Abstract
The performance of the upstream moderator for neutron beams 1, 4, 5, 6, and 9 extracted from the IBR-2 reactor is simulated towards selecting its optimum configuration. For different moderator options, gain factors with respect to the existing comb-shaped water moderator are computed. Taking into account the technological issues in manufacturing a combined moderator, the scheme with optimal physical characteristics is selected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Kulikov and E. Shabalin, “Complex of neutron moderators for the IBR-2M reactor,” in Proceedings of the 17th Meeting of the International Collaboration on Advanced NeutronSources, ICANS-XVII, April 25–29, 2005, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
V. D. Anan’ev, A. A. Belyakov, M. B. Bulavin, A. E. Verkhoglyadov, C. A. Kulikov, K. A. Mukhin, and E. P. Shabalin, “Cold neutron moderator on an upgraded IBR-2 reactor: the first set of results,” Tech. Phys. 59, 283 (2014).
Joint Inst. Nuclear Researches, Frank Neutron Physics Laboratory. http://flnph.jinr.ru/ru/facilities/ibr-2/ instruments.
N. A. Gundorin and V. M. Nazarov, “Effective moderator for pulse neutron sources,” JINR Preprint R-3-80-721 (JINR, Dubna, 1980).
M. B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky, et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data,” Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887–2996 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © K.A. Mukhin, A.D. Rogov, 2018, published in Pis’ma v Zhurnal Fizika Elementarnykh Chastits i Atomnogo Yadra, 2018.
In memory of V. D. Anan’ev
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukhin, K.A., Rogov, A.D. Optimization and Comparing a Different Various of Head Part of a Moderator of “Central” Direction for IBR-2 Reactor. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 15, 174–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477118020103
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477118020103