Skip to main content

Numerical and Analytical Approaches to Modeling Critical Two-Phase Flow with Granular Layer

Abstract

Based on data obtained in the previous experimental study conducted by the authors, two approaches are proposed for analytical and numerical modeling of a critical two-phase flow in a pipe with a granular layer. An analytical approach is based on a polytrophic model, while a numerical approach was developed using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. A model of isenthalpic flow of vapor–water mixture in a fixed bed of solid particles is considered is this study. The mixture expansion process is considered to be polytropic. Similarly to the known problem of gas dynamics of a granular bed, an analytical relationship for calculation of a critical mass velocity was obtained. The results of the calculation based on the analytical and numerical models were compared with the experimental data and agreement between analytical and numerical data and the experiment was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Tairov, E.A., Pokusaev, B.G., and Bykova, S.M., Vapor–Liquid Critical Flow through a Layer of Spherical Particles, High Temp., 2016, vol. 54, pp. 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Goldstick, M.A., Protsessy perenosa v zernistomsloe (TransferProcesses inGranular Layer), Novosibirsk: Inst. of Thermophysics SB RAS, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kim, S., Mudawar, I., and Int, J., Review of Flow Boiling and Critical Heat Flux in Microgravity, Heat Mass Tranfer, 2015, vol. 87, pp. 470–497.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Henry, R.E. and Fauske, H.K., The Two-Phase Critical Flow of One-Component Mixtures in Nozzles, Orifices, and Short Tubes, Heat Transfer, 1971, vol. 93, pp. 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Avdeev, A.A. and Soziev, R.I., Hydrodynamic Drag of a Flow of Steam-Water Mixture in a Pebble Bed, High Temp., 2008, vol. 46, pp. 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Avdeev, A.A., Balunov, B.F., Rybin, R.A., et al., Critical Flow of Steam-Water in a Packed Bed, High Temp., 2033, vol. 41, pp. 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kontsyrev, B.L., Kroshilin, A.E., and Nigmatulin, B.I., Nonstationary Thermodynamic Equilibrium Flow of BoilingWater Vessel with Faucets, High Temp., 1985, vol. 23, pp. 1125–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nigmatulin, R.I., Dinamika mnogofaznykh sred, tt. 1, 2 (Multiphase Medium Dynamics, vols. 1, 2), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Melikhov, B.I., Melikhov, O.I., and Parfenov, U.V., Analysis of Sensitivity of Computational Results Based on Code ATHLET of Experimental Regime with Big Leakage of Heat Carrier on a Stand BK B-213, Higher Ed. Inst. Lett., Nuclear Energy, 2007, pp. 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jeong, J.H., Jhona, M.S., Halowb, J.S., and Osdol, J., Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Applications to Heat Conduction, Comp. Phys. Comm., 2003, vol. 153, pp. 71–84.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Drew, D.A., Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow, Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech., 1983, vol. 15, pp. 261–291.

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Flesch, B. and Cochet, D., Leak-before-Break in Steam Generator Tubes, Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping, 1990, vol. 43, pp. 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    John, H., Reimann, J., Westphal, F., and Friedel, L. Critical Two-Phase Flow through Rough Slits, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1988, vol. 14, pp. 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hu, X.Y. and Adams, N.A., A Multi-Phase SPH Method forMacroscopic and Mesoscopic Flows, J. Comp. Phys., 2006, vol. 213, pp. 844–861.

    ADS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yang, X. and Kong, S., A Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method for Evaporating Multiphase Flows, Phys. Rev. E, 2017, vol. 96, 033309.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Grenier, N., A Hamiltonian Interface SPH Formulation for Multi-Fluid and Free Surface Flows, J. Comp. Phys., 2009, vol. 228, pp. 8380–8393.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Monaghan, J.J., Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys., 2005, vol. 68, pp. 1703–1759.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pokusaev, B.G., Tairov, E.A., and Vasilev, S.A., Speed of Low-Frequency PressureWaves in Vapor–Liquid Medium with Static Layer of Spherical Particles, Akust. Zh., 2010, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gubaidullin, D.A., Nikiforov, A.A., and Gafiatov R.N., AcousticWaves in Two Fraction Bubbly Liquids with Phase Transitions, High Temp., 2012, vol. 50, pp. 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gasenko, V.G., Gorelik, R.S., Nakoryakov, V.E., and Timkin, L.S., Measurement of Acoustic Wave Phase Velocity by FourierMethod in Gas–LiquidMedium, J. Eng. Therm., 2015, vol. 24, pp. 330–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tairov, E. and Khan, P.V., A Polytropic Model of a Critical Two-Phase Flow in a Bed of Spherical Particles, MATEC Web Conf., 2017, 115:05007, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711505007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. G. Pokusaev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pokusaev, B.G., Tairov, E.A., Khan, P.V. et al. Numerical and Analytical Approaches to Modeling Critical Two-Phase Flow with Granular Layer. J. Engin. Thermophys. 27, 20–29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232818010022

Download citation