Abstract—
The article proposes a conceptual approach to the formation of a scientific and methodological complex that ensures the implementation of state policy in the field of strategic planning. The place of the complex in the system of strategic planning and its structure are determined. The conditions and factors for increasing its effectiveness are investigated. An analysis of the provisions of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, On the Approval of the Fundamentals of State Policy in the Sphere of Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation, dated November 8, 2021, no. 633 is made. Its role in a new stage in the development of strategic planning in Russia as a targeted and long-term state policy necessary in the conditions of rapidly changing global economic and geopolitical trends is analyzed. Attention is focused on the necessity and importance of risk analysis in the system of strategic forecasting and planning. A model of knowledge mapping in the process of organizing work on the scientific and methodological support of strategic planning is given.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Fundamentals of State Policy in the Sphere of Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated November 8, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as Decree.) no. 633.Ch. I. P. 3. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/47244/page/1.
Decree, Ch. II. P. 9. Subitem a.
Decree, Section IV. P. 42. Subitem a.
Decree, Section IV. P. 42. Subitem з.
GOST R 56273.2-2016/CEN/TS 16555-2:2014: Innovation Management. Part 2. Strategic Intelligence Management, section 4, subsection 4.1.
GOST R 56273.1-2014/CEN/TS 16555-1:2013: Innovation Management. Part 1. Innovation Management System, section 6.
Decree. Section IV. P. 45.
GOST R 56273.2-2016/CEN/TS 16555-2:2014: Innovation Management. Part 2. Strategic Intelligence Management, section 5, subsection 5.7.
GOST R 56273.2-2016/CEN/TS 16555-2:2014: Innovation Management. Part 2. Strategic Intelligence Management, section 4, subsection 4.2, p. 4.4.2.
For example, they can be found on the website: https://www.satscan.org.
WEF Strategic Intelligence. https://intelligence.weforum.org/.
GOST R 56273.3-2016/CEN/TS 16555-3:2014: Innovation Management. Part 3. Innovative Thinking.
GOST R 56273.5-2016/CEN/TS 16555-5:2014: Innovation Management. Part 5. Collaboration Management.
GOST R 56273.6-2016/CEN/TS 16555-6:2014: Innovation Management. Part 6. Creativity Management.
GOST R 56273.7-2016/CEN/TS 16555-7:2015: Innovation Management. Part 7. Innovation Management Assessment.
How to Gameplan Your Office days: An Overachiever’s Guide to Hybrid Work. The Wall Street Journal, August 23, 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-to-gameplan-your-office-days-an-overachievers-guide-to-hybrid-work-11629711000.
The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes 2020. Gallup, October 2020. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321725/gallup-q12-meta-analysis-report.aspx.
11 companies with the best internal communication today. Blink. https://joinblink.com/intelligence/internal-communication-examples/.
SnapComms. case study. https://www.snapcomms.com/case-studies/internal-communication-case-studies#.
REFERENCES
E. R. Alexander, “The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation,” Plann. Theory 1 (3), 226–249 (2002).
H. I. Ansoff, “Changing shape of the strategic problem,” J. Gen. Manage. 4 (4), 42–58 (1977).
H. I. Ansoff, “Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals,” California Manage. Rev. 18 (2), 21–33 (1975).
V. Candy and J. Gordon, “The historical development of strategic planning theory,” Int. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 15 (2), 71–89 (2011).
H. W. Rittel and M. M. Webber, “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning,” Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973).
G. B. Kleiner, M. A. Rybachuk, and V. A. Karpinskaya, “Strategic planning and systemic optimization of the national economy,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 33, 243–248 (2022).
J. Sapir, “Is Economic Planning Our Future?,” Strategic planning and systemic optimization of the national economy,” Kleiner, M. A. Rybachuk, and V. A. Karpinskaya 33, 583–597 (2022).
A. Faludi, “From planning theory mark 1 to planning theory mark 3,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25 (7), 110–117 (1998).
A. Faludi, “The performance of spatial planning,” Plann. Pract. Res. 15 (4), 299–318 (2000).
N. Taylor, Urban Planning Theory since 1945 (SAGE, London, 1998).
A. Dynkin, “Forecasting is an extremely difficult scientific task,” Anal. Prognoz, No. 1, 12–17 (2019).
A. Ferreira, O. Sykes, and P. Batey, “Planning theory or planning theories? The hydra model and its implications for planning education,” J. Educ. Built Environ. 4 (2), 29–54 (2009).
A. Dynkin, “Response to grand challenges: The dimension of social sciences and the humanities,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 89, 120–124 (2019).
B. M. Hudson, T. D. Galloway, and J. L. Kaufman, “Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions,” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 45 (4), 387–398 (1979).
N. Ravindra, “Theory of planning: Comparison of four different urban development approaches,” Int. J. Res. Innovation Soc. Sci. 3, 580–583 (2019).
W. Woodall and D. C. Montgomery, “Research issue and ideas in statistical process control,” J. Qual. Technol. 31, 376–386 (1999).
W. Woodall and D. C. Montgomery, “Some current directions in the theory and application of statistical process monitoring,” J. Qual. Technol. 46, 78–94 (2014).
P. Qui and Z. Li, “On nonparametric statistical process control of univariate process,” Technometrics 53, 390–405 (2011).
J. Glaz and J. Naus, “Multiple coverage of the line,” Ann. Probab. 7, 900–906 (1979).
M. Kulldorff, “A spatial scan statistics,” Commun. Stat.: Theory Methods, 6, 1481–1496 (1997).
D. B. Neil, “Fast subset scan for spatial pattern detection,” J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 74, 337–360 (2012).
E. Telegina, “New reality of the international educational business environment and energy transition,” Energ. Politika 154 (12), 84–87 (2020).
H. I. Ansoff and R. G. Brandenburg, “The general manager of the future,” California Manage. Rev. 11 (3), 61–72 (1969).
V. Milovidov, “Mapping the knowledge: Servant leadership and proactive innovation management,” in Key Factors and Use Cases of Servant Leadership Driving Organizational Performance, Ed. by M. Pressentin (IGI Global, Hershey, 2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dynkin, A.A., Milovidov, V.D. The Science of Foresight: How to Succeed in Strategic Forecasting and Planning. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 285–296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723030048
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723030048