Advertisement

Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 43–47 | Cite as

Experimental tests of the modernized VASSILISSA separator (SHELS) with the use of accelerated 50Ti ions

  • A. V. YereminEmail author
  • A. G. Popeko
  • O. N. Malyshev
  • B. Gall
  • Z. Asfari
  • A. Lopez-Martens
  • K. Hauschild
  • O. Dorvaux
  • B. N. Gikal
  • S. L. Bogomolov
  • V. N. Loginov
  • A. E. Bondarchenko
  • V. I. Chepigin
  • A. I. Svirikhin
  • A. V. Isaev
  • E. A. Sokol
  • M. L. Chelnokov
  • A. N. Kuznetsov
  • A. A. Kuznetsova
  • Yu. A. Popov
  • K. Rezynkina
  • F. Dechery
  • B. Andel
  • S. Hofmann
  • J. Maurer
  • S. Heinz
  • J. Rubert
Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei. Experiment

Abstract

A high intensity ion beam of 50Ti ions was obtained using the ECR ion source on the U400 cyclotron. The experimental tests using accelerated 50Ti ions were performed with a modernized VASSILISSA separator (SHELS). Data has been obtained on the transmission coefficients of recoil nuclei synthesized in complete fusion reactions. Estimates from ion optical calculations performed in the design phase of the project of modernizing the separator are completely confirmed.

Keywords

208Pb Production Cross Section Nucleus Letter Electron Cyclotron Resonance Evaporation Residue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. Ts. Oganessian, F. Sh. Abdullin, S. N. Dmitriev, J. M. Gostic, J. H. Hamilton, R. A. Henderson, M. G. Itkis, K. J. Moody, A. N. Polyakov, A. V. Ramayya, J. B. Roberto, K. P. Rykaczewski, R. N. Sagaidak, D. A. Shaughnessy, I. V. Shirokovsky, M. A. Stoyer, N. J. Stoyer, V. G. Subbotin, A. M. Sukhov, Yu. S. Tsyganov, V. K. Utyonkov, A. A. Voinov, and G. K. Vostokin, “Investigation of the 243Am + 48Ca reaction products previously observed in the experiments on elements 113, 115, and 117,” Phys. Rev. C 87, 014302–10 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. Ts. Oganessian, F. Sh. Abdullin, C. Alexander, J. Binder, R. A. Boll, S. N. Dmitriev, J. Ezold, K. Felker, J. M. Gostic, R. K. Grzywacz, J. H. Hamilton, R. A. Henderson, M. G. Itkis, K. Miernik, D. Miller, K. J. Moody, A. N. Polyakov, A. V. Ramayya, J. B. Roberto, M. A. Ryabinin, K. P. Rykaczewski, R. N. Sagaidak, D. A. Shaughnessy, I. V. Shirokovsky, M. V. Shumeiko, M. A. Stoyer, N. J. Stoyer, V. G. Subbotin, A. M. Sukhov, Yu. S. Tsyganov, V. K. Utyonkov, A. A. Voinov, and G. K. Vostokin, “Experimental studies of the 249Bk + 48Ca reaction including decay properties and excitation function for isotopes of element 117, and discovery of the new isotope 277Mt,” Phys. Rev. C 87, 054621–10 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. Ts. Oganessian, “Heaviest nuclei from 48Ca- induced reactions,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34, R165–R242 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. B. Kutner, S. L. Bogomolov, A. A. Efremov, A. N. Lebedev, V. Ya. Lebedev, V. N. Loginov, A. B. Yakushev, and N. Yu. Yazvitsky, “Production of intense 48Ca ion beam at the U-400 cyclotron,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(2), 860–862 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Bogomolov, V. B. Bekhterev, A. A. Efremov, B. Gikal, G. G. Gulbekyan, Yu. K. Kostyukhov, N. Lebedev, V. N. Loginov, and Yu. Yazvitsky, “Recent development in ECR sources at FLNR JINR,” in Proc. RUPAC2012, St. Petersburg, 2012, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/rupac2012/html/author.htm
  6. 6.
    S. Hofmann, S. Heinz, D. Ackermann, S. Antalic, W. Barth, H. G. Burkhard, V. F. Comas, L. Dahl, K. Eberhardt, J. Gostic, R. Grzywacz, R. A. Henderson, J. A. Heredia, F. P. Hesberger, J. M. Kenneally, B. Kindler, I. Kojouharov, R. Lang, M. Leino, B. Lommel, R. Mann, J. Maurer, K. Miernik, D. Miller, K. J. Moody, G. Munzenberg, S. L. Nelson, K. Nishio, A. G. Popeko, J. B. Roberto, J. Runke, K. P. Rykaczewski, S. Saro, D. A. Shaughnessy, M. A. Stoyer, P. Thorle-Pospiech, K. Tinschert, N. Trautmann, J. Uusitalo, P. A. Wilk, and A. V. Yeremin, “Attempts for the synthesis of new elements at SHIP,” GSI Sci. Rep., 205 (2011).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu. Ts. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, Yu. V. Lobanov, F. Sh. Abdullin, A. N. Polyakov, R. N. Sagaidak, I. V. Shirokovsky, Yu. S. Tsyganov, A. A. Voinov, A. N. Mezentsev, V. G. Subbotin, A. M. Sukhov, K. Subotic, V. I. Zagrebaev, and S. N. Dmitriev, “Attempt to produce element 120 in the 244Pu + 58Fe reaction,” Phys. Rev. C 79, 024603–4 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Hofmann, D. Ackermann, S. Antalic, V. F. Comas, S. Heinz, J. A. Heredia, F. P. Hesberger, J. Khuyagbaatar, B. Kindler, I. Kojouharov, M. Leino, B. Lommel, R. Mann, K. Nishio, A. G. Popeko, S. Saro, J. Uusitalo, M. Venhart, and A. V. Yeremin, “Probing shell effects at Z = 120 and N = 184,” GSI Sci. Rep., 131 (2008).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Koivisto, J. Ärje, R. Seppala, and M. Nurmia, “Production of titanium ion beams in An ECR ion source,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 187, 111–116 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. V. Yeremin, A. G. Popeko, O. N. Malyshev, A. Lopez-Martens, K. Khoshil’d, O. Dorvo, B. Gall, V. I. Chepigin, A. I. Svirikhin, A. V. Isaev, E. A. Sokol, M. L. Chelnokov, A. N. Kuznetsov, A. A. Kuznetsova, A. V. Belozerov, K. Rezinkina, F. Desheri, BlankF. Le, Zh. Pio, Dzh. Gelot, D. Tonev, E. Stefanova, D. Pantelika, K. Nita, B. Andel, S. Mulins, P. Dzhons, and S. Ntshangaze, “The first experimental tests of the modernized VASSILISSA separator,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. (2015) (in press).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Isaev, A. V. Yeremin, N. I. Zamyatin, A. N. Kuznetsov, O. N. Malyshev, A. I. Svirikhin, M. L. Chelnokov, V. I. Chepigin, K. Hauschild, A. Lopez-Martens, and O. Dorvaux “Application of a double-sided stripped Si in the focal plane of the VASSILISSA separator,” Instrum. Exp.Tech. 54(1), 37 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. V. Karpov, A. S. Denikin, V. I. Zagrebaev, and A. P. Alekseev, Statistical Model Code of NRV, http://nrv.jinr.ru/.
  13. 13.
    S. Hofmann, V. Ninov, F. P. Hessberger, P. Armbruster, H. Folger, G. Munzenberg, H. J. Shott, A. G. Popeko, A. V. Yeremin, A. N. Andreyev, S. Sharo, R. Janik, and M. Leino, “Production and decay of 269110,” Z. Phys. A 350, 277–280 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. G. Popeko, O. N. Malyshev, R. N. Sagaidak, and A. V. Yeremin, “Monte-Carlo simulation of ion trajectories in kinematic recoil separator VASSILISSA,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 126, 294–296 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    GICOSY Ion Optics Program, http://www-linux.gsi.de/~weick/gicosy/.
  16. 16.
    A. I. Svirikhin, A. V. Isaev, A. V. Yeremin, A. N. Kuznetsov, O. N. Malyshev, A. G. Popeko, E. A. Sokol, M. L. Chelnokov, and V. I. Chepigin, “A detector for studying the characteristics of spontaneous fission of short-lived heavy nuclei,” Instrum. Exp. Tech 54(5), 644 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Yeremin
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. G. Popeko
    • 1
  • O. N. Malyshev
    • 1
  • B. Gall
    • 2
  • Z. Asfari
    • 2
  • A. Lopez-Martens
    • 3
  • K. Hauschild
    • 3
  • O. Dorvaux
    • 2
  • B. N. Gikal
    • 1
  • S. L. Bogomolov
    • 1
  • V. N. Loginov
    • 1
  • A. E. Bondarchenko
    • 1
  • V. I. Chepigin
    • 1
  • A. I. Svirikhin
    • 1
  • A. V. Isaev
    • 1
  • E. A. Sokol
    • 1
  • M. L. Chelnokov
    • 1
  • A. N. Kuznetsov
    • 1
  • A. A. Kuznetsova
    • 1
  • Yu. A. Popov
    • 1
  • K. Rezynkina
    • 2
  • F. Dechery
    • 3
  • B. Andel
    • 4
  • S. Hofmann
    • 5
  • J. Maurer
    • 5
  • S. Heinz
    • 5
  • J. Rubert
    • 6
  1. 1.Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear ReactionsJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaRussia
  2. 2.Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert CURIENIN2P3-CNRSStrasbourgFrance
  3. 3.Centre de Sciences Nucléaires et de Sciences de la MatièreIN2P3-CNRSOrsay CampusFrance
  4. 4.Comenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia
  5. 5.GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion ResearchDarmstadtGermany
  6. 6.Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de CosmologieGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations