the Central Asian macroregion from 1897 to 2017, Reg. Res. Russ., 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manakov, A.G., Transformation of the ethnic space of Russia in the 18th-19th centuries: historical and geographical analysis, Izv. Ross. Geogr. O-va, 2019, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Belozerov, V.S., Etnicheskaya karta Severnogo Kavkaza (Ethnic Map of the North Caucasus), Moscow: OGI, 2005.

  11. Orlov, A.Yu., Geodemographic studies of ethno-assimilation processes (by the example of the population of the Volga Federal District), Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2011, no. 1, pp. 129–136.

  12. Manakov, A.G., Assessment of the ethnic mosaicism of the regions of European Russia in the periods between the censuses of 1897, 1959 and 2010, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2019, no. 2, pp. 117–128.

  13. Gerasimenko, T.I., Problemy etnokul’turnogo razvitiya transgranichnykh regionov (Ethnocultural Development of Cross-Border Regions), St. Petersburg, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Degteva, Zh.F., Transformation of the ethnic structure in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Reg. Issled., 2013, no. 1, pp. 80–85.

  15. Druzhinin, A.G., Ethno-demographic transformations in the center-peripheral structure of Rostov oblast (post-Soviet trends), Reg. Issled., 2015, no. 3 (49), pp. 78–85.

  16. Chikhichin, V.V. and Belozerov, V.S., Ethnic map of the Stavropol region: spatio-temporal dynamics over the past half of century, Reg. Issled., 2015, no. 4 (50), pp. 113–119.

  17. Gerasimenko, T.I. and Rodoman, B.B., Ethno-contact zones as a type of ethnocultural regions, Vestn. ARGO, 2018, no. 7, pp. 55–67.

  18. Vorob’ev, V.V., Formirovanie naseleniya Vostochnoi Sibiri (geograficheskie osobennosti i problemy) (Formation of the Population of Eastern Siberia: Geographic Features and Problems), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1975.

  19. Vorob’ev, V.V., Naselenie Vostochnoi Sibiri (sovremennaya dinamika i voprosy prognozirovaniya) (Population of Eastern Siberia: Modern Dynamics and Forecasts), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1977.

  20. Bulaev, V.M., Etnonatsional’nye osobennosti formirovaniya naseleniya Vostochnogo Zabaykal’ya (sotsial’no-geograficheskaya interpretatsiya) (Ethno-National Features of the Formation of the Population of Eastern Transbaikalia: Socio-Geographical Interpretation), Ulan-Ude: Buryat. Nauchn. Tsentr, Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1998.

  21. Zadorozhnyi, V.F., Mikheev, V.S., Naprasnikov, A.T., Ishmuratov, B.M., Lyamkin, V.F., Ryashchenko, S.V., Solovova, A.T., and Shkarovskii, V.I., Traditsionnoe prirodopol’zovanie evenkov: obosnovanie territorii v Chitinskoi oblasti (Traditional Nature Management of the Evenks: Substantiation of Territories in Chita Oblast), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1995.

  22. Ragulina, M.V., Korennye etnosy sibirskoi taigi. Motivatsiya i struktura prirodopol’zovaniya (na primere tofalarov i evenkov Irkutskoi oblasti) (Indigenous Ethnic Groups of the Siberian Taiga. Motivation and Structure of Nature Management (by the Example of Tofalars and Evenks of Irkutsk Oblast)), Novosibirsk: Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2000.

  23. Ragulina, M.V., Kul’turnaya geografiya: teorii, metody, regional’nyi sintez (Cultural Geography: Theories, Methods, and Regional Synthesis), Irkutsk: Inst. Geogr., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004.

  24. Territorii traditsionnogo prirodopol’zovaniya Vostochnoi Sibiri. Geograficheskie aspekty obosnovaniya i analiza (Territories of Traditional Nature Management in Eastern Siberia: Geographic Aspects and Analysis), Korytnyi, L.M., Ed., Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zadorozhnyi, V.F., Naprasnikov, A.T., and Radnayev, B.L., Zonal’nye tipy prirodopol’zovaniya: opyt geograficheskogo i etnicheskogo obosnovaniya i analiza (Zonal Types of Nature Management: Geographical and Ethnic Justification and Analysis), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2010.

  26. Kuklina, V.V., Lokal’nye soobshchestva Yuzhnoi Sibiri v polietnichnoi srede: kul’turno-geograficheskii srez (Local Communities of Southern Siberia in a Multiethnic Environment: Cultural and Geographical Aspects), Novosibirsk: Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2006.

  27. Tsydypova, L.S., Istoriko-geograficheskie osobennosti formirovaniya etnokul’turnogo landshafta Barguzinskogo Pribaykal’ya (Historical and Geographical Features of the Formation of the Ethnocultural Landscape of the Barguzin Cis-Baikal Region), Moscow: Infra-M, 2018.

  28. Pokshishevskii, V.V., Geografiya naseleniya SSSR (Geography of Population in the USSR), Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1971.

  29. Balakina, G.F. and Anaiban, Z.V., Sovremennaya Tuva: sotsiokul’turnye i etnicheskie protsessy (Modern Tuva: Sociocultural and Ethnic Processes), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1995.

  30. Popkov, Yu.V., Ethnosocial processes in Siberia: theory and practice, Nov. Issled. Tuvy, 2016, no. 2, p. 5. https://nit.tuva.asia/nit/article/view/92. Cited May 15, 2020.

  31. Tarbastaeva, I. S., Tuva is turning into a mono-ethnic region: risks and prospects, EKO, 2018, no. 5, pp. 65–79.

  32. Zhigunova, M., Different, but together, Ekspert-Sib., 2011, no. 50, pp. 11–13.

  33. Bufetova, A.N., Kolomak, E.A., and Khrzhanovskaya, A.A., National and religious diversity of Russian regions, EKO, 2018, no. 5, pp. 28–43.

  34. Tikhonov, S., Ulan-Ude: national climatic trap, Ekspert, 2019, no. 9, pp. 34–39.

Download references

Funding

The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project number 19-311-90048.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. A. Bezrukov or Yu. S. Razmakhina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bezrukov, L.A., Razmakhina, Y.S. Transformation of the Ethnic Population of Eastern Siberia: Post-Soviet Trends. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 42, 232–240 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372821030069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372821030069

Keywords:

Navigation