Skip to main content
Log in

Cenozoic stress fields in the Kiselevka fault zone, Lower Amur region

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Pacific Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of tectonic sliding surfaces (hereafter, slickensides) and striae, as well as strike-slip echelons of quartz streaks, in the Kiselevka fault zone made it possible to reconstruct four groups of stress fields with a wide age range (from the Paleocene to Recent). The meridional compression and latitudinal extension of the earliest stress field promoted the left-lateral displacement along the Kiselevka fault. The fault activation in that period was accompanied by the final-phase magmatite formation in the East Sikhote-Alin volcanoplutonic belt. In contrast, the subsequent stress field of the sublatitudinal compression and submeridional extension changed the fault kinematics to right-lateral strike-slip ones. The origin and development of the Udyl intermontane depression is linked to these deformations. Upthrow deformations complicated the structure of the Udyl depression, whereas normal fault deformations produced the depression of Lake Udyl and the bays along the left bank of the Amur River.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Ya. Abramson, State Geological Map of the USSR. 1: 200000. Nizhne-Amurskaya Series. Sheet M-54-II. Explanatory Notes (Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, 1959) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Akhmet’ev, State Geological Map of USSR. 1: 200000. Nizhnee-Amurskaya Series. Sheet M-54-III. Explanatory Notes. (Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geodynamics, Magmatism, and Metallogeny of Eastern Russia, Ed. by A. I. Khanchuk (Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geological Map of the Amur Region and Adjacent Regions. 1: 2 500 000. Explanatory Notes (St. Petersburg-Blagoveshchensk-Harbin, 1999) [in Russian].

  5. Geological Map of USSR. 1: 200 000. Sheet M-54-XXXIII: Explanatory Notes, Comp. by S. B. Bravina and I. I. Tuchkov; Ed. by I. I. Tuchkov (Moscow, 1963), p. 64 [in Russian].

  6. M. V. Gzovskii, Principles of Tectonophysics (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. A. Kochermagin, I. L. Nikol’skii, V. S. Emets, and A. P. Ivanov, “Tectonophysical Analysis in Studying of the Rocks and Ore Bodies of the Chu-Ili Ore Belt,” Geotektonika, No. 4, 38–44 (1990).

  8. B. A. Natal’in and Ch. B. Borukaev, “Mesozoic Sutures of the Southern Far East of USSR,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 84–97 (1991).

  9. T. V. Merkulova and G. L. Kirillova, “Structure and Prospects of Oil-and-Gas Potential of the Northern Chains of the Itun-Ilan Branch of the Tan-Lu Faults,” Tikhookean. Geol. 23(6), 55–75 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. D. Parfenov, “On Method of Tectonophysical Analysis of Geological Structures,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 60–72 (1984).

  11. S. A. Salun, Tectonics and Evolution of the Sikhote-Alin Geosynclinal Fold System (Nedra, Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Middle Amur Sedimentary Basin: Geological Structure, Geodynamics, Fuel-Energetic Resources. Series “Sedimentary Basins of East Russia,” Ed. by A. I. Khanchuk and G. L. Kirillova (DVO RAN, Vladivostok, 2009), Vol. 3 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. M. Anderson, The Dynamics of Faulting (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Kudymov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Kudymov, 2010, published in Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya, 2010, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 49–56.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kudymov, A.V. Cenozoic stress fields in the Kiselevka fault zone, Lower Amur region. Russ. J. of Pac. Geol. 4, 495–501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714010060047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714010060047

Keywords

Navigation