Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Assessment Indicators for Russia’s Demographic Security

  • SOCIAL ASPECTS
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract—

The article considers the issues of creating assessment indicators for national demographic security for the purposes of governance decision-making. The result of the study is the calculation of a generalized indicator that characterizes the status of demographic security of the Russian Federation based on statistical data and querying 40 experts. The values established for the indicator for the period 2000–2021 are negative (with the exception of 2008–2012), which is associated with a low birth rate and negative influence of other factors on the demographic situation in Russia. Factor analysis of changes of the generalized demographic indicator for the beginning of the period of improvement of its values (2007–2008) confirms this conclusion. A target value for the indicator is proposed and substantiated; it can be used for comparison with estimates of actual values and for factor analysis that aims to identify main obstacles to achieving that target value. The presented calculations of demographic security assessment are an example application of the proposed methodology, which can be used to calculate generalized indicators for any area of Russia’s national security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 13, 2017, no. 208.

  2. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated July 21, 2020, no. 474.

  3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated July 02, 2021, no. 400.

REFERENCES

  1. M. A. Klupt, “Concerns of the 21st century: Mechanisms of influence on fertility,” Sots. Issled., No. 5, 25–35 (2022). .https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250018464-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O. A. Kislitsyna, Measurements of Quality of Life/Well-Being: International Experience (Inst. Ekon. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. N. Yuzhakov, “Public administration by results: A model for Russia,” Vopr. Gos. Munits. Upr., No. 2, 165–174 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Nagimova, Efficiency of Activity of Public Authorities as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Life in the Region: Problems of Assessment and Measurement (Kazan. Gos. Univ., Kazan, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. N. Rozanova, “Integral indicator of the effectiveness of regional authorities: A reputational approach,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Sotsiol. Ekon. Politika, No. 3, 25–33 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. E. Markova, “Assessment of the socio-economic development of Sakhalin oblast,” Finans. Ekon., No. 9, 121–125 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Katyn’, “Integral assessment of federal districts according to the degree of penetration of information and communication technologies into various fields of activity,” Mpd. Econ. Success, No. 5, 224–232 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. N. Yashin, O. S. Boronin, and E. N. Lapshina, “Method of integrated assessment of the level of innovative development of enterprises,” Vestn. Altai. Akad. Ekon. Prava 10 (1), 95–101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. De Smet and L. Montano- Guzmán, “Towards multicriteria clustering: An extension of the k-means algorithm,” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158, 390–398 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. V. Leshchaikina, “Cross-country econometric analysis of the social comfort of living of the population,” Prikl. Ekonometrika 36 (4), 102–117 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Sun, J. Han, P. Zhao, Z. Yin, H. Cheng, and T. Wu, “RankClus: Integrating clustering with ranking for heterogeneous information network analysis,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology (Assoc. Comput. Mach., New York, 2009), pp. 565–576.

  12. F. Aleskerov, H. Ersel, and R. Yolalan, “Multicriterial ranking approach for evaluating bank branch performance,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decision Making 3, 321–335 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962200400101X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. R. Douissa and K. A. Jabeur, “New model for multi-criteria ABC inventory classification: PROAFTN Method,” Procedia Comput. Sci. 96, 550–559 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Ramanathan, “ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization,” Comput. Oper. Res. 33, 695–700 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2004.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. Orlov, “Algorithm for the formation of multicriteria stratification,” Biznes-Inf. 4 (30), 24–35 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. D. Rodríguez and J. A. Lozano, “Multi-objective learning of multi-dimensional Bayesian classifiers,” in Eighth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (IEEE, 2008), pp. 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2008.143

  17. S. A. Aivazyan, “Russia in a cross-country analysis of synthetic categories of the quality of life of the population. Part 1. Methodology of analysis and an example of its application,” Mir Ross. Sotsiol. Etnol., No. 4, 59–96 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. V. Zhgun, “Building an integral characteristic of the quality of life of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation using the method of principal components,” Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tend., Prognoz 10 (2), 214–235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2017.2.50.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. I. L. Avdeeva, N. A. Azarova, O. A. Bazarnova, et al., Theory and Practice of Strategic Management of Economic Systems (Sredneruss. Inst. Upr., Orel, 2021) [in Russian].

  20. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation (McGraw-Hill, London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1, 83–98 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Economic Security of Regions of Russia: Monograph , Ed. by V. K. Senchagov et al. (Nizhegor. Gos. Tekh. Univ., Nizhny Novgorod, 2012) [in Russian].

  23. S. Yu. Glaz’ev, “The basis for ensuring the country’s economic security—An alternative reform course,” Ross. Ekon. Zh., No. 1, 5 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. A. Eskindarov, Institutes for Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Russian Economy: Monograph, Ed. by M. A. Eskindarov and S. N. Sil’vestrov (Dashkov, Moscow, 2022) [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.29030/978-5-394-05222-4-2022

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. A. I. Tatarkin, Socio-Demographic Security of Russia, Ed. by A. I. Tatarkin and V. A. Chereshnev (Instit. Ekon. Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The article is based on the results of state-funded research under a state assignment to the Financial University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167, Moscow, Russia

    V. V. Eremin, S. A. Pobyvaev & S. N. Sil’vestrov

Authors
  1. V. V. Eremin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. A. Pobyvaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. N. Sil’vestrov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Eremin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Ovchinnikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eremin, V.V., Pobyvaev, S.A. & Sil’vestrov, S.N. On Assessment Indicators for Russia’s Demographic Security. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 500–506 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723040056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723040056

Keywords:

Search

Navigation