Abstract
The Monte Carlo model for the photon-beam output from the Varian Clinac 2100 linear accelerator was validated to compare the calculated to measured PDD and beam dose profiles The Monte Carlo calculation method is considered to be the most accurate method for dose calculation in radiotherapy. The objective of this study is to build a Monte Carlo geometry of Varian Clinac 2100 linear accelerator as realistically as possible. The Monte Carlo codes used in this work were the BEAMnrc code to simulate the photons beam and the DOSXYZnrc code to examinate the absorbed dose in the water phantom. We have calculated percentage depth dose (PDD) and beam profiles of the 6 MV photon beam for the 6 × 6 cm2, 10 × 10 cm2 and 15 × 15 cm2 field sizes. We have used the gamma index technique for the quantitative evaluation to compare the measured and calculated distributions. Good agreement was found between calculated PDD and beam profile compared to measured data. The comparison was evaluated using the gamma index method and the criterions were 3% for dose difference and 3 mm for distance to agreement. The gamma index acceptance rate was more than 97% of both distribution comparisons PDDs and dose profiles and our results were more developed and accurate. The Varian Clinac 2100 linear accelerator was accurately modeled using Monte Carlo codes: BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc codes package.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Mayles, A. Nahum, and J. C. Rosenwald, Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics Theory and Practice (Taylor Francis Group, USA, 2007), pp. 452–480.
D. S. Chang, F. D. Lasley, I. J. Das, M. S. Mendonca, and J. R. Dynlacht, Basic Radiotherapy Physics and Biology (Springer, New York, 2014), pp. 77–92.
E. B. Podgorsak, Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students (IAEA, Vienna, 2005), pp. 161–216.
S. Jayaraman and L. H. Lanzl, Clinical Radiotherapy Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 189–229.
E. B. Podgorsak, Radiation Physics for Medical Physicists (Springer, Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 277–374.
International Atomic Energy Agency, “Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy,” Tech. Rep. Ser., No. 398 (Vienna, 2000), pp. 110–133.
D. W. O. Rogers, B. Walters, and I. Kawrakow, “BEAMnrc users manual,” NRCC Report (Ottawa, 2013), pp. 12–254.
B. Walters, I. Kawrakow, and D. W. O. Rogers, “DOSXYZnrc users manual,” NRCC Report (Ottawa, 2013), pp. 9–103.
D. W. O. Rogers, I. Kawrakow, J. P. Seuntjens, B. Walters, and H. E. Mainegra, “NRC user codes for EGSnrc,” NRCC Report (Ottawa, 2013), pp. 6–83.
H. C. E. McGowan, B. A. Faddegon, and C. M. Ma, STATDOSE for 3D Dose Distributions (Natl. Res. Council of Canada, Ottawa, 2013), pp. 5–10.
R. Popa, M. Dumitrache, and A. Ciovlica, “A comparative study on 6 MV photon beam percentage depth dose of VARIAN clinac 2300 C/D, ELEKTA synergy platform, and Siemens primus linacs,” Roman. Rep. Phys. 64, 997–1010 (2012).
A. Mesbahi, M. Fix, M. Allahverdi, E. Grein, and H. Garaati, “Monte Carlo calculation of varian 2300 C/D linac photon beam characteristics: a comparison between MCNP4C, GEANT3 and measurements,” Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 62, 469–477 (2005).
L. Apipunyasopon, S. Srisatit, and N. Phaisangittisakul, “An investigation of the depth dose in the buildup region, and surface dose for a 6 MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements,” J. Radiat. Res. 54, 374–382 (2013).
D. A. Low, W. B. Harms, S. Mutic, and J. A. Purdy, “A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions,” Med. Phys. 25, 656–661 (1998).
K. F. Michael, J. K. Paul, and V. S. Jeffrey, “Photonbeam subsource sensitivity to the initial electron-beam parameters,” Med. Phys. 32, 1164–1175 (2005).
K. Aljarrah, G. C. Sharp, T. Neicu, and S. B. Jiang, “Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation,” Med. Phys. 33, 850–858 (2006).
M. Asghar, M. Parinaz, K. Ahmad, and F. Alireza, “Dosimetric properties of a flattening filter-free 6-MV photon beam: a Monte Carlo study,” Radiat. Med. 25, 315–324 (2007).
A. Mesbahi, “Development a simple point source model for elekta SL-25 linear accelerator using MCNP4C Monte Carlo code,” Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 4, 7–14 (2006).
D. Sheikh-Bagheri and D. W. Rogers, “Sensitivity of megavoltage photon beam Monte Carlo simulations to electron beam and other parameters,” Med. Phys. 29, 379–390 (2002).
M. Oprea, C. Constantin, D. Mihailescu, and C. Borcia, “A Monte Carlo investigation of the influence of initial electron beam characteristics on the absorbed dose distributions obtained with a 9 MeV IORT accelerator,” U.P. B. Sci. Bull., Ser. A 74, 153–166 (2012).
F. Verhaegen and J. Seuntjens, “Monte Carlo modelling of external radiotherapy photon beams,” Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 3401–3458 (2003).
O. Chibani, B. Moftah, and C. M. Ma, “On Monte Carlo modeling of megavoltage photon beams: a revisited study on the sensitivity of beam parameters,” Med. Phys. 38, 188–201 (2011).
R. Mohan, C. Chui, and L. Lidofsky, “Energy and angular distributions of photons from medical linear accelerators,” Med. Phys. 12, 592–590 (1985).
E. L. Chaney, T. J. Cullip, and T. A. Gabriel, “A Monte Carlo study of accelerator head scatter,” Med. Phys. 21, 1383–1390 (1994).
D. M. Lovelock, C. S. Chui, and R. Mohan, “A Monte Carlo model of photon beams used in radiation therapy,” Med. Phys. 22, 1387–1394 (1995).
H. H. Liu, T. R. Mackie, and E. C. McCullough, “A dual source photon beam model used in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical megavoltage X-ray beams,” Med. Phys. 24, 1960–1974 (1997).
B. Libby, J. Siebers, and R. Mohan, “Validation of Monte Carlo generated phase-space descriptions of medical linear accelerators,” Med. Phys. 26, 1476–1483 (1999).
C. M. Ma, E. Mok, A. Kapur, T. Pawlicki, D. Findley, S. Brain, K. Forster, and A. L. Boyer, “Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system,” Med. Phys. 26, 2133–2143 (1999).
A. E. Schach von Wittenau, L. J. Cox, P. M. Bergstrom, W. P. Chandler, C. L. Hartmann Siantar, and R. Mohan, “Correlated histogram representation of Monte Carlo derived medical accelerator photon-output phase space,” Med. Phys. 26, 1196–2110 (1999).
J. V. Siebers, P. J. Keall, B. Libby, and R. Mohan, “Comparison of EGS4 and MCNP4b Monte Carlo codes for generation of photon phase space distributions for a varian 2100C,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 3009–3026 (1999).
I. Chetty, J. J. DeMarco, and T. D. Solberg, “A virtual source model for Monte Carlo modeling of arbitrary intensity distributions,” Med. Phys. 27, 166–172 (2000).
S. B. Jiang, A. Kapur, J. Li, T. Pawlicki, and C. M. Ma, “Photon beam characterization and modelling for Monte Carlo treatment planning,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 411–427 (2000).
W. van der Zee and J. Welleweerd, “Calculating photon beam characteristics with Monte Carlo techniques,” Med. Phys. 26, 1883–1892 (1999).
C. M. Ma, “Characterization of computer simulated radiotherapy beams for Monte-Carlo treatment planning,” Radiat. Phys. Chem. 53, 329–344 (1998).
M. K. Fix, H. Keller, P. Ruegsegger, and E. J. Born, “Simple beam models for Monte Carlo photon beam dose calculations in radiotherapy,” Med. Phys. 27, 2739–2747 (2000).
M. K. Fix, M. Stampanoni, P. Manser, E. J. Born, R. Mini, and P. Ruegsegger, “A multiple source model for 6 MV photon beam dose calculations using Monte Carlo,” Phys. Med. Biol. 46, 1407–1427 (2001).
M. K. Fix, P. Manser, E. J. Born, R. Mini, and P. Ruegsegger, “Monte Carlo simulation of a dynamic MLC based on a multiple source model,” Phys. Med. Biol. 46, 3241–3257 (2001).
M. K. Fix, P. J. Keall, K. Dawson, and J. V. Siebers, “Monte Carlo source model for photon beam radiotherapy: photon source characteristics,” Med. Phys. 31, 3106–3121 (2004).
A. E. Schach von Wittenau, P. M. Bergstrom, and L. J. Cox, “Patient dependent beam-modifier physics in Monte Carlo photon dose calculations,” Med. Phys. 27, 935–947 (2000).
C. L. Hartmann Siantar, R. S. Walling, T. P. Daly, B. Faddegon, N. Albright, P. Bergstrom, A. F. Bielajew, C. Chuang, D. Garrett, R. K. House, D. Knapp, D. J. Wieczorek, and L. J. Verhey, “Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom,” Med. Phys. 28, 1322–1337 (2001).
P. Francescon, C. Cavedon, S. Reccanello, and S. Cora, “Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM,” Med. Phys. 27, 1579–1587 (2000).
D. Sheikh-Bagheri and D. W. Rogers, “Monte Carlo calculation of ninemegavoltage photon beam spectra using the BEAM code,” Med. Phys. 29, 391–402 (2002).
P. J. Keall, J. V. Siebers, B. Libby, and R. Mohan, “Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set,” Med. Phys. 30, 574–582 (2003).
R. D. Lewis, S. J. Ryde, D. A. Hancock, and C. J. Evans, “An MCNP-based model of a linear accelerator X-ray beam,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 1219–1230 (1999).
B. T. Sichani and M. Sohrabpour, “Monte Carlo dose calculations for radiotherapy machines: theratron 780-C teletherapy case study,” Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 807–818 (2004).
M. Dumitrache and A. Tanase, “A comparative study on 6 MV photon beam percentage depth dose of VARIAN clinac 2300 C/D, ELEKTA synergy platform, and Siemens primus linacs,” in Proceedings of the European Medical Physics and Engineering Conference, Sofia, October 18–20, 2012.
R. Popa, M. Dumitrache, and A. Ciovlica, “A comparative study on 6 mV photon beam percentage depth dose of VARIAN clinac 2300 C/D, ELEKTA synergy platform, and Siemens primus linacs,” Roman. Rep. Phys. 64, 997–1010 (2012).
A. Mesbahi, P. Mehnati, and A. Keshtkar, “A comparative Monte Carlo study on 6 MV photon beam characteristics of VARIAN 21EX and ELEKTA SL-25 linacs,” Iron. J. Radiat. Res. 5, 23–30 (2007).
A. Mesbahi, M. Fix, M. Allahverdi, E. Grein, and H. Garaati, “Monte Carlo calculation of varian 2300 C/D linac photon beam characteristics: a comparison between MCNP4C, GEANT3 and measurements,” Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 62, 469–477 (2005).
L. Grevillot, T. Frisson, D. Maneval, N. Zahra, J.-N. Badel, and D. Sarrut, “Simulation of a 6 MV elekta precise linac photon beam using GATE/GEANT4,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 903–918 (2011).
J. El Bakkali and T. El Bardouni, “Validation of Monte Carlo Geant4 code for a 6 MV varian linac,” J. King Saud Univ., Sci. 29, 106–113 (2017).
Y. Tayalati, S. Didi, M. Zerfaoui, and A. Moussaa, “Monte Carlo simulation of 6MV elekta synergy platform linac photon beam using Gate/Geant4,” arXiv:13090758 (2013).
S. Didi, A. Moussa, Y. Tayalati, and M. Zerfaoui, “Simulation of the 6 MV elekta synergy platform linac photon beam using Geant4 application for tomographic emission,” J. Med. Phys. 40, 136–143 (2015).
D. A. Low and J. F. Dempsey, “Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method,” Med. Phys. 30, 2455–2464 (2003).
X. D. George, “Energy spectra, angular spread, fluence profiles and dose distributions of 6 and 18 MV photon beams: results of Monte Carlo simulations for a varian 2100EX accelerator,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 1025–1046 (2002).
M. Aljamal and A. Zakaria, “Monte Carlo modeling of a siemens primus 6 MV photon beam linear accelerator,” Austral. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7, 340–346 (2013).
J. Palta, S. Kim, J. Li, and C. Liu, “Tolerance limits and action levels for planning and delivery of IMRT,” in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The State of the Art, Ed. by J. R. Palta, T. Rockwell Mackie, and Zhe Chen, AAPM Medical Physics Monograph No. 29 (AAPM, 2003).
B. Kadman, N. Chawapun, S. Ua-apisitwong, T. Asakit, N. Chumpu, and J. Rueansri, “Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 694, 012023 (2016).
“Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer,” IAEA Tech. Rep. Ser., No. 430 (Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2004).
“Specification and acceptance testing of radiotherapy treatment planning systems,” IAEA-TECDOC-1540 (Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2007).
B. Poppe, A. Ruehmann, K. Willborn, B. Allgaier, and D. Harder, “Three dimensional gamma-index analysis and considerations of the reference level definition for dosimetric IMRT plan verification with 2D ionisation chamber arrays,” in Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7–12, 2009, Münich, Germany, Vol. 25/1: Radiation Oncology, Ed. by O. Dössel and W. C. Schlegel (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 248–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bencheikh, M., Maghnouj, A., Tajmouati, J. et al. Validation of Monte Carlo simulation of 6 MV photon beam produced by Varian Clinac 2100 linear accelerator using BEAMnrc code and DOSXYZnrc code. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 14, 780–787 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S154747711705003X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S154747711705003X