Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of the entrance channel on the formation and decay of the compound nucleus 250No

  • Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei. Experiment
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mass-energy and angular distributions of binary fissionlike fragments produced in the reactions 44Ca + 206Pb and 64Ni + 186W, leading to the same compound nucleus 250No, have been measured at excitation energies of 30 and 40 MeV. The presence of the quasifission component was observed for both systems. But in the case of the 64Ni ion, the quasifission process dominates, while in the case of the 44Ca ion, the main process is the fusion-fission of compound nucleus 250No. From the angular distributions of reaction fragments, the time scales were found for quasifission and fusion-fission for both reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. Ts. Oganessian et al., “Synthesis of the Isotopes of Elements 118 and 116 in the 249Cf and 245Cm + 48Ca Fusion Reactions,” Phys. Rev. C 74, 044602 (2006).

  2. S. Hofman and G. Munzenberg, “The Discovery of the Heaviest Elements,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 733 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bock et al., “Dynamics of the Fusion Process,” Nucl. Phys. A 388, 334 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Toke et al., “Quasi-Fission—the Mass-Drift Mode in Heavy-Ion Reactions,” Nucl. Phys. A 440, 327 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Q. Shen et al., “Fission and Quasifission in U-Induced Reactions,” Phys. Rev. C 36, 115 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. G. Itkis et al., “Shell Effects in Fission and Quasi-Fission of Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 734, 136 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Royer and B. Remaundm, “Static and Dynamic Fusion Barriers in the Heavy-Ion Reaction,” Nucl. Phys. A 444, 477 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Yu. Chizov et al., “Unexpected Entrance-Channel Effects in the Fission of 216Ra,” Phys. Rev. C 67, R011603 (2003).

  9. C. C. Sahm et al., “Fusion Probability of Symmetric Heavy, Nuclear Systems Determined from Evaporation-Residue Cross Sections,” Nucl. Phys. A 441, 316 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. L. Hahn et al., “Reactions with 40Ar and 84Kr Leading to the Same Compound Nucleus, 200Po,” Phys. Rev. C 36, 2132 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. J. Pacheco et al., “Capture Reactions in the 40,48Ca + 197Au and 40,48Ca + 208Pb System,” Phys. Rev. C 45, 2861 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. A. Kondratiev et al., “A Double-Arm Time-of-Flight Microchannel Plate Spectrometer CORSET for Correlation Measurement of Fission Fragments and Medium Mass Heavy Ions,” in Dynamical Aspects of Nuclear Fission: Proc. of 4th Intern. Conf., Casta-Papiernicka, 1998 (WS, Singapore, 1999), p. 431.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, and C. Thibault, “The 2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation. Tables, Graphs, and References,” Nucl. Phys. A 729, 337 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Hagino, N. Rowley, and A. T. Kruppa, “A Program for Coupled-Channel Calculations with All Order Couplings for Heavy-Ion Fusion Reactions,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 123, 143 (1999).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. Nix, “Further Studies in the Liquid-Drop Theory on Nuclear Fission,” Nucl. Phys. A 130, 241 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. D. Adeev and V. V. Pashkevich, “Theory of Macroscopic Fission Dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. A 502, 405 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. U. Brosa, S. Grossman, and A. Muller, “Nuclear Scission,” Phys. Rep. 197, 167 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. V. E. Viola, K. Kwiatkowski, and M. Walker, “Systematics of Fission Fragment Total Kinetic Energy Release,” Phys. Rev. C 31, 3550 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Patyk, R. Smolanczuk, and A. Sobiczewski, “Masses and Shapes of Heaviest Nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 626, 337 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Halpern and V. M. Strutinski, “Angular Distributions in Particle-Induced Fission at Medium Energies,” in Proc. of the Second UN Intern. Conf. on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (Switzerland, Genewa, 1958), p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. B. Back et al., “Entrance-Channel Effects in Quasifission Reactions,” Phys. Rev. C 53, 1734 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. W. P. Zank et al., “Fusion-Fission Dynamics at High Excitation Energies Studied by Neutron Emission,” Phys. Rev. C 33, 519 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. J. Hinde et al., “Neutron Multiplicities in Heavy-Ion-Induced Fission: Timescale of Fusion-Fission,” Nucl. Phys. A 452, 550 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. D. C. Hoffman et al., “Spontaneous Fission Properties of 2.9-s 256No,” Phys. Rev. C 41, 631 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. K. Hulet, “Role of the Second Barrier upon Mass Division in the Spontaneous Fission of the Heaviest Elements,” Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 1165 (1994) [Phys. Atomic Nuclei 57, 1099 (1994)].

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. P. Unik et al., in Proc. of Symp. Physics and Chemistry of Fission, IAEA (Vienna, 1974), Vol. 2, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. G. Itkis and A. Ya. Rusanov, “Fission of Heated Nuclei in Reactions with Heavy Ions: Statistical and Dynamical Aspects,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 29, 389 (1998) [Phys. Part. Nuclei 29, 160 (1998)].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © G.N. Knyazheva, M.G. Itkis, S.V. Khlebnikov, E.M. Kozulin, V.G. Lyapin, V.A. Rubchenya, W. Trzaska, 2008, published in Pis’ma v Zhurnal Fizika Elementarnykh Chastits i Atomnogo Yadra, 2008, No. 1 (143), pp. 40–52.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knyazheva, G.N., Itkis, M.G., Khlebnikov, S.V. et al. The influence of the entrance channel on the formation and decay of the compound nucleus 250No. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 5, 21–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477108010044

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477108010044

PACS numbers

Navigation