Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of the opening between the heads of the two closest pyramids in textured surface for solar cells and its application on the spectral response

  • Methods of Physical Experiment
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work presented in this study is concerned the development of a new solar cell prototype in order to improve photovoltaic efficiency In this model we show that the material can have five and more successive incident ray absorptions instead of three currently, where we changed the direction of the reflected ray, by varying the angle between the two neighbouring pyramids, the incidence angle, the opening between the heads of the two closest pyramids and their height. Thus, with an angle between the two neighbouring pyramid varying between 24° and 12° and for angle of incidence varying between 78° and 84°. For these values of the angle between the two neighbouring pyramids and incidence angle, the opening between the heads of the two closest pyramids varied respectively from 4.25 to 2.10 μm for a pyramid height of 10 μm. This lead to a substantial increase of the spectral response and the photovoltaic efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. A. Dobrzański and A. Drygała, “Surface texturing of multicrystalline silicon solar cells,” Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 31, 77–81 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Lipinski, P. Zieba, and A. Kaminski, “Crystalline silicon solar cells,” in Foundation of Materials Design (Research Signpost, 2006), pp. 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. K. Ferry and J. P. Bird, Electronic Materials and Devices (San Academic Press, Diego, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. E. Hummel, Electronic Properties of Materials (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Fornies, C. Zaldo, and J. M. Albella, “Control of random texture of monocrystalline silicon cells by angle-resolved optical reflectance,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 87, 583–593 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. Gonsalvez and R. M. Nieminen, “Surface morphology during anisotropic wet chemical etching of crystalline silicon,” New Journal of Physics 5, 100.1–100.28 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. D. Hylton, A. R. Burgers, and W. C. Sinke, “Alkaline etching for reflectance reduction in multicrystalline silicon solar cells,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society 151, 408–427 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Nijs, S. Sivoththaman, J. Szlufcik, K. De Clercq, F. Duerinckx, E. Van Kerschaever, R. Einhaus, J. Poortmans, T. Vermeulen, and R. Mertens, “Overview of solar cell technologies and results on high efficiency multicrystalline silicon substrates,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 48, 199–217 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Seidel, L. Csepregi, A. Heuberger, and H. Baumgartel, “Anisotropic etching of crystalline silicon in alkaline solution,” in Orientation Dependence and Behavior of Passivation Layers, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 137/11, 3612–3626 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Panek, M. Lipiski, and J. Dutkiewicz, “Texturization of multicrystalline silicon by wet chemical etching for silicon solar cells,” Journal of Materials Science 40/6, 1459–1463 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Y. Yerokhov, R. Hezel, M. Lipinski, R. Ciach, H. Nagel, A. Mylyanych, and P. Panek, “Cost-effective methods of texturing for silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 72, 291–298 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Fukui, Y. Inomata, and K. Shirasawa, “Surface texturing using reactive ion etching for multicrystalline silicon solar cell,” in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC’97 (Anaheim, 1997), pp. 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Fath, C. Marckmann, E. Bucher, and G. Willeke, “Multicrystalline silicon solar cells using a new high throughput mechanical texturization technology and a roller printing metallization technique,” in Proceedings of the 13th European PV Solar Energy Conference (Nice, 1995), pp. 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Gerhards, C. Marckmann, R. Tolle, M. Spiegel, P. Fath, and G. Willeke, “Mechanically V-textured low cost multicrystalline silicon solar cells with a novel printing metallization,” in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC’97 (Anaheim, 1997), pp. 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. B. Rudenberg, “High efficiency silicon solar cells,” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Power Sources Conference. U.S. Army Signal Research and Development Lab, 1960, p. 22.

  16. J. A. W. Zhao, A. W. X. Dai, M. A. Green, and S. R. Wenham, “Improvements in silicon solar cell performance,” in Proceedings of 22nd IEEE PV Specialists Conference, 1991, pp. 399–402.

  17. S. R. Wenham and M. A. Green, Buried Contact Solar Cell, http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4726850.html.

  18. J. C. Zolper, S. Narayanan, S. R. Wenham, and M. A. Green, “16.7% efficient, laser textured, buried contact polycrystalline silicon solar cell,” Applied Physics Letters 55, 2363 (1989), http://apl.aip.org/applab/v55/i22/p2363-s1.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. C. Baker-Finch, K. R. McIntosh, and M. L. Terry, “Isotextured silicon solar cell analysis and modeling 1: optics,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2(4), 457–464 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Campbell and M. A. Green, “Light trapping properties of pyramidally textured surfaces,” Journal of Applied Physics 62,(1), 243 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Campbell and M. A. Green, “High performance light trapping textures for monocrystalline silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 65(1–4), 369–375 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Ricaud, Photopiles Solaires (Presses Polytechnique et Universitaires Romandes, 1997), pp. 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Hamel, B. Hadjoudja, and A. Chibani, “Possible improvement of solar cell efficiency,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 7(4), 281–284 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hamel.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamel, A. The influence of the opening between the heads of the two closest pyramids in textured surface for solar cells and its application on the spectral response. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 11, 282–285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477114030091

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477114030091

Keywords

Navigation