Skip to main content
Log in

Motives and Incentives for Creative Labor Activity of the Population

  • LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract—

The study is aimed at analyzing the motives and incentives that determine the creative labor activity of the population. In this work, using data from regional sociological monitoring of the qualitative characteristics of the inhabitants of the Vologda oblast, the results of a study of motives and incentives in the context of socio-demographic groups of the population, in the context of population groups that manifest/do not manifest themselves in creative terms, will be presented. Those working in creative professions are distinguished from the rest of the population by a greater propensity for professional growth and professional self-realization, an interest in using a creative approach to work, as well as a manifestation of interest in it. In this regard, they are more often aimed at the development of new knowledge, professional development, the use of new technologies, new values and patterns of behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. B. Kuvalin, T. V. Uskova, Yu. V. Zinchenko, P. A. Lavrinenko, E. V. Lukin, and E. Yu. Shirokova, “General patterns and regional features of the work of Russian enterprises in a pandemic COVID 19,” Ekon. Nauka Sovrem. Ross. 97 (2), 48–59 (2022).

  2. S. V. Terebova and V. N. Borisov, “The development of small innovative business in the industrial, scientific and educational sector in Russia,” Econ. Soc. Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast 12 (3), 55–76 (2019).

  3. A. N. Klepach, L. B. Vodovatov, and E. A. Dmitrieva, “Russian science and technology: Rise or progressive lag (part I),” Studies on Russian Economic Development 33, 631–644 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 1. On the Long-Term Scientific and Technological Development of Russia: Monograph, Ed. by D. R. Belousov and I. E. Frolov (Dinamik Print, Moscow, 2022) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Post-Crisis Recovery of the Economy and the Main Directions of the Forecast of the Socio-Economic Development of Russia for the Period up to 2035: Scientific Report, Ed. by A. A. Shirov (Nauka, Moscow, 2020). https://doi.org/10.47711/sr1-2020

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. A. S. Osipova, V. I. Kabalina, and O. V. Mondrus, “Practices of attracting and selecting talented employees in the knowledge economy and traditional industries,” Org. Psikhol., No. 8 (4), 39–74 (2018).

  7. A. M. Salogub, “A systematic approach to managing creative personnel: An effective path to innovation,” Vlast’ Upr. Vost. Ross, No. 2 (95), 103–113 (2021).

  8. P. M. Brenner, “Motivating knowledge workers: The role of the workplace,” Quality Progress 32 (1), 33–37 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Rolf and K. Anders, “Sten Malmquist in memoriam,” J. Prod. Anal. 23, 141–142 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V.E. Gimpel’son and R. I. Kapelyushnikov, “The dynamics of the structure of jobs in Russia: polarization, improvement, stagnation?,” Preprint WP3/2022/05, NIU VShE (Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. S. Vikhanskii and A. G. Mirakyan, “New millennium: Managerial anomalies and modern concepts of leadership,” Ross. Zh. Menedzh. 16 (1), 105–126 (2018).

  12. S. A. Lipatov, “The problem of interaction between a person and an organization: Concepts and directions of research,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 14: Psikhol., No. 1, 85–96 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. A. Shtroo, “Man and organization in the conditions of modernization of economics,” in Modernization of the Economy and the State, Ed. by E. G. Yasin (Vysshaya Shkola Ekon., Moscow, 2007), Vol. 3, pp. 391–399 [in Russian].

  14. M. M. Abdullaeva and O. G. Korneva, “Creative activity of employees of the organization: A review of modern research,” Org. Psikhol., No. 3 (10), 100–123 (2020).

  15. G. V. Leonidova, K. A. Ustinova, and A. N. Gordievskaya, “Motives and conditions of creative labor activity of the population,” Vopr. Territ. Razvit., No. 3 (43), 1–18 (2018).

  16. O. A. Kholodov, “Motivation of labor in the system of intracompany economic relations,” Upr. Pers., No. 5, 52–56 (2009).

  17. Y. W. Ramirez and H. J. Steudel, “Measuring knowledge work: The knowledge work quantification framework,” J. Intellect. Cap. 9, 564–584 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. W. Ramirez and D. A. Nembhardt, “Measuring knowledge worker productivity,” J. Intellect. Cap. 5, 602–628 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. E. Andreeva, “Peculiarities of motivation of intellectual labor workers: Primary research results,” Ross. Zh. Menedzh. 8 (2), 47–68 (2010).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. A. Ustinova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ustinova, K.A., Terebova, S.V. Motives and Incentives for Creative Labor Activity of the Population. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 406–418 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723030152

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723030152

Keywords:

Navigation