Skip to main content
Log in

A seismic hazard assessment and the results of detailed seismic zoning for urban territories of Sakhalin Island

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Pacific Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work briefly discusses the main features of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). Special attention is paid to the identification and quantification of uncertainties related to seismic source characteristics and seismic engineering models for prediction of strong ground motions. The principal seismic models and the results of PSHA application for detailed seismic zoning of urban territories in Sakhalin Island are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. V. Kirillova and A. V. Sorskii, “On the Technique of Constructing the Seismic Zoning Map 1: 1000000: A Case Study of Caucasus,” Byul. Sov. Seismol., No. 8, 121–124 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Nevel’sk Earthquake and Tsunami of August 2, 2007, Sakhalin Is. Ed. by B. W. Levin and I. N. Tikhonov (Yanus-K, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. S. Oskorbin, “Seismogenic Zones of Sakhalin and Adjacent Areas,” in Problems of Seismic Hazard in the Russian Far East (Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 1997), pp. 154–178 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Regional Earthquake Catalog of Sakhalin Is., Ed. by L. N. Poplavskaya (IMGiG DVO RAN, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. I. Reisner, Geological Method of Seismic Hazard Assessment (Nedra, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Building Norms and Regulations (SNiP II-7-81*): Building in Regions of Seismic Hazard (Gosstroi, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

  7. V. I. Ulomov and L. S. Shumilina, “The Set of Maps for General Seismic Zoning of the Russian Federation’s Territory,” Seismostoik. Stroit., No. 4, 30–34 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Abrahamson and W. Silva, “Summary of Abrahamson and Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations,” Earthquake Spectra 24, 67–98 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Atkinson and E. Sonley, “Empirical Relationships Between Modified Mercalli Intensity and Response Spectra,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90(2), 537–544 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Bazurro and C. A. Cornell, “Disaggregation of Seismic Hazard,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89(2), 501–520 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Bender and D. M. Perkins, “SEISRISK III: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation,” U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull., No. 1772 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. M. Boore and G. M. Atkinson, “Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0,” Earthquake Spectra 24, 99–138 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. K. Gardner and L. Knopoff, “Is the Sequence of Earthquake in Southern California with Aftershocks Removed, Poissonian?,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64, 1363–1367 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. W. Campbell, “Engineering Models of Strong Ground Motion,” in Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Ed. by W. F. Chen and C. Scawthorn (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003), p. 5-1–5-76.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. W. Campbell, “Prediction of Strong Ground Motion Using Hybrid Empirical Method and Its Use in the Development of Ground Motion (Attenuation) Relations in Eastern North America,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1012–1033 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, “NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0. 01 To 10 s,” Earthquake Spectra 24, 139–172 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B. S. J. Chiou and R. R. Youngs, “NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters,” Earthquake Spectra 24, 173–216 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Cornell, “Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58, 1583–1606 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. A. Cornell and S. R. Winterstein, “Temporal and Magnitude Dependence in Earthquake Recurrence Models,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 1522–1537 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. M. Idriss, “An NGA Empirical Model for Estimating the Horizontal Spectral Values Generated by Shallow Crustal Earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra 24, 217–242 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ISO 19901-2:2004. Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Specific requirements for offshore structures. P. 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria, (European Committee for Standartization, Brussels, 2004).

  22. J. Kaklamanos, L. G. Baise, and D. M. Boore, “Estimating Unknown Input Parameters When Implementing the NGA Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Engineering Practice,” Earthquake Spectra 27, 1219–1235 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Scherbaum, J. Schmedes, and F. Cotton, “On the Conversion of Source-to-Site Distance Measures for Extended Earthquake Source Models,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 1053–1069 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. J. Stafford, F. O. Strasser, and J. J. Bommer, “An Evaluation of the Applicability of the NGA Models to Ground-Motion Prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean Region,” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 149–177 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. G. Thenhaus and K. W. Campbell, “Seismic hazards analysis,” in Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Ed. by W. F. Chen and C. Scawthorn (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003), p. 5-1–5-76.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. L. Wells and K. J. Coppersmith, “New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84(4), 974–1002 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Woessner and S. Wiemer, “Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95(2), 684–698 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R. R. Youngs and K. J. Coppersmith, “Implication of Fault Slip Rates and Earthquake Recurrence Models to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Estimates,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76(4), 939–964 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. W. Levin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © B.W. Levin, Ch.U. Kim, V.N. Solovjev, 2012, published in Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya, 2012, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 93–103.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levin, B.W., Kim, C.U. & Solovjev, V.N. A seismic hazard assessment and the results of detailed seismic zoning for urban territories of Sakhalin Island. Russ. J. of Pac. Geol. 7, 455–464 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714013060092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714013060092

Keywords

Navigation