Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Gully Potential of a Territory (A Case Study of Central Yamal)

  • Regional problems of Environmental studies and Natural Resources utilization
  • Published:
Geography and Natural Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern processes of gully erosion and thermoerosion are clearly pronounced in the permafrost zone in the north of Western Siberia, on the Yamal Peninsula, including in the territories of new development. Under these conditions, knowledge of the gully potential is necessary for the rational siting of buildings and infrastructure in the areas of new development in order to avoid their damage and destruction by newly formed gullies. The gully erosion potential was calculated for one of the valley catchments in the area of the Bovanenkovo gas condensate field. The dynamic model of gully erosion and thermoerosion (GULTEM) was used, which describes the main gullying processes in the permafrost zone and permits a reasonable assessment of the gully erosion potential. The calculations were done in terms of the ArcticDEM digital elevation model, climate data were obtained from the nearest node of the ERA-Interim reanalysis grid, and water discharges were calculated using the hydrological model calibrated with observational data on this catchment. The gully erosion potential was estimated for different values of the critical rate of erosion initiation for the upper soil layer with vegetation. The calculated gully erosion potential was compared with the erosion relief on the catchment. It has been established that the gully potential calculated for severely disturbed vegetation cover corresponds to the erosion network in the catchment area formed over more than 30 years of its development. It is concluded that the erosion potential of this catchment is mainly developed, with low probability of a further lengthening of the gully network. Therefore, only rill erosion can damage the infrastructure of the Bovanenkovo gas condensate field, mainly located on a flat watershed surface, the consequences of which are easily eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Zorina, E.F., Gully Erosion: Patterns and Potential of Development, Moscow: GEOS, 2003 [in Russian]..

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zorina, E.F., Computational Methods to Determine the Potential of Gully Erosion, Eroziya Pochv i Ruslovye Protsessy, 1979, issue 7, pp. 81–89 [in Russian].

  3. Sidorchuk, A.Yu., The Model for Calculating the Morphometry of a Stable Gully, Geomorfologiya, 1998, no. 2, pp. 43–52 [in Russian].

  4. Patton, P.C. and Shumm, S.A., Gully Erosion, Northern Colorado: A Threshold Phenomenon, Geology, 1975, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Begin, Z.B. and Schumm, S.A., Instability of Alluvial Valley Floors: A Method for Its Assessment, Trans. ASAE, 1979, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 347–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Begin, Z.B. and Schumm, S.A., Gradational Thresholds and Landform Singularity: Significance for Quaternary Studies, Quaternary Res., 1984, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvey, M.D., Watson, C.C. and Schumm, S.A., Gully Erosion: Tech. Note 366, Washington: U. S. Dep. of the Inter., Bur. of Land Management, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gartsman, B.I., Analysis of Geomorphological Conditions for Primary Streams Formation Using Digital Elevation Models, Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2013, vol. 34, issue 1, pp 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vandaele, K., Poesen, J., Govers, G., and Wesemael, B., van, Geomorphic Threshold Conditions for Ephemeral Gully Incision, Geomorphology, 1996, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moscow, N.I., The Channel of a River and Erosion Within Its Basin, Moscow; Izd. Akad. Nauk., 1955 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sidorchuk, A.Yu., Dynamical Model of Gully Erosion, Geomorfologiya, 1998, no. 4, pp. 28–38 [in Russian].

  12. Sidorchuk, A., Gully Erosion in the Cold Environment: Risks and Hazards, Adv. Environ. Res., 2015, vol. 44, pp. 139–192.

  13. Sidorchuk, A.Yu., Anthropogenic Gully Erosion and Thermoerosion in the Western Part of Central Yamal, Geomorfologiya, 2000, no. 3, pp. 95–103 [in Russian].

  14. Kosov, B.F., Nikol’skaya, I.I. and Zorina, E.F., Experimental Research on Gullying, in Experimental Geomorphology, N.I. Makkaveev, Ed., Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Univ., 1978, Issue 3, pp. 113–140 [in Russian].

  15. Sidorchuk, A., Märker, M., Moretti, S., and Rodolfi, G., Soil Erosion Modelling in the Mbuluzi River Catchment (Swaziland, South Africa). Part I: Modelling the Dynamic Evolution of Gullies, Geogr. Fis. e Din. Quat., 2001. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 177–187.

  16. Kosov, B.F., Gully Erosion in the Tundra Zone, Nauch. Dokl. Vyssh. Shkoly, Geol.-Geogr. Nauki, 1959, no. 1, pp. 123–131 [in Russian].

  17. Kosov, B.F., Gully Erosion in Siberia, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5. Geografiya, 1960, no. 3, pp. 54–59 [in Russian].

  18. Gel’fan, A.N., Model of the Water Runoff During Snowmelt and Rainfalls, in Erosion Processes of Central Yamal, A.Yu. Sidorchuk and A.V. Baranov, Eds., St. Petersburg: Izd. Ros. Nauch.-Issled. Inst. Kul’turnogo i Prirodnogo Naslediya, 1999, pp. 205–224 [in Russian].

  19. Vinogradov, Yu.B., Mathematical Modeling of Runoff Formation Processes: Experience of a Critical Analysis, Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1988 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vinogradov, Yu.B., Vinogradova, Yu.B., Zhuravlev, S.A., and Zhuravleva, A.D., Runoff Modeling for Ungauged Catchments: A Case Study in Yamal Peninsula, Russia, Vestn. Sankt-Peterb. Univ. Ser. 7. Geologiya. Geografiya, 2014, no. 3, pp. 71–81 [in Russian].

  21. Bobrovitskaya, N.N., Baranov, A.V., Vasilenko, M.N., and Zubkova, K.M., The Runoff of Water and Sediments on Gully Catchments, in Erosion Processes of Central Yamal, A.Yu. Sidorchuk and A.V. Baranov, Eds., St. Petersburg: Izd. Ros. Nauch.-Issled. Inst. Kul’turnogo i Prirodnogo Naslediya, 1999, pp. 90–105 [in Russian].

  22. ArcticDEM. 2018 Harvard Dataverse V1. URL: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OHHUKH (Accessed 12.12.2018) [in Russian].

  23. QGIS Development Team. 2004–2014. V3.4. URL: https://qgis.org (Accessed 12.15.2018).

  24. Grigoriev, V.Ya. and Sidorchuk, A.Yu., Forecast of Rain Erosion of Tundra Soils in te Yamal Peninsula, Pochvovedenie, 1995, no. 3, pp. 351–357 [in Russian].

  25. Sidorchuk, A. and Grigor’ev, V., Soil Erosion on the Yamal Peninsula (Russian Arctic) Due to Gas Field Exploitation, in Advances in GeoEcology, Catena Verlag: Reiskirchen, 1998, vol. 31, pp. 805–811.

Download references

Funding

This work was done with the financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (18–05–60147).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    A. Yu. Sidorchuk

Authors
  1. A. Yu. Sidorchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Yu. Sidorchuk.

Additional information

Translated by V.B.Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sidorchuk, A.Y. Assessing the Gully Potential of a Territory (A Case Study of Central Yamal). Geogr. Nat. Resour. 41, 178–186 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372820020109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372820020109

Keywords:

Search

Navigation