Skip to main content

Exergy analysis for greener gas turbine engine arrangements

Abstract

Exergy analysis is a method that uses the conservation of mass and conservation of energy principles together with the second law of thermodynamics for the analysis, design, and improvement of energy and other systems. The exergy method is a useful tool for furthering the goal of more efficient energy-resource use, for it enables the locations, types, and magnitudes of wastes and losses to be identified and meaningful efficiencies to be determined. The exergy analysis of two-shaft gas turbine arrangements is presented and discussed in this paper. Two configurations (in parallel and series free turbine) are presented here and analyzed separately to identify and quantify the energy and exergy losses. Comparison between the two configurations is presented in terms of work output, efficiency, SFC, exergy destruction, and second-law efficiency for the design conditions. The percentage ratio of the exergy destruction in the individual components to total exergy destruction was found maximum in the combustion chambers (above 90%). The second-law efficiency of series configuration is found to be higher than parallel.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Rosen, M. and Dincer, I., Exergy, Energy and Sustainable Development, UK: Elsevier, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Utlu, Z. and Hepbasli, A., A Review on Analyzing and Evaluating the Energy Utilization Efficiency of Countries, Ren. Sust. Energy Reviews, 2007, vol. 11, pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Szargut, D.R. and Morris, F.R. Steward, Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes, New York: Hemisphere, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rosen, M. and Dincer, I., Exergy as the Confluence of Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, Exergy Int. J., 2001, vol. 1,iss. 1, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dincer, I. and Cengel, Y.A., Energy, Entropy and Exergy Concepts and Their Roles in Thermal Engineering, Entropy, 2001, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 116–149.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Song, T.W., Sohn, J.L., Kim, J.H., Kim, T.S., and Ro, S.T., Exergy-Based Performance Analysis of the Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine in Part-Load Operating Conditions, Exergy, 2002, vol. 2,iss. 2, pp. 105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kwon, Y., Kwan, H., and Oh, S., Exergo-Economic Analysis of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Systems, Exergy, 2001, vol. 1,iss. 1, pp. 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Badran, O., Gas-Turbine Performance Improvements, Appl. Energy, 1999, no. 64, pp. 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Carcasci, C. and Facchini, B., Comparison between TwoGas Turbine Solutions to Increase Combined Power Plant Efficiency, Energy Conv.Man., 2000, vol. 41, pp. 757–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Verkhivker, G. and Kosoy, B., On the Exergy Analysis of Power Plants, Energy Conv. Man., 2001, vol. 42, pp. 2053–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Marrero, I., Lefsaker, A., Razani, A., and Kim, K., Second Law Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Triple Power Cycle, Energy Conv. Man., 2002, vol. 43, pp. 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sue, D. and Chaung, C., Engineering Design and Energy for Combustion Gas Turbine Based Power Generation System, Energy, 2004, vol. 29, pp. 1183–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aljundi, I.H., Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Steam Power Plant in Jordan, Appl. Thermal Eng., 2009, vol. 29, pp. 324–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kotas, T.J., The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis, US: Krieger, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cengel, Y.A. and Boles, M.A., Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 7th ed., US: Mc-Graw Hill, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Khaldi, F. and Adouane, B., Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Gas Turbine Power Plant Algeria, Int. J. Exergy, 10.1504/IJEX.2011.043920.

  17. 17.

    Nieto, R., Gonzalez, C., Lopez, J., and Jimenez, A., Efficiency of a Standard Gas-Turbine Power Generation Cycle Running on Different Fuels, Int. J. Exergy, 10.1504/IJEX.2011.041433.

  18. 18.

    Alasfour, F.N., Al-Fahed, S.F., and Abdulrahim, H.K., The Effect of Elevated Inlet Air Temperature and Relative Humidity on Gas Turbine Cogeneration System: Exergy Assessment, Int. J. Exergy, 10.1504/IJEX.2011.039789.

  19. 19.

    Farshad, A., Shams, M., and Behbahani-nia, A., Sensitivity Analysis and Thermo-Economic Optimization of Steam Injected Gas Turbine Cycle Design Parameters, Int. J. Exergy, 10.1504/IJEX.2011.039791.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. S. Najjar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Najjar, Y.S., Al-Absi, S. Exergy analysis for greener gas turbine engine arrangements. J. Engin. Thermophys. 22, 247–256 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232813030090

Download citation

Keywords

  • Combustion Chamber
  • Pressure Ratio
  • Engineer THERMOPHYSICS
  • Exergy Analysis
  • Exergy Loss